The Tyndall decarbonisation scenarios—Part I: Development of a backcasting methodology with stakeholder participation

The Tyndall decarbonisation scenarios project has outlined alternative pathways whereby a 60% reduction in CO2 emissions from 1990 levels by 2050, a goal adopted by the UK Government, can be achieved. This paper, Part I of a two part paper, describes the methodology used to develop the scenarios and outlines the motivations for the project. The study utilised a backcasting approach, applied in three phases. In phase one, a set of credible and consistent end-points that described a substantially decarbonised energy system in 2050 were generated and reviewed by stakeholders. In phase two, pathways were developed to achieve the transition to the desired end-point. The impacts of the scenarios were assessed in phase three, by means of a deliberative multi-criteria assessment framework. The scenarios to emerge from this process are elaborated in Part II, and conclusions drawn in relation to the feasibility of achieving the 60% target.

[1]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[2]  P. Ekins,et al.  Different scenarios for achieving radical reduction in carbon emissions: A decomposition analysis , 2009 .

[3]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Citizens and specialists deliberate options for managing the UK's legacy intermediate and high level radio-active waste: A report of the Deliberative Mapping Trial, June-July 2004. , 2004 .

[4]  John Robinson Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning , 2003 .

[5]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[6]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Prioritising the issues in Local Environment Agency Plans through consensus building with stakeholder groups , 1998 .

[7]  T Blundell ENERGY: THE CHANGING CLIMATE. 22ND REPORT OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION , 2000 .

[8]  W. McDowall,et al.  Forecasts, scenarios, visions, backcasts and roadmaps to the hydrogen economy: A review of the hydrogen futures literature , 2006 .

[9]  Clair Gough,et al.  The Use of Integrated Assessment: An Institutional Analysis Perspective , 2001 .

[10]  John Robinson Energy backcasting A proposed method of policy analysis , 1982 .

[11]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  Visions for a sustainable Europe , 2000 .

[12]  Sarah Mander,et al.  Decarbonising modern societies: integrated scenarios process and workshop: Tyndall Centre Technical Report No 48 , 2006 .

[13]  Nick Eyre Carbon reduction in the real world: how the UK will surpass its Kyoto obligations , 2001 .

[14]  Axel Lauer,et al.  Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years , 2005 .

[15]  P. Hennicke,et al.  SCENARIOS FOR A ROBUST POLICY MIX: THE FINAL REPORT OF THE GERMAN STUDY COMMISSION ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLY , 2004 .

[16]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[17]  Paul Dewick,et al.  Technological change, industry structure and the environment , 2004 .

[18]  H. Vos Trade and Industry , 1946 .

[19]  Simon Shackley,et al.  The greenhouse gas regional inventory project (GRIP): Designing and employing a regional greenhouse gas measurement tool for stakeholder use , 2009 .

[20]  A. Haines Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Book review] , 2003 .

[21]  Kevin Anderson,et al.  Reconciling the electricity industry with sustainable development: Backcasting - A strategic alternative , 2001 .

[22]  Peter F. Chapman Three energy scenarios for the United Kingdom , 1976 .

[23]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Futures under glass , 1990 .

[24]  Clair Gough,et al.  Towards a Multi-Criteria Methodology for Assessment of Geological Carbon Storage Options , 2006 .

[25]  B. Boardman Achieving energy efficiency through product policy: the UK experience , 2004 .

[26]  J. Hertin,et al.  Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’ , 2002 .

[27]  K. Dreborg Essence of backcasting , 1996 .

[28]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  An updated scenario typology , 2003 .

[29]  Alice Bows,et al.  Policy Clash: Can Projected Aviation Growth be Reconciled with the UK Government's 60% Carbon-Reduction Target? , 2007 .

[30]  P. Ekins,et al.  The Eight Scenarios Developed by the Tyndall Integrated Scenarios Project: As discussed at the first project workshop on November 30th 2004 University of Manchester , 2004 .

[31]  A. Lovins,et al.  Soft energy paths , 1978, Nature.

[32]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development , 2006 .

[33]  Suzanne A Pierce,et al.  The energy challenge , 2008, Nature.

[34]  Abigail L. Bristow,et al.  What is a sustainable level of CO2 emissions from transport activity in the UK in 2050 , 2005 .

[35]  Robert Lowe,et al.  An exploration of the technical feasibility of achieving CO2 emission reductions in excess of 60% within the UK housing stock by the year 2050 , 2005 .

[36]  A. Lovins Energy strategy , 1976, Nature.

[37]  Paul Cullinane,et al.  United Kingdom national accounts , 1984 .

[38]  S. D. Probert,et al.  French energy policy , 1998 .

[39]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[40]  Alan Bullock,et al.  The Fontana dictionary of modern thought , 1977 .

[41]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The Consequences of CO2 Stabilisation for the Impacts of Climate Change , 2002 .