Assessment of acute head injury in an emergency department population using sport concussion assessment tool – 3rd edition

ABSTRACT Sport Concussion Assessment Tool version 3 (SCAT-3) is one of the most widely researched concussion assessment tools in athletes. Here normative data for SCAT3 in nonathletes are presented. The SCAT3 was administered to 98 nonathlete healthy controls, as well as 118 participants with head-injury and 46 participants with other body trauma (OI) presenting to the ED. Reference values were derived and classifier functions were built to assess the accuracy of SCAT3. The control population had a mean of 2.30 (SD = 3.62) symptoms, 4.38 (SD = 8.73) symptom severity score (SSS), and 26.02 (SD = 2.52) standardized assessment of concussion score (SAC). Participants were more likely to be diagnosed with a concussion (from among healthy controls) if the SSS > 7; or SSS ≤ 7 and SAC ≤22 (sensitivity = 96%, specificity = 77%). Identification of head injury patients from among both, healthy controls and body trauma was possible using rule SSS > 7 and headache or pressure in head present, or SSS ≤ 7 and SAC ≤ 22 (sensitivity = 87%, specificity = 80%). In this current study, the SCAT-3 provided high sensitivity to discriminate acute symptoms of TBI in the ED setting. Individuals with a SSS > 7 and headache or pressure in head, or SSS ≤ 7 but with a SAC ≤ 22 within 48-hours of an injury should undergo further testing.

[1]  FineblitSamuel,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life after Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury/Concussion: A Systematic Review , 2016 .

[2]  K. Russell,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life after Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury/Concussion: A Systematic Review. , 2016, Journal of neurotrauma.

[3]  J. Parkkari,et al.  Sport concussion assessment tool - 3rd edition - normative reference values for professional ice hockey players. , 2016, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[4]  J. E. Greer,et al.  Increased Network Excitability Due to Altered Synaptic Inputs to Neocortical Layer V Intact and Axotomized Pyramidal Neurons after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2015, Journal of neurotrauma.

[5]  W. Barr,et al.  Utility of the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) to Detect Insufficient Effort in Independent Medical Examinations and Civil Litigation Cases , 2015, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[6]  H. Levin,et al.  Diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management of mild traumatic brain injury , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[7]  G. Iverson,et al.  Advanced topics in neuropsychological assessment following sport-related concussion , 2015, Brain injury.

[8]  G. Manley,et al.  Classification of traumatic brain injury: past, present, and future. , 2015, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[9]  R. Naunheim,et al.  CT positive brain injury in mild TBI patients presenting with normal SAC scores. , 2014, Military medicine.

[10]  R. Bauer,et al.  A Normative Study of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) in Children and Adolescents , 2014, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[11]  G. Iverson,et al.  Sport concussion assessment tool 2 in a civilian trauma sample with mild traumatic brain injury. , 2014, Journal of neurotrauma.

[12]  Stephen E. Jones,et al.  Neural activation during response inhibition differentiates blast from mechanical causes of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. , 2014, Journal of Neurotrauma.

[13]  Michael Makdissi,et al.  Consensus statement on Concussion in Sport - The 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. , 2013, Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine.

[14]  K. Guskiewicz,et al.  Evidence-based approach to revising the SCAT2: introducing the SCAT3 , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[15]  K. Guskiewicz,et al.  American Medical Society for Sports Medicine Position Statement: Concussion in Sport , 2013, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[16]  J. Maroon,et al.  Postconcussion Syndrome: A Review of Pathophysiology and Potential Nonpharmacological Approaches to Treatment , 2012, The Physician and sportsmedicine.

[17]  I. Baguley,et al.  The prospective course of postconcussion syndrome: the role of mild traumatic brain injury. , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[18]  Michael S Ferrara,et al.  The Reliability of the Modified Balance Error Scoring System , 2009, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[19]  R. Cantu,et al.  Consensus statement on Concussion in Sport 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008. , 2009, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[20]  C. Atzema,et al.  Defining "therapeutically inconsequential" head computed tomographic findings in patients with blunt head trauma. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[21]  J. Borg,et al.  Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  P. Satz,et al.  Commentary and perspectives on R.M. Allen's "The test performance of the brain injured". , 2000, Journal of clinical psychology.

[23]  Allen Rm The test performance of the brain injured. 1947. , 2000 .

[24]  R. M. Allen The test performance of the brain injured. 1947. , 2000, Journal of clinical psychology.

[25]  J. Kelly,et al.  Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC): On-Site Mental Status Evaluation of the Athlete , 1998, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[26]  H. Ansbacher CURTAILMENT OF MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY IN GERMANY. , 1943, Science.