Incorporating storage as a flexible transmission asset in power system operation procedure

Managing uncertainty caused by the large-scale integration of wind power is a challenge in both the day-ahead planning and real-time operation of a power system. Increasing system flexibility is the key factor in preserving operational reliability. While distributed energy storage is a promising way to increase system flexibility, its benefits have to be optimally exploited to justify its high installation cost. Optimally operating distributed energy storage in an uncertain environment requires decisions on multiple time scales. Additionally, storage operation needs to be coordinated with the scheduling and dispatching of conventional generators. This paper proposes and demonstrates a three-level framework for coordinating day-ahead, near real-time and minute-by-minute control actions of conventional generating units and distributed energy storage. A case study illustrates the interactions between the three levels and the effectiveness of this approach both in terms of economics and operational reliability.

[1]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Near-Optimal Method for Siting and Sizing of Distributed Storage in a Transmission Network , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Yang Wang,et al.  Unit Commitment With Volatile Node Injections by Using Interval Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Xu Andy Sun,et al.  Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Richard D. Christie,et al.  Energy storage effects on day-ahead operation of power systems with high wind penetration , 2011, 2011 North American Power Symposium.

[5]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Coupling Pumped Hydro Energy Storage With Unit Commitment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[6]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[7]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Model-Predictive Cascade Mitigation in Electric Power Systems With Storage and Renewables—Part II: Case-Study , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Model-Predictive Cascade Mitigation in Electric Power Systems With Storage and Renewables—Part I: Theory and Implementation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Comparison of state-of-the-art transmission constrained unit commitment formulations , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[10]  Kory W. Hedman,et al.  Economic Assessment of Energy Storage in Systems With High Levels of Renewable Resources , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[11]  John R. Birge,et al.  A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem , 1996 .

[12]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[13]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Toward Cost-Efficient and Reliable Unit Commitment Under Uncertainty , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Optimal power flow with storage , 2014, 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference.