A Simulation Study on the Efficacy of Advanced Belt Restraints to Mitigate the Effects of Obesity for Rear-Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes

Objective: Recent field data analyses have shown that the safety advantages of rear seats relative to the front seats have decreased in newer vehicles. Separately, the risks of certain injuries have been found to be higher for obese occupants. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of advanced belt features on the protection of rear-seat occupants with a range of body mass index (BMI) in frontal crashes. Methods: Whole-body finite element human models with 4 BMI levels (25, 30, 35, and 40 kg/m2) developed previously were used in this study. A total of 52 frontal crash simulations were conducted, including 4 simulations with a standard rear-seat, 3-point belt and 48 simulations with advanced belt features. The parameters varied in the simulations included BMI, load limit, anchor pretensioner, and lap belt routing relative to the pelvis. The injury measurements analyzed in this study included head and hip excursions, normalized chest deflection, and torso angle (defined as the angle between the hip–shoulder line and the vertical direction). Analyses of covariance were used to test the significance (P <.05) of the results. Results: Higher BMI was associated with greater head and hip excursions and larger normalized chest deflection. Higher belt routing increased the hip excursion and torso angle, which indicates a higher submarining risk, whereas the anchor pretensioner reduced hip excursion and torso angle. Lower load limits decreased the normalized chest deflection but increased the head excursion. Normalized chest deflection had a positive correlation with maximum torso angle. Occupants with higher BMI have to use higher load limits to reach head excursions similar to those in lower BMI occupants. Discussion and Conclusion: The simulation results suggest that optimizing load limiter and adding pretensioner(s) can reduce injury risks associated with obesity, but conflicting effects on head and chest injuries were observed. This study demonstrated the feasibility and importance of using human models to investigate protection for occupants with various BMI levels. A seat belt system capable of adapting to occupant size and body shape will improve protection for obese occupants in rear seats.

[1]  K. Flegal,et al.  Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. , 2010, JAMA.

[2]  Peter Cummings,et al.  Passenger seating position and the risk of passenger death or injury in traffic crashes. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Matthew P Reed,et al.  Effects of Obesity on Seat Belt Fit , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[4]  Jason Forman,et al.  Rear seat occupant safety: kinematics and injury of PMHS restrained by a standard 3-point belt in frontal crashes. , 2008, Stapp car crash journal.

[5]  Joseph M Cormier,et al.  The influence of body mass index on thoracic injuries in frontal impacts. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Kennerly Digges,et al.  Trend of Rear Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes over Model Years of Vehicles , 2009 .

[7]  Jason Forman,et al.  Rear seat occupant safety: an investigation of a progressive force-limiting, pretensioning 3-point belt system using adult PMHS in frontal sled tests. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[8]  Lynne E Bilston,et al.  The Scope and Nature of Injuries to Rear Seat Passengers in NSW Using Linked Hospital Admission and Police Data , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  David C. Viano,et al.  Field Data Analysis of Rear Occupant Injuries Part I: Adults and Teenagers , 2003 .

[10]  Jingwen Hu,et al.  Computer simulations of obesity effects on occupant injury in frontal impacts , 2013 .

[11]  Michael James Turkovich,et al.  The effects of obesity on occupant injury risk in frontal impact: a computer modeling approach , 2011 .

[12]  Jason Forman,et al.  The effect of obesity on the restraint of automobile occupants. , 2009, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[13]  J. Forman,et al.  Is There Really a “Cushion Effect”?: A Biomechanical Investigation of Crash Injury Mechanisms in the Obese , 2010, Obesity.

[14]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Effects of obesity on occupant responses in frontal crashes: a simulation analysis using human body models , 2015, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[15]  Jason Forman,et al.  Occupant restraint in the rear seat: ATD responses to standard and pre-tensioning, force-limiting belt restraints. , 2008, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[16]  Julie Brown,et al.  A matched-cohort analysis of belted front and rear seat occupants in newer and older model vehicles shows that gains in front occupant safety have outpaced gains for rear seat occupants. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Jason Forman,et al.  Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes and Its Feasibility , 2007 .

[18]  F Bendjellal,et al.  Comparison of Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes for Occupant Restrained without Belt Load Limiters and Those Restrained with 6 kN and 4 kN Belt Load Limiters. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[19]  Katherine M Flegal,et al.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. , 2012, JAMA.

[20]  Shashi Kuppa,et al.  Rear seat occupant protection in frontal crashes , 2005 .

[21]  King H. Yang,et al.  High-speed seatbelt pretensioner loading of the abdomen. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[22]  Dhafer Marzougui,et al.  Reduced protection for belted occupants in rear seats relative to front seats of new model year vehicles. , 2010, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.