How Agents' Turn-Taking Strategies Influence Impressions and Response Behaviors

Different turn-taking strategies of an agent influence the impression that people have of it and the behaviors that they display in response. To study these influences, we carried out several studies. In the first study, subjects listened as bystanders to computer-generated, unintelligible conversations between two speakers. In the second study, subjects talked to an artificial interviewer which was controlled by a human in a Wizard of Oz setting. Questionnaires with semantic differential scales concerning personality, emotion, social skill, and interviewing skills were used in both studies to assess the impressions that the subjects have of the agents that carried out different turn-taking strategies. In addition, in order to assess the effects of these strategies on the subjects' behavior, we measured several aspects in the subjects' speech, such as speaking rate and turn length. We found that different turn-taking strategies indeed influence the user's perception. Starting too early (interrupting the user) is mostly associated with negative and strong personality attributes and is perceived as less agreeable and more assertive. Leaving pauses between turns is perceived as more agreeable, less assertive, and creates the feeling of having more rapport. Finally, we found that turn-taking strategies also influence the subjects' speaking behavior.

[1]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  The effects of interruption, gender, and status on interpersonal perceptions , 1989 .

[2]  David Schlangen,et al.  From reaction to prediction: experiments with computational models of turn-taking , 2006, INTERSPEECH.

[3]  G. Beattie.  Interruption in conversational interaction, and its relation to the sex and status of the interactants* , 1981 .

[4]  E. Schegloff.  Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 2000, Language in Society.

[5]  Maxine Eskénazi,et al.  Optimizing Endpointing Thresholds using Dialogue Features in a Spoken Dialogue System , 2008, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[6]  J. Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational agents , 2000 .

[7]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Teaching Computers to Conduct Spoken Interviews: Breaking the Realtime Barrier with Learning , 2009, IVA.

[8]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: some Canadian data , 1973, Language in Society.

[9]  Nivja H. Jong,et al.  Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[10]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Generating Simple Conversations , 2009, COST 2102 Training School.

[11]  David Schlangen,et al.  Towards Incremental End-of-Utterance Detection in Dialogue Systems , 2008, COLING.

[12]  Bengt Oreström.  Turn-taking in English conversation , 1983 .

[13]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational interface agents , 2000, CACM.

[14]  Laura Staum Casasanto,et al.  Virtually accommodating: Speech rate accommodation to a virtual interlocutor , 2010 .

[15]  L. R. Goldberg.  The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[16]  Catherine Pelachaud,et al.  An empathic virtual dialog agent to improve human-machine interaction , 2008, AAMAS.

[17]  J. Dawes.  Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales , 2008 .

[18]  M. Walker,et al.  Switching pauses in cooperative and competitive conversations , 1984 .

[19]  J. Goldberg.  Interrupting the discourse on interruptions , 1990 .

[20]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  Messages embedded in gaze of interface agents --- impression management with agent's gaze , 2002, CHI.

[21]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Turn Management or Impression Management? , 2009, IVA.

[22]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[23]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  How Turn-Taking Strategies Influence Users' Impressions of an Agent , 2010, IVA.

[24]  Timo Baumann.  Simulating Spoken Dialogue With a Focus on Realistic Turn-Taking , 2008 .

[25]  Brigitte Krenn,et al.  Fully generated scripted dialogue for embodied agents , 2008, Artif. Intell..

[26]  Mikio Nakano,et al.  Effects of system barge-in responses on user impressions , 1999, EUROSPEECH.

[27]  Etienne de Sevin,et al.  A Model of Personality and Emotional Traits , 2009, IVA.

[28]  A. Colman,et al.  Comparing Rating Scales of Different Lengths: Equivalence of Scores from 5-Point and 7-Point Scales , 1997 .

[29]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  A Conversational Agent as Museum Guide - Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Application , 2005, IVA.

[30]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Learning Smooth, Human-Like Turntaking in Realtime Dialogue , 2008, IVA.