Prostate cancer characterization by optical contrast enhanced photoacoustics

During the past decades, prostate cancer (PCa), with an annual incident rate much higher than any other cancer, is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in American men. PCa has a relatively low progression rate yet the survival percentage decreases dramatically once the cancer has metastasized. Identifying aggressive from indolent PCa to prevent metastasis and death is critical to improving outcomes for patients with PCa. Standard procedure for assessing the aggressiveness of PCa involves the removal of tumor tissues by transrectal (TR) ultrasound (US) guided needle biopsy. The microscopic architecture of the biopsied tissue is visualized by histological or immunohistochemical staining procedures. The heterogeneity of the microscopic architecture is characterized by a Gleason score, a quantitative description of the aggressiveness of PCa. Due to the inability to identify the cancer cells, most noninvasive imaging modalities can only provide diagnosis of PCa at limited accuracy. This study investigates the feasibility of identifying PCa tumors and characterizing the aggressiveness of PCa by photoacoustic imaging assisted by cancer targeting polyacrylamide (PAA) nanoparticles (NPs). PAA is a biocompatible material used in clinics for the past 20 years. PAA NPs can protect capsulated optical contrast agents from interference by enzymes and enable prolonged systematic circulation in the living biological environment. The cancer targeting mechanism is achieved by conjugating the NPs to F3 peptides, which trace nucleolin overexpressed on the surface of cancer cells. Preliminary studies have shown that the NPs are capable of staining the PCa cells in vivo.

[1]  Po-Yuan Lin,et al.  Detection of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), a biomarker of prostate cancer, in patient blood samples using a nanoparticle electrochemical biosensor. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  J. Presti,et al.  Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough? , 2003, Urologic oncology.

[3]  Oren Sagher,et al.  Targeted blue nanoparticles as photoacoustic contrast agent for brain tumor delineation , 2011, Nano research.

[4]  Raoul Kopelman,et al.  Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer. , 2008, Nano letters.

[5]  D. Gleason,et al.  Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective. , 1992, Human pathology.

[6]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustic tomography for structural and functional in vivo imaging of the brain , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Sheng-Wen Huang,et al.  Indocyanine-green-embedded PEBBLEs as a contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  Yu Zhou,et al.  Real-time photoacoustic and ultrasound dual-modality imaging system facilitated with graphics processing unit and code parallel optimization , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  A. Zisman,et al.  The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Peter Wust,et al.  Thermotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: feasibility, imaging, and three-dimensional temperature distribution. , 2007, European urology.

[11]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  Dong Liang,et al.  Peptide-conjugated polymeric micellar nanoparticles for Dual SPECT and optical imaging of EphB4 receptors in prostate cancer xenografts. , 2011, Biomaterials.