Left visual field attentional advantage in judging simultaneity and temporal order.

Dynamic environments often contain features that vary simultaneously as well as features that vary sequentially. In principle, the correspondingly distinct sensations of simultaneity and temporal order could arise from a single shared neural computation that involves differencing two arrival times. On the other hand, simultaneity judgments (SJs) and temporal order judgments (TOJs) have distinct informational requirements that could be optimized by distinct neural events. To explore overlap in the neural events mediating SJs and TOJs, the present experiments built on recent reports that SJ precision in the left visual field (LVF) exceeds that in the right visual field (RVF). Participants completed divided attention tasks requiring either SJs or TOJs to LVF or RVF targets. SJs exhibited a significant LVF advantage, as expected. TOJs also exhibited a significant LVF advantage. Specifically, simply repositioning targets from the LVF to the RVF generated mean TOJ threshold increases (temporal precision reductions) between 39% and 57%, an effect size equivalent to approximately two LVF detectors for each RVF detector. Control experiments indicated that this LVF advantage reflected the temporal resolution of visual attention, rather than lower-level flicker discrimination or masking. These findings constitute additional evidence for an LVF advantage in time-sensitive attentional tasks and further contradict our subjective experience of homogenous temporal precision across the visual field.

[1]  Jenna G. Kelly,et al.  Bilateral attentional advantage on elementary visual tasks , 2009, Vision Research.

[2]  R. Verleger,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[3]  K. Dobkins,et al.  Effects of spatial attention on motion discrimination are greater in the left than right visual field , 2012, Vision Research.

[4]  Felix A Wichmann,et al.  When luminance increment thresholds depend on apparent lightness. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[5]  A. Holcombe,et al.  Exhausting attentional tracking resources with a single fast-moving object , 2012, Cognition.

[6]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[7]  Elena K. Festa,et al.  Remapping time across space. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[8]  S. Nishida,et al.  Marker Correspondence, Not Processing Latency, Determines Temporal Binding of Visual Attributes , 2002, Current Biology.

[9]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[10]  A. Pantle,et al.  Using low-level filters to encode spatial displacements of visual stimuli. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[11]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[12]  R. Ulrich Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[14]  S. Shipp Interhemispheric integration in visual search , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Visual extinction and prior entry: Impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Jenna G. Kelly,et al.  Attentional oblique effect when judging simultaneity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[17]  L. Allan The relationship between judgments ofsuccessiveness and judgments of order , 1975 .

[18]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Nestor Matthews,et al.  Right hemifield deficits in judging simultaneity: a perceptual learning study. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[20]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[21]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  On Why Left Events are the Right Ones: Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Left-hemifield Advantage in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Unilateral Right Parietal Damage Leads to Bilateral Deficit for High-Level Motion , 2001, Neuron.

[23]  Jonathan Vaughan,et al.  Delay of stimulus presentation after the saccade in visual search , 1977 .

[24]  R. Verleger,et al.  Cooperation or Competition of the Two Hemispheres in Processing Characters Presented at Vertical Midline , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Critical flicker frequency and M-scaling of stimulus size and retinal illuminance , 1984, Vision Research.

[26]  Sébastien M. Crouzet,et al.  Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[27]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Bilateral deficits of transient visual attention in right parietal patients. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[29]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  I can see you better if I can hear you coming: action-consistent sounds facilitate the visual detection of human gait. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[30]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The ‘when’ parietal pathway explored by lesion studies , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  Rapid global form binding with loss of associated colors. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[32]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Bilateral Field Advantage in Visual Enumeration , 2011, PLoS ONE.

[33]  Alex O Holcombe,et al.  Object tracking: absence of long-range spatial interference supports resource theories. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[34]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Temporal limits of long-range phase discrimination across the visual field , 2007, Vision Research.

[35]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.

[36]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding , 2009, Vision Research.

[37]  U. Mosimann,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry in visuospatial attention assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[39]  T Ledgeway The detection of second-order motion in the human visual system. , 1994 .

[40]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Corballis,et al.  Effect of luminance on successiveness discrimination in the absence of the corpus callosum , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Determinants of eye-fixation duration. , 1980, The American journal of psychology.

[43]  Paige E. Scalf,et al.  Double take: parallel processing by the cerebral hemispheres reduces attentional blink. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[45]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[46]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based motion perception. , 1992, Science.

[47]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[48]  M. Corballis,et al.  Visual-field asymmetry in dual-stream RSVP , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.5 The ‘when ’ pathway of the right parietal lobe , 2022 .

[50]  D Purves,et al.  Temporal events in cyclopean vision. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  L. Thompson,et al.  Effects of senescence on the temporal resolution of somesthetic stimuli presented to one hand or both. , 1968, Journal of gerontology.

[52]  W Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[53]  R. Verleger,et al.  Left visual-field advantage in the dual-stream RSVP task and reading-direction: A study in three nations , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  L. Allan The relationship between judgments of successiveness , 1975 .

[55]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Hemifield Effects in Multiple Identity Tracking , 2012, PloS one.

[56]  D.,et al.  Visual Responses to Time-Dependent Stimuli . * I . Amplitude Sensitivity , 2004 .

[57]  G. Sperling Temporal and Spatial Visual Masking. I. Masking by Impulse Flashes , 1965 .

[58]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[59]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  R. Verleger,et al.  The left visual-field advantage in rapid visual presentation is amplified rather than reduced by posterior-parietal rTMS , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[62]  H. Pashler,et al.  Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[63]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[64]  C. Spence,et al.  Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[65]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Sex-specific norms code face identity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[66]  A. Holcombe Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  S. Nishida,et al.  Audio–tactile superiority over visuo–tactile and audio–visual combinations in the temporal resolution of synchrony perception , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[68]  M. Mesulam Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[69]  Ki-Hyun Kim,et al.  The role of the right posterior parietal cortex in temporal order judgment , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[70]  P. Howe,et al.  Resource demands of object tracking and differential allocation of the resource , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[71]  G. Sperling,et al.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[72]  Nestor Matthews,et al.  Task-specific perceptual learning on speed and direction discrimination , 2003, Vision Research.

[73]  B. Dosher,et al.  The dynamics of perceptual learning: an incremental reweighting model. , 2005, Psychological review.

[74]  P. Werkhoven,et al.  Visual processing of optic acceleration , 1992, Vision Research.

[75]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes , 2013, Front. Psychol..