Contested artifact: technology sensemaking, actor networks, and the shaping of the Web browser

Much of IT research focuses on issues of adoption and adaptation of established technology artifacts by users and organizations and has neglected issues of how new technologies come into existence and evolve. To fill this gap, this paper depicts a complex picture of technology evolution to illustrate the development of Web browser technology. Building on actor‐network theory as a basis for studying complex technology evolution processes, it explores the emergence of the browser using content analysis techniques on archival data from 1993‐1998. Identifies three processes of inscribing, translating, and framing that clarify how actors acted and reacted to each other and to the emergent technological definition of the browser. This spiral development pattern incorporates complex interplay between base beliefs about what a browser is, artifacts that are the instantiation of those beliefs, evaluation routines that compare the evolving artifact to collective expectations, and strategic moves that attempt to skew the development process to someone's advantage. This approach clarifies the complex interdependence of disparate elements that over time produced the Web browser as it is known today.

[1]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The role of standards in innovation and diffusion of broadband mobile services: The case of South Korea , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[2]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[3]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[4]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2000 .

[5]  Petter Nielsen,et al.  Control Devolution as Information Infrastructure Design Strategy: A case study of a content service platform for mobile phones in Norway , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[7]  Heejin Lee,et al.  A standards war waged by a developing country: Understanding international standard setting from the actor-network perspective , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[9]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[10]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[11]  Marc Berg,et al.  Accumulating and Coordinating: Occasions for Information Technologies in Medical Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[12]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[13]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[14]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[15]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[16]  S. Shapin.  Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[17]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Competing On Internet Time: Lessons From Netscape And Its Battle With Microsoft , 1998 .

[18]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[19]  K. Weick.  Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[20]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Learning the Innovation Journey: Order out of Chaos? , 1996 .

[21]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[22]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[23]  H. Bussell.  Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide , 2000 .

[24]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[25]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Improving Software Productivity , 1987, Computer.

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[27]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[28]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[29]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[31]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[32]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change , 1990 .

[33]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[34]  Robert B. Grady,et al.  Successful Software Process Improvement , 1997 .

[35]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[36]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  On extending social informatics from a rich legacy of networks and conceptual resources , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[37]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[38]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  4 Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry☆ , 1994 .

[39]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[40]  Terri L. Griffith.  Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[41]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[42]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[43]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[44]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Weaving The Web: The Original Design And Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web , 1999 .

[45]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[46]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[47]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[48]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .