Auditory Distraction in Semantic Memory: A Process-Based Approach.

Five experiments demonstrate auditory-semantic distraction in tests of memory for semantic category-exemplars. The effects of irrelevant sound on category-exemplar recall are shown to be functionally distinct from those found in the context of serial short-term memory by showing sensitivity to: The lexical-semantic, rather than acoustic, properties of sound (Experiment 1) and between-sequence semantic similarity (Experiments 1–5) but only under conditions in which the task is free, not serial, recall (Experiment 3) and when the irrelevant sound items are dominant members of a semantic category (Experiment 4). The experiments also reveal evidence of a breakdown of a source-monitoring process under conditions of between-sequence semantic similarity (Experiments 2–5). Results are discussed in terms of activation and inhibition accounts and support a dynamic, process-oriented, rather than a structurally based, account of forgetting.

[1]  C. Philip Beaman,et al.  Auditory distraction from low‐intensity noise: a review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments , 2005 .

[2]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000) , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. , 1996 .

[4]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Role of Serial Order in the Irrelevant Speech Effect: Tests of the Changing-State Hypothesis , 1997 .

[5]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[6]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[7]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working Memory and Language , 2018, Working Memories.

[8]  K. McDermott,et al.  False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Dewey Rundus,et al.  Negative effects of using list items as recall cues , 1973 .

[10]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Seeing or hearing? Perceptual independence, modality confusions, and crossmodal congruity effects with focused and divided attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall. , 1998 .

[12]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[13]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[14]  The use of source memory to identify one's own episodic confusion errors. , 2001 .

[15]  S. Tipper,et al.  Behavioural Goals Determine Inhibitory Mechanisms of Selective Attention , 1994 .

[16]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  D. G. Payne,et al.  Dual-retrieval processes in free and associative recall. , 2002 .

[18]  D. Navon.  Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[19]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[20]  I. Neath.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Alastair P. Nicholls,et al.  The irrelevant sound effect: does speech play a special role? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Mary Ann Foley,et al.  Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring , 1981 .

[23]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of comprehension by the meaning of irrelevant sound , 2000, Memory.

[24]  Murray Glanzer,et al.  Storage Mechanisms in Recall , 1972 .

[25]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect , 1986 .

[26]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  A model for interference and forgetting , 1988 .

[27]  K. McDermott.  The Persistence of False Memories in List Recall , 1996 .

[28]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[29]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Trey Hedden,et al.  Category norms as a function of culture and age: comparisons of item responses to 105 categories by american and chinese adults. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[32]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  A negative order-repetition priming effect: inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[36]  J. S. Nairne.  A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[37]  B. DeSchepper,et al.  An inhibition-based fan effect : Evidence for an active suppression mechanism in selective attention , 1992 .

[38]  S. Lupker,et al.  Phonological and semantic priming: Evidence for task-independent effects , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[39]  J. Read,et al.  From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech : Implications for the structure of working memory , 1982 .

[41]  Alan B. Welsh,et al.  Acoustic masking in primary memory. , 1976 .

[42]  Jason L Hicks,et al.  Backward associative strength determines source attributions given to false memories , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  W. A. Bousfield.  The Occurrence of Clustering in the Recall of Randomly Arranged Associates , 1953 .

[44]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  The nature of remembering : essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder , 2001 .

[46]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis , 1995 .

[47]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Retrieval strategies in recall of natural categories and categorized lists. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  Karl-Heinz T. Bäuml,et al.  Strong items get suppressed, weak items do not: The role of item strength in output interference , 1998 .

[49]  D. C. Lecompte,et al.  The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[50]  John R. Anderson,et al.  RECOGNITION AND RETRIEVAL PROCESSES IN FREE RECALL , 1972 .

[51]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Working memory capacity and resistance to interference , 2004 .

[52]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  On the Irrelevance of Semantic Information for the “Irrelevant Speech” Effect , 1996 .

[53]  A. Allport.  Attention and control: have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years , 1993 .

[54]  Cynthia M. Sifonis,et al.  Category structure and created memories , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[55]  M. Castillo,et al.  Phonological coding in reading comprehension: The importance of individual differences , 1995 .

[56]  C Philip Beaman,et al.  The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: what role for working memory capacity? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect : Implications for phonological coding in working memory , 1993 .

[58]  N. Franklin,et al.  Cross-modal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory? , 1990 .

[60]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music , 1988 .

[62]  D C LeCompte,et al.  Irrelevant speech and irrelevant tones: the relative importance of speech to the irrelevant speech effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  Gordon D A Brown,et al.  Modeling age-related differences in immediate memory using SIMPLE. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[65]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  SAM: A theory of probabilistic search in associative memory. , 1980 .

[66]  Michael C. Anderson.  Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. , 2003 .

[67]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Memory: Handbook of Perception and Cognition , 1996 .

[68]  James H. Neely,et al.  Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. , 2001 .