Multiple sources in advertising appeals: When product endorsers are paid by the advertising sponsor

Previous research has shown that respondents who are exposed to multiple sources featured in an advertising appeal engage in more diligent processing of the message arguments than those who are exposed to a single message source presenting the same basic appeal. Other research has demonstrated that the persuasive advantage of an appeal can be significantly diminished when respondents perceive that the message source is motivated by the compensation received to endorse a product. Using a 2 (Single vs. Multiple Sources)×2 (Paid vs. Unpaid Source) between-subjects factorial design, subjects were shown a print advertisement for a new multivitamin food supplement. Results showed that subjects exposed to unpaid multiple sources generated significantly more positive thoughts and attitudes than those exposed to a similar number of sources who were paid to endorse the product. In contrast, subjects in the single-source conditions showed no significant differences in the number of thoughts and the strength of attitudes in response to paid versus unpaid message sources. Theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Terence A. Shimp.  Methods of Commercial Presentation Employed by National Television Advertisers , 1976 .

[2]  L. Phillips,et al.  The persuasive effect of source credibility: a situational analysis. , 1978, Public opinion quarterly.

[3]  Ida E. Berger,et al.  The Effect of Advertising on Attitude Accessibility, Attitude Confidence, and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship , 1989 .

[4]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. , 1987 .

[5]  S. Harkins,et al.  Information Utility and the Multiple Source Effect , 1987 .

[6]  Richard M. Sparkman.  The Discounting Principle in the Perception of Advertising , 1982 .

[7]  Robert R. Harmon,et al.  The Persuasive Effects of Source Credibility in Buy and Lease Situations , 1982 .

[8]  David J. Moore,et al.  Source Magnification: The Role of Multiple Sources in the Processing of Advertising Appeals , 1987 .

[9]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities? , 1977 .

[10]  D. L. Moore,et al.  Time Compression, Response Opportunity, and Persuasion , 1986 .

[11]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Social Context Effects in Persuasion: The Effects of Multiple Sources and Multiple Targets , 1983 .

[12]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  Communicator Attributes and Persuasion , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[13]  W. Joseph,et al.  The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review , 1982 .

[14]  Michael Etgar.  Effects of Administrative Control on Efficiency of Vertical Marketing Systems , 1976 .

[15]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context , 1989 .

[16]  Roobina Ohanian.  The impact of celebrity spokespersons' perceived image on consumers' intention to purchase. , 1991 .

[17]  R. Lutz.  Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad : A conceptual framework , 1985 .

[18]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[19]  Grant Mccracken.  Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process , 1989 .

[20]  Carol J. Williams,et al.  The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process , 1989 .

[21]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size , 1993 .

[22]  P. Homer,et al.  Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective , 1985 .

[23]  S. Harkins,et al.  Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. , 1981 .

[24]  P. Wright.  The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising , 1973 .

[25]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations , 1978 .

[26]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  The Multiple Source Effect in Persuasion , 1981 .

[27]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[28]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation , 1986 .

[29]  John C. Mowen,et al.  On Explaining and Predicting the Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsers , 1981 .

[30]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? , 1981 .

[31]  Gordon L. Patzer,et al.  Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness , 1983 .

[32]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.