Regression modelling of diagnostic likelihood ratios for the evaluation of medical diagnostic tests.

The use of diagnostic likelihood ratios has been advocated in the epidemiologic literature for the past decade. Diagnostic likelihood ratios provide valuable information about the predictive properties of a diagnostic test while having the attractive feature of being independent of the prevalence of disease in the study population. We propose a new regression method that allows for direct assessment of covariate effects on likelihood ratios for binary diagnostic tests. This may be particularly useful in assessing how factors that are under the control of the clinician can be altered to maximize the predictive ability of the test. Similarly, patient characteristics that influence the ability of the test to discriminate between diseased and nondiseased subjects may be identified using the regression model. The regression method is flexible in that it can accommodate clustered data arising from a variety of study designs. We illustrate the method with data from an audiology study.

[1]  M S Pepe,et al.  Design of a study to improve accuracy in reading mammograms. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  W Leisenring,et al.  A marginal regression modelling framework for evaluating medical diagnostic tests. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  M P Gorga,et al.  The use of cumulative distributions to determine critical values and levels of confidence for clinical distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  M P Gorga,et al.  Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. , 1996, JAMA.

[6]  J. Hanley,et al.  The comparison of injury severity instrument performance using likelihood ratio and ROC curve analyses. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  E. Boyko,et al.  Ruling Out or Ruling In Disease with the Most sensitiue or Specific Diagnostic Test , 1994, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  M. Pepe,et al.  A cautionary note on inference for marginal regression models with longitudinal data and general correlated response data , 1994 .

[9]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  D B Matchar,et al.  Likelihood ratios for continuous test results--making the clinicians' job easier or harder? , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  G. Samsa,et al.  Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[13]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[14]  D. Sackett,et al.  The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Clinical Decision Analysis , 1980 .