The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography.

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to evaluate whether the absence of coronary calcium could rule out >or=50% coronary stenosis or the need for revascularization. BACKGROUND The latest American Heart Association guidelines suggest that a calcium score (CS) of zero might exclude the need for coronary angiography among symptomatic patients. METHODS A substudy was made of the CORE64 (Coronary Evaluation Using Multi-Detector Spiral Computed Tomography Angiography Using 64 Detectors) multicenter trial comparing the diagnostic performance of 64-detector computed tomography to conventional angiography. Patients clinically referred for conventional angiography were asked to undergo a CS scan up to 30 days before. RESULTS In all, 291 patients were included, of whom 214 (73%) were male, and the mean age was 59.3 +/- 10.0 years. A total of 14 (5%) patients had low, 218 (75%) had intermediate, and 59 (20%) had high pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease. The overall prevalence of >or=50% stenosis was 56%. A total of 72 patients had CS = 0, among whom 14 (19%) had at least 1 >or=50% stenosis. The overall sensitivity for CS = 0 to predict the absence of >or=50% stenosis was 45%, specificity was 91%, negative predictive value was 68%, and positive predictive value was 81%. Additionally, revascularization was performed in 9 (12.5%) CS = 0 patients within 30 days of the CS. From a total of 383 vessels without any coronary calcification, 47 (12%) presented with >or=50% stenosis; and from a total of 64 totally occluded vessels, 13 (20%) had no calcium. CONCLUSIONS The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive stenosis or the need for revascularization among patients with high enough suspicion of coronary artery disease to be referred for coronary angiography, in contrast with the published recommendations. Total coronary occlusion frequently occurs in the absence of any detectable calcification. (Coronary Evaluation Using Multi-Detector Spiral Computed Tomography Angiography Using 64 Detectors [CORE-64]; NCT00738218).

[1]  B. Lewis,et al.  Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64-slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of a chest pain syndrome. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiolog , 2006, Circulation.

[3]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[4]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Prevalence of noncalcified coronary plaques by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for significant coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Ralph Haberl,et al.  Multislice Spiral Computed Tomographic Angiography of Coronary Arteries in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: An Effective Filter Before Catheter Angiography? , 2005 .

[6]  A. Hirayama,et al.  Prognostic value of non-obstructive CT low-dense coronary artery plaques detected by multislice computed tomography. , 2007, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[7]  C. White,et al.  Relation of coronary calcium scores by electron beam tomography to obstructive disease in 2,115 symptomatic patients. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  W. Desmet,et al.  Discrepancy between visual estimation and computer-assisted measurement of lesion severity before and after coronary angioplasty. , 1994, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[9]  Mark A. Hlatky,et al.  ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring By Computed Tomography in Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and in Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain , 2007 .

[10]  G. Condorelli,et al.  Nephrotoxicity of low-osmolality versus iso-osmolality contrast agents: impact of N-acetylcysteine. , 2005, Kidney international.

[11]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  D. Berman,et al.  Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  T. Chalmers,et al.  Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration , 1994, The Lancet.

[14]  B Meier,et al.  Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Ioannis Kakadiaris,et al.  Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  J. Rumberger,et al.  Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. , 1995, Circulation.

[17]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pathology of the Vulnerable Plaque , 2006 .

[19]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  K. Gould,et al.  Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary plaque disruption. , 1995, Circulation.

[22]  W D Wagner,et al.  A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. , 1995, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[23]  Moyses Szklo,et al.  Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome: plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Zahi A Fayad,et al.  Atherothrombosis and high-risk plaque: part I: evolving concepts. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  A. Morise,et al.  Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[27]  N. Paul,et al.  Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64 , 2008, European Radiology.

[28]  D. Faxon,et al.  Five-year angiographic follow-up of factors associated with progression of coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). CASS Participating Investigators and Staff. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.