Building Complex Seismic Velocity Models for Deep Learning Inversion

Training a deep learning inversion network usually requires hundreds of thousands of complex velocity models, which is labor-intensive and expensive to acquire. In this work, we develop a new framework to automatically generate various velocity models with common geological structures, such as folding layers, faults and salt bodies. There are three main modules in the proposed framework. The first module generates a folded model with a given number of layers; the other two modules can add faults and salt bodies onto the folded model to form a fault or salt model, respectively. To best simulate the shape of subsurface geological structures while ensuring a good application effect in deep learning inversion, we generate the structural model based on composition of several basic functions with recommended parameter ranges. Then the generated structural model will be assigned with velocity values based on assumptions of underground seismic velocity distribution. To investigate the application effect of the generated 3D models, we conduct a deep learning inversion test. Since currently there is no 3D deep learning inversion algorithms available, the latest 2D inversion network called SeisInvNet is used to test the feasibility of the randomly generated velocity models. Through the experiments, we can see that the 2D inversion results are consistent with the true models from the aspects of velocity values and geological structure shapes, which demonstrates the rationality of the designed 3D models. In the end, we further discuss the feasibility of applying the proposed 3D model dataset to train a 3D inversion network. This work paves the way for the development of 3D deep learning inversion methods.

[1]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[2]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Deep-learning seismic full-waveform inversion for realistic structural models , 2020 .

[3]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  Multitask learning for local seismic image processing: fault detection, structure-oriented smoothing with edge-preserving, and seismic normal estimation by using a single convolutional neural network , 2019 .

[4]  Sebastiano Foti,et al.  Surface-wave analysis for building near-surface velocity models — Established approaches and new perspectives , 2010 .

[5]  G. Caumon,et al.  Surface-Based 3D Modeling of Geological Structures , 2009 .

[6]  R. Gawthorpe,et al.  Salt-influenced normal fault growth and forced folding: The Stavanger Fault System, North Sea , 2013 .

[7]  K. Holliger Upper-crustal seismic velocity heterogeneity as derived from a variety of P-wave sonic logs , 1996 .

[8]  Haibin Di,et al.  Developing a seismic texture analysis neural network for machine-aided seismic pattern recognition and classification , 2019, Geophysical Journal International.

[9]  Yile Ao,et al.  Seismic Structural Curvature Volume Extraction With Convolutional Neural Networks , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Zhongping Zhang,et al.  Data-Driven Seismic Waveform Inversion: A Study on the Robustness and Generalization , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  FaultSeg3D: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[12]  Yunzhi Shi,et al.  Applications of supervised deep learning for seismic interpretation and inversion , 2019, The Leading Edge.

[13]  Bruno C. Vendeville,et al.  Mechanics of active salt diapirism , 1993 .

[14]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Automatic microseismic event picking via unsupervised machine learning , 2020, Geophysical Journal International.

[15]  R. Pratt Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain; Part 1, Theory and verification in a physical scale model , 1999 .

[16]  Nikolaos Doulamis,et al.  Deep Learning for Computer Vision: A Brief Review , 2018, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[17]  Gary Martin,et al.  Marmousi2 An elastic upgrade for Marmousi , 2006 .

[18]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Deep denoising autoencoder for seismic random noise attenuation , 2020 .

[19]  P. Lailly,et al.  Marmousi, model and data , 1990 .

[20]  Jianwei Ma,et al.  Deep learning for denoising , 2018, GEOPHYSICS.

[21]  Song Jie,et al.  An overview of ahead geological prospecting in tunneling , 2017 .

[22]  Martin J. Blunt,et al.  Stochastic Seismic Waveform Inversion Using Generative Adversarial Networks as a Geological Prior , 2018, Mathematical Geosciences.

[23]  Weiqiang Zhu,et al.  PhaseNet: A Deep-Neural-Network-Based Seismic Arrival Time Picking Method , 2018, Geophysical Journal International.

[24]  Mohammed Bennamoun,et al.  Image-Based 3D Object Reconstruction: State-of-the-Art and Trends in the Deep Learning Era , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[25]  S. Brandsberg-Dahl,et al.  The 2004 BP Velocity Benchmark , 2005 .

[26]  B. Alaei Seismic Modeling of Complex Geological Structures , 2012 .

[27]  S. Fomel,et al.  Building realistic structure models to train convolutional neural networks for seismic structural interpretation , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[28]  Robert J. Knipe,et al.  Faulting, fault sealing and fluid flow in hydrocarbon reservoirs: an introduction , 1998, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[29]  Junjie Wu,et al.  Adaptive Differential Evolution by Adjusting Subcomponent Crossover Rate for High-Dimensional Waveform Inversion , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[30]  Vladimir Puzyrev,et al.  Deep learning electromagnetic inversion with convolutional neural networks , 2018, Geophysical Journal International.

[31]  Anne H. Schistad Solberg,et al.  Convolutional neural networks for automated seismic interpretation , 2018, The Leading Edge.

[32]  Youzuo Lin,et al.  Inversionet: Accurate and efficient seismic-waveform inversion with convolutional neural networks , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[33]  Hao Wu,et al.  Semiautomatic first-arrival picking of microseismic events by using the pixel-wise convolutional image segmentation method , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[34]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[35]  Wuyang Yang,et al.  Deep learning for ground-roll noise attenuation , 2018 .

[36]  J. Paffenholz,et al.  SIGSBEE_2A Synthetic Subsalt Dataset - Image Quality as Function of Migration Algorithm and Velocity Model Error , 2002 .

[37]  Sergey Fomel,et al.  Building realistic structure models to train convolutional neural networks for seismic structural interpretation , 2020 .

[38]  Peng Jiang,et al.  Deep Learning Inversion of Electrical Resistivity Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[39]  A. R. Syversveen,et al.  Fault displacement modelling using 3D vector fields , 2010, Computational Geosciences.

[40]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[41]  Jean Virieux,et al.  An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics , 2009 .

[42]  Amir Adler,et al.  Deep-learning tomography , 2018 .

[43]  Maarten V. de Hoop,et al.  Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience , 2019, Science.

[44]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[45]  Yanfei Wang,et al.  Automated design of a convolutional neural network with multi-scale filters for cost-efficient seismic data classification , 2020, Nature Communications.

[46]  A. Tarantola Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation , 1984 .

[47]  Peng Jiang,et al.  Deep-Learning Inversion of Seismic Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.