Analyzing the energy performance of manufacturing across levels using the end-use matrix

Abstract Within the context of the controversial use of the concept energy intensity to assess national energy performance, this paper proposes an innovative accounting framework: the energy end-use matrix. This tool integrates quantitative assessments of energy use of the various constituent compartments of socio-economic systems. More specifically it identifies, moving across levels of analysis, what compartments (or sub-compartments) are using what type of energy carriers for what type of end-use. This analysis is integrated with an assessment of labor requirements and the associated flows of value added. The end-use matrix thus integrates in a coherent way quantitative assessments across different dimensions and hierarchical scales and facilitates the development of integrated sets of indicators. In this way it contributes to a multi-criteria characterization of national or sectoral energy performance. The tool is illustrated with an analysis of three EU countries: Bulgaria, Finland and Spain. Challenges to improving the usefulness of biophysical analysis of the efficiency of the industrial sector are identified and discussed. Increasing the discriminatory power of quantitative analysis through better data standardization by statistical offices is the major challenge.

[1]  Wilfred Beckerman,et al.  Energy and Economic Myths , 2008 .

[2]  Loren Lutzenhiser,et al.  Through the energy efficiency looking glass , 2014 .

[3]  Kozo Mayumi,et al.  The Origins of Ecological Economics: The Bioeconomics of Georgescu-Roegen , 2001 .

[4]  Richard Schlegel,et al.  The Entropy Law and the Economic Process , 1973 .

[5]  M. Patterson What is energy efficiency?: Concepts, indicators and methodological issues , 1996 .

[6]  W. Ziegler Atlantic Crossings Social Politics In A Progressive Age , 2016 .

[7]  J. Leggett,et al.  President Obama’s Climate Action Plan , 2013 .

[8]  Sadi Carnot,et al.  Reflections on the Motive Power of Heat: And on Machines Fitted to Develop That Power , 2017 .

[9]  Zhe Tian,et al.  Energy efficiency evaluation of key energy consumption sectors in China based on a macro-evaluating system , 2018, Energy.

[10]  I. S. Jawahir,et al.  Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels , 2010 .

[11]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Resource accounting for sustainability assessment : the nexus between energy, food, water and land use , 2014 .

[12]  Robert Russell,et al.  A Beginner's Guide , 2016 .

[13]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  International comparisons of energy efficiency-Methodologies for the manufacturing industry , 1997 .

[14]  R. K. Cattell,et al.  Structural change and energy efficiency in industry , 1983 .

[15]  Joseph E. Stiglitz Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz , 1997 .

[16]  Krushna Mahapatra,et al.  A behavioral change-based approach to energy efficiency in a manufacturing plant , 2018 .

[17]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  The Metabolic Pattern of Societies: Where Economists Fall Short , 2011 .

[18]  Paolo Bertoldi,et al.  Beyond energy efficiency and individual behaviours: policy insights from social practice theories , 2018 .

[19]  Wei Cai,et al.  A tool for assessing the energy demand and efficiency of machining systems: Energy benchmarking , 2017 .

[20]  Gerald Leach,et al.  Net energy analysis — is it any use? , 1975 .

[21]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Are energy statistics useful for making energy scenarios , 2012 .

[22]  Jonathan R. Woetzel,et al.  Debt and (not much) deleveraging , 2015 .

[23]  Edward F. Renshaw,et al.  Energy efficiency and the slump in labour productivity in the USA , 1981 .

[24]  Peter F. Chapman,et al.  1. Energy costs: a review of methods , 1974 .

[25]  P. Glansdorff,et al.  Thermodynamic theory of structure, stability and fluctuations , 1971 .

[26]  Pierre Van Rysselberghe,et al.  Introduction to Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. , 1956 .

[27]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Societal Metabolism and Multiple-Scale Integrated Assessment: Empirical Validation and Examples of Application , 2000 .

[28]  G. Fiorito Can we use the energy intensity indicator to study decoupling in modern economies , 2013 .

[29]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Decomposition of useful work intensity: The EU (European Union)-15 countries from 1960 to 2009 , 2014 .

[30]  Bridging the gap between energy-to-GDP ratio and composite energy intensity index , 2018, Energy Policy.

[31]  Peter Maurer,et al.  The Entropy Law And The Economic Process , 2016 .

[32]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Smart manufacturing and energy systems , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[33]  Vincent Moreau,et al.  Decoupling energy use and economic growth: Counter evidence from structural effects and embodied energy in trade , 2018 .

[34]  T. Domingos,et al.  The multi-factor energy input–output model , 2017 .

[35]  H. Odum,et al.  TIME'S SPEED REGULATOR: THE OPTIMUM EFFICIENCY FOR MAXIMUM POWER OUTPUT IN PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2011 .

[36]  Jennifer Karns Alexander,et al.  The Mantra of Efficiency: From Waterwheel to Social Control , 2008 .

[37]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multiple-Scale Integrated Assessments of Societal Metabolism: Integrating Biophysical and Economic Representations Across Scales , 2000 .

[38]  Xin Yao,et al.  Multi-scale statistical process monitoring in machining , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[39]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Energy Analysis for a Sustainable Future: Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal and Ecosystem Metabolism , 2012 .

[40]  A. J. Lotka Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution. , 1922, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  M. Giampietro,et al.  The energy metabolism of China and India between 1971 and 2010: Studying the bifurcation , 2015 .

[42]  Sustainable Performance of Taiwanese Manufacturing Industries Over the Past Decade (2006-2015) , 2017 .

[43]  Katharine N. Farrell,et al.  The flow/fund model of Conga: exploring the anatomy of environmental conflicts at the Andes–Amazon commodity frontier , 2013, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[44]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Interfuel substitution and decomposition of changes in industrial energy consumption , 1992 .

[45]  H. White A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy , 2014 .

[46]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  What is wrong with energy efficiency? , 2018 .

[47]  F. Schneider,et al.  The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements , 2010 .

[48]  Fei Liu,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of machining parameters considering energy consumption , 2013, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[49]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multiple-Scale Integrated Assessment of Societal Metabolism: Introducing the Approach , 2000 .