Exploratory Analysis of Collaborative Web Accessibility Improvement

The Web is becoming a platform for daily activities and is expanding the opportunities for collaboration among people all over the world. The effects of these innovations are seen not only in major Web services such as wikis and social networking services but also in accessibility services. Collaborative accessibility improvement has great potential to make the Web more adaptive. Screen reader users, developers, site owners, and any Web volunteers who want to help the users are invited into the activities to improve accessibility in a timely manner. The Social Accessibility Project is an experimental service for a new needs-driven improvement model based on collaborative metadata authoring technologies. In 20 months, about 19,000 pieces of metadata were created for more than 3,000 Web pages through collaboration based on 355 requests submitted from users. We encountered many challenges as we sought to create a new mainstream approach and created distinctive features in new user interfaces to address some of these challenges. Although the new features increased user participation, serious issues remain. The productivity of the volunteers exceeded our expectations, but we found large and important problems in the users’ lack of awareness of their own accessibility problems. This is a critical problem for sustaining the active use of the service, because about 70% of the improvement starts with a request from a user. Helping users with visual impairments understand the actual issues is a crucial and challenging topic, and will lead to improved accessibility. We first introduce examples of collaboration, analyze several kinds of statistics on the activities of the users and volunteers of the pilot service, and then discuss our findings and challenges. Five future foci are considered: site-wide metadata authoring, encouraging active participation by users, quality management for the created metadata, metadata for dynamic HTML applications, and collaborations with site owners.

[1]  Bill N. Schilit,et al.  Digestor: Device-Independent Access to the World Wide Web , 1997, Comput. Networks.

[2]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  What's Next? A Visual Editor for Correcting Reading Order , 2009, INTERACT.

[3]  Christopher Olston,et al.  What's new on the web?: the evolution of the web from a search engine perspective , 2004, WWW '04.

[4]  Junji Maeda,et al.  Site-wide annotation: reconstructing existing pages to be accessible , 2002, Assets '02.

[5]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Collaborative document production using quilt , 1988, CSCW '88.

[6]  Mari Abe,et al.  A Visual Approach to Authoring XPath Expressions , 2001, Extreme Markup Languages®.

[7]  Robert Wilensky,et al.  Robust intra-document locations , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[8]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  SADIe:: transcoding based on CSS , 2006, Assets '06.

[9]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Aibrowser for multimedia: introducing multimedia content accessibility for visually impaired users , 2007, Assets '07.

[10]  Daniela Cancila,et al.  Do text transcoders improve usability for disabled users? , 2005, W4A '05.

[11]  Bo Leuf,et al.  The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web , 2001 .

[12]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  Combining SADIe and AxsJAX to improve the accessibility of web content , 2009, W4A.

[13]  David Bargeron,et al.  Robust annotation positioning in digital documents , 2001, CHI.

[14]  Helen Petrie,et al.  Remote usability evaluations With disabled people , 2006, CHI.

[15]  Marco Roccetti,et al.  Notes for a Collaboration: On the Design of a Wiki-type Educational Video Lecture Annotation System , 2007, International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC 2007).

[16]  Markel Vigo,et al.  Enriching web information scent for blind users , 2009, Assets '09.

[17]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Accessmonkey: a collaborative scripting framework for web users and developers , 2007, W4A '07.

[18]  T. V. Raman,et al.  AxsJAX: a talking translation bot using google IM: bringing web-2.0 applications to life , 2008, W4A '08.

[19]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Intermediaries personalize information streams , 2000, CACM.

[20]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  WebInSight:: making web images accessible , 2006, Assets '06.

[21]  Jennifer Mankoff,et al.  Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind , 2005, CHI.

[22]  Junji Maeda,et al.  Accessibility designer: visualizing usability for the blind , 2004, Assets '04.

[23]  Mari Abe,et al.  Robust pointing by XPath language: authoring support and empirical evaluation , 2003, 2003 Symposium on Applications and the Internet, 2003. Proceedings..

[24]  Marco Roccetti,et al.  E-learning 2.0: you are We-LCoME! , 2008, W4A '08.

[25]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Collaborative web accessibility improvement: challenges and possibilities , 2009, Assets '09.

[26]  I. V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  The HearSay non-visual web browser , 2007, W4A '07.

[27]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Transcoding proxy for nonvisual web access , 2000, Assets '00.

[28]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Social accessibility: achieving accessibility through collaborative metadata authoring , 2008, Assets '08.

[29]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Analysis of navigability of Web applications for improving blind usability , 2007, TCHI.

[30]  Marco Roccetti,et al.  Notes for a Collaboration: On the Design of a Wiki-type Educational Video Lecture Annotation System , 2007 .

[31]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Accessibility commons: a metadata infrastructure for web accessibility , 2008, Assets '08.

[32]  Takashi Itoh,et al.  Accessibility Evaluation for Multimedia Content , 2007, HCI.