Teaching Replays, Teaching Rehearsals, and Re-Visions of Practice: Learning from Colleagues in a Mathematics Teacher Community

Background/Context Research shows that teachers’ understandings of students, subject, and teaching influence their classroom practice. Additionally, teachers’ colleagues have a role in shaping individuals’ approaches to teaching and their responses to reform. Focus of Study To understand how interactions with colleagues support teachers’ informal learning, I examined teachers’ collegial conversations in a highly collaborative teacher community. Setting This research took place within a collaborative, improvement-oriented urban high school mathematics department that showed evidence of increasing access to and rigor in its curriculum. Participants Six high school mathematics teachers and the researcher as a participant observer worked together in a group focusing on detracking ninth-grade algebra classes. Research Design This 2-year ethnographic study went inside the teacher community, with the researcher teaching alongside the teachers to gain access to their interactions and workings. Data Collection and Analysis Approximately 100 hours of teachers’ collaborative conversations were observed and recorded through audio- and videotape and field notes. Using a situated learning framework and sociolinguistic analyses, I examined teacher-to-teacher talk that constituted episodes of pedagogical reasoning (EPRs) to understand how collegial conversations provide resources for teacher learning. Findings Across EPRs, two forms of discourse were important sites for representing, and sometimes learning about, teaching practice, which I call teaching replays and teaching rehearsals. Extended replays or rehearsals supported a re-visioning routine, interactions in which teachers elaborated, reconsidered, or revised their understanding of complex teaching situations while providing particular, emotionally involving accounts of the classroom. The examination of these interactions further specifies conditions that support teachers’ collegial learning. Conclusions Theoretically, this article illustrates a process of learning as recontextualiza-tion, as the teachers work between general teaching principles and specific occurrences in their classrooms. Practically, by highlighting the work that teachers do to make sense of innovative practices, this analysis provides a description of how collegial conversations can support teachers’ informal learning, supporting the development of professional communities.

[1]  James P. Spillane External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment , 1999 .

[2]  Leslie Santee Siskin,et al.  The Subjects in Question: Departmental Organization and the High School. The Series on School Reform. , 1995 .

[3]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[4]  Ilana Seidel Horn,et al.  Learning on the Job: A Situated Account of Teacher Learning in High School Mathematics Departments , 2005 .

[5]  Rochelle Gutiérrez Advancing Urban Latina/o Youth in Mathematics: Lessons from an Effective High School Mathematics Department , 1999 .

[6]  Randall J. Souviney Learning to Teach Mathematics , 1989 .

[7]  B. Achinstein Community, Diversity, and Conflict Among Schoolteachers: the Ties that Blind (Advances in Contemporary Educational Thought Series) , 2002 .

[8]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Transitions into Teaching: Learning to Teach Writing in Teacher Education and Beyond , 2000 .

[9]  Eric M. Camburn,et al.  Professional Community in Chicago Elementary Schools: Facilitating Factors and Organizational Consequences , 1997 .

[10]  I. Horn Turnaround Students in High School Mathematics: Constructing Identities of Competence Through Mathematical Worlds , 2008 .

[11]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  An Emerging Framework for Analyzing School-Based Professional Community. , 1993 .

[12]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview , 1987 .

[13]  J. Little,et al.  Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom Practice. , 2003 .

[14]  Megan L. Franke,et al.  Learning to Teach Mathematics: Focus on Student Thinking , 2001 .

[15]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[16]  Ilana Seidel Horn,et al.  Attending to Problems of Practice: Routines and Resources for Professional Learning in Teachers’ Workplace Interactions , 2010 .

[17]  D. Lortie Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study , 1976 .

[18]  Rochelle Gutiérrez,et al.  Practices, beliefs and cultures of high school mathematics departments: understanding their influence on student advancement , 1996 .

[19]  J. Talbert,et al.  Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching , 2001 .

[20]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[21]  Phil Vahey,et al.  Characterizing Adaptive Expertise in Science Teaching , 2005 .

[22]  J. Little Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work , 2002 .

[23]  Leslie Santee Siskin Realms Of Knowledge: Academic Departments In Secondary Schools , 1994 .

[24]  Stephen J. Mezias,et al.  Toto, I don't Think we're in Kansas Anymore , 1999 .

[25]  Marilyn Cochran-Smith,et al.  Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities , 1999 .

[26]  I. Horn Fast Kids, Slow Kids, Lazy Kids: Framing the Mismatch Problem in Mathematics Teachers' Conversations , 2007 .

[27]  Susan Johnson Teachers at Work: Achieving Success in Our Schools , 1990 .

[28]  S. Loucks-Horsley Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[29]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[30]  Magdalene Lampert,et al.  Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching , 2001 .

[31]  C. Coburn,et al.  Collective Sensemaking about Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities , 2001 .

[32]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Toward a Theory of Teacher Community. , 2001 .

[33]  S. Ball,et al.  Subject departments and the ‘implementation’ of National Curriculum policy: an overview of the issues , 1992 .

[34]  Sharon Hamilton-Wieler The Fallacy of Decontextualization. , 1988 .

[35]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[36]  C. Coburn,et al.  Framing the Problem of Reading Instruction: Using Frame Analysis to Uncover the Microprocesses of Policy Implementation , 2006 .

[37]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Teacher Learning in the Context of a Video Club. , 2004 .

[38]  Bert van Oers The fallacy of decontextualization , 1998 .

[39]  D. Tannen Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse , 1989 .

[40]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Teachers’ Professional Community in Restructuring Schools , 1996 .

[41]  S. J. Ball,et al.  Subject Disciplines as the Opportunity for Group Action: A Measured Critique of Subject Sub-cultures , 2019 .