An adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis of structures with multiple loading sequences

The response surface method (RSM) has been widely used in conjunction with non-linear finite element (NLFE) analysis to predict the reliability levels of structures that do not have explicit failure functions. In the present study, the solution of the reliability analysis initially diverged when the loading was applied in sequence in the NLFE analysis. A case study was performed in order to investigate the cause of the divergence. It was found that the divergence was mainly due to the non-smoothness of the response surface, and the quality and validity of the experimental design for numerical or NLFE analysis. An adaptive design approach is proposed to overcome these problems in reliability analysis, and several suggestions are made to improve the robustness of the RSM. Three numerical examples have been chosen to demonstrate the proposed method, which was verified by an independent Monte Carlo Simulation.

[1]  Palle Thoft-Christensen,et al.  Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications , 1982 .

[2]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[3]  I. Enevoldsen Experience with Probabilistic-based Assessment of Bridges , 2001 .

[4]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[5]  D Halden,et al.  AN OVERALL RISK-BASED ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE FOR SUB-STANDARD BRIDGES , 1997 .

[6]  Michel Ghosn SAFETY EVALUATION OF HIGHWAY BRIDGE STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS , 1996 .

[7]  William H. Press,et al.  Book-Review - Numerical Recipes in Pascal - the Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[8]  Fabio Casciati,et al.  Mathematical Models for Structural Reliability Analysis , 1996 .

[9]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[10]  G. Maymon,et al.  Probability of failure of structures without a closed-form failure function , 1993 .

[11]  Parag C. Das,et al.  Safety of bridges , 1997 .

[12]  J. P. Muzeau,et al.  Reliability Analysis with Implicit Formulations , 1997 .

[13]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[14]  C. Guedes Soares Probabilistic methods for structural design , 1997 .

[15]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  Reliability of Structures , 2000 .

[16]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[17]  Marios K. Chryssanthopoulos Probabilistic buckling analysis of plates and shells , 1998 .

[18]  Jacques Labeyrie,et al.  Response Surface Methodology in Structural Reliability , 1997 .

[19]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates , 2001 .

[20]  Niels C. Lind,et al.  Methods of structural safety , 2006 .

[21]  L. Faravelli Response‐Surface Approach for Reliability Analysis , 1989 .

[22]  Sami W. Tabsh,et al.  RELIABILITY OF HIGHWAY GIRDER BRIDGES , 1991 .