Phase Transitions in a Gene Network Model of Morphogenesis

A model of biological morphogenesis is presented. The model is based in a gene-network cell description plus the interaction among cells. Here interactions between nearest cells are due to diffusion-like mechanisms and also to inductive, cell-to-cell interactions. The gene network properties are studied and their relationship with previous abstract graph-based analogies are explored, showing they are robust. An extensive analysis of random gene networks shows that spatial patterns are common in both types of interaction but are much more common in the inductive case. These results support the idea that evolution does not need to fine tune through a high-dimensional parameter space, since spatial patterning is already a robust property of spatially extended gene networks.

[1]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[2]  James W. Valentine,et al.  WHY NO NEW PHYLA AFTER THE CAMBRIAN? GENOME AND ECOSPACE HYPOTHESES REVISITED , 1995 .

[3]  R V Solé,et al.  Phenotypic and dynamical transitions in model genetic networks II. Application to the evolution of segmentation mechanisms , 2001, Evolution & development.

[4]  David H. Sharp,et al.  Model for cooperative control of positional information in Drosophila by bicoid and maternal hunchback. , 1995, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[5]  H. Meinhardt,et al.  Biological pattern formation: fmm basic mechanisms ta complex structures , 1994 .

[6]  S. Newman,et al.  Generic physical mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis: A common basis for development and evolution , 1994 .

[7]  H. Meinhardt,et al.  A model for pattern formation on the shells of molluscs , 1987 .

[8]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[9]  Lewis Wolpert,et al.  Principles of Development , 1997 .

[10]  M. Pascual.  Understanding nonlinear dynamics , 1996 .

[11]  G. von Dassow,et al.  Modularity in animal development and evolution: elements of a conceptual framework for EvoDevo. , 1999, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[12]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs , 1985 .

[13]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Cells, Embryos and Evolution , 1997 .

[14]  S. Kauffman.  The large scale structure and dynamics of gene control circuits: an ensemble approach. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  J. W. Valentine,et al.  Fossils, molecules and embryos: new perspectives on the Cambrian explosion. , 1999, Development.

[16]  S. Morris.  Crucible Of Creation , 1998 .

[17]  J. Slack.  From Egg to Embryo , 1983 .

[18]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[19]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Cell division, differentiation and dynamic clustering , 1993, adap-org/9311001.

[20]  R. Solé,et al.  Phenotypic and dynamical transitions in model genetic networks I. Emergence of patterns and genotype‐phenotype relationships , 2001, Evolution & development.

[21]  L. Glass,et al.  The logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  H. Meinhardt.  Models of biological pattern formation , 1982 .

[23]  R. Engelhardt,et al.  EARLY BIOLOGICAL MORPHOGENESIS AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS , 1995 .

[24]  P. Maini,et al.  Pattern formation by lateral inhibition with feedback: a mathematical model of delta-notch intercellular signalling. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  S. Kauffman.  Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  N. M. Brooke,et al.  The ParaHox gene cluster is an evolutionary sister of the Hox gene cluster , 1998, Nature.

[27]  David H. Sharp,et al.  A connectionist model of development. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  John Cohen,et al.  EMBRYOS AND EVOLUTION , 1982 .

[29]  Johnson.  Speciation: Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities, dominance and gene interactions. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  M. Cross,et al.  Pattern formation outside of equilibrium , 1993 .