The Use of Skin Surface Electropotentials for Breast Cancer Detection—Preliminary Clinical Trial Results Obtained Using the Biofield Diagnostic System

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of the Biofield Diagnostic System (BDS) as an adjunct to established diagnostic techniques such as mammography and ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. The clinical trial was conducted at the Tan Tock Seng hospital, Singapore. 103 women scheduled for mammography and/or ultrasound tests participated in the study. The BDS test recorded a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 97.6%, and an accuracy of 98.1%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.988 which was slightly lower than that of ultrasound (0.994) and slightly higher than that of mammography (0.951). The BDS test has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity values in the studied population. The accuracy is also comparable to that of diagnostic techniques like mammography and ultrasound. Thus, it is evident that BDS can be a fast and reliable adjunct tool for getting a secondary opinion on lesions with indeterminate mammographic and sonographic results.

[1]  Zhenyu Guo,et al.  A review of electrical impedance techniques for breast cancer detection. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  R H Bayford,et al.  Bioimpedance tomography (electrical impedance tomography). , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[3]  K. T. Moesta,et al.  Time-domain optical mammography: initial clinical results on detection and characterization of breast tumors. , 2003, Applied optics.

[4]  David S. Holder,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography : Methods, History and Applications , 2004 .

[5]  Volker Barth,et al.  Electropotential measurements as a new diagnostic modality for breast cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[6]  L. Sha,et al.  A review of dielectric properties of normal and malignant breast tissue , 2002, Proceedings IEEE SoutheastCon 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37283).

[7]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Werner A. Kaiser,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning as a new imaging modality in breast cancer detection—a short review of clinical value on breast application, limitations and perspectives , 2003 .

[9]  Eddie Yin-Kwee Ng,et al.  A Framework for Early Discovery of Breast Tumor Using Thermography with Artificial Neural Network , 2003, The breast journal.

[10]  R Holland,et al.  Electropotential evaluation as a new technique for diagnosing breast lesions. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[11]  T. Hope,et al.  Technology review: The use of electrical impedance scanning in the detection of breast cancer , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[12]  John B Weaver,et al.  Initial in vivo experience with steady‐state subzone‐based MR elastography of the human breast , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  V. Sacchini,et al.  Report of the European School of Oncology task force on Electropotentials in the Clinical Assessment of Neoplasia , 1996 .

[14]  H. Gallager,et al.  Early phases in the development of breast cancer , 1969, Cancer.

[15]  Susumu Yamaguchi,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Skin Surface Electropotentials in Japanese Patients with Suspicious Breast Lesions , 1996, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[16]  Paul M. Meaney,et al.  Enhancing breast tumor detection with near-field imaging , 2002 .

[17]  David Gur,et al.  Prospective study of electrical impedance scanning for identifying young women at risk for breast cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[18]  David Gur,et al.  Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Martina Dickhaut,et al.  The Value of BBE in the Assessment of Breast Lesions , 1996 .

[20]  E. Feuer,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 , 2006 .

[21]  R J Davies,et al.  Transmural electrical potential difference as an early marker in colon cancer. , 1986, Archives of surgery.

[22]  J. M. Dixon.  Electropotentials in the Clinical Assessment of Breast Neoplasia , 1996, ESO Monographs.