Reduced connectivity between the left fusiform body area and the extrastriate body area in anorexia nervosa is associated with body image distortion

The aim of the present study was to investigate the network and its effective connectivity subserving body processing in women suffering from anorexia nervosa (AN) and also in healthy controls. Ten women diagnosed with AN and 15 healthy, age matched controls were investigated using fMRI during viewing images of bodies and chairs. Effective connectivity between cortical areas which are involved in human visual body processing was accessed. Effective connectivity analysis yielded evidence for a different network in AN and healthy controls during visual processing of human bodies. Left sided effective connectivity in the occipital cortex of women with AN showed a highly negative correlation with body size misjudgment. Present results yield evidence for altered networks for body processing in women with AN. Results explain body size misjudgment, a key feature in AN, which seems to be based on reduced effective connectivity in the body processing network.

[1]  Amanda L. Kaas,et al.  Distinct cortical networks for the detection and identification of human body , 2009, NeuroImage.

[2]  Rebecca F. Schwarzlose,et al.  Separate Face and Body Selectivity on the Fusiform Gyrus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Dietrich Grönemeyer,et al.  Differential neuronal responses to the self and others in the extrastriate body area and the fusiform body area , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  P. Downing,et al.  The neural basis of visual body perception , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  T. F. Cash,et al.  The nature and extent of body-image disturbances in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: a meta-analysis. , 1997, The International journal of eating disorders.

[6]  Boris Suchan,et al.  Reduction of gray matter density in the extrastriate body area in women with anorexia nervosa , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Using multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data to interpret overlapping functional activations , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  M. A. Thompson,et al.  Development and validation of a new body-image assessment scale. , 1995, Journal of personality assessment.

[10]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Visual body perception in anorexia nervosa. , 2012, The International journal of eating disorders.

[11]  D Grönemeyer,et al.  Changes in neuronal correlates of body image processing by means of cognitive-behavioural body image therapy for eating disorders: a randomized controlled fMRI study , 2010, Psychological Medicine.

[12]  Denise A. Minnebusch,et al.  A bilateral occipitotemporal network mediates face perception , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Constraining the cortical face network by neuroimaging studies of acquired prosopagnosia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[15]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Magnetic Stimulation of Extrastriate Body Area Impairs Visual Processing of Nonfacial Body Parts , 2004, Current Biology.

[16]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Division of Labor between Lateral and Ventral Extrastriate Representations of Faces, Bodies, and Objects , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Denise A. Minnebusch,et al.  Event‐related potentials reflect heterogeneity of developmental prosopagnosia , 2007, European Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Denise A. Minnebusch,et al.  Neuropsychological mechanisms of visual face and body perception , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[19]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  The role of the extrastriate body area in action perception , 2006, Social neuroscience.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  V Bruce,et al.  Configural Features in the Context of Upright and Inverted Faces , 2001, Perception.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[24]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  M. Candidi,et al.  Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  A. Ishai,et al.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Luca Passamonti,et al.  Changes in “Top-Down” Connectivity Underlie Repetition Suppression in the Ventral Visual Pathway , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Patterns of fMRI Activity Dissociate Overlapping Functional Brain Areas that Respond to Biological Motion , 2006, Neuron.

[31]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Overlapping Lateral Occipitotemporal Activations Using Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis , 2006 .