The role of visual complexity and prototypicality regarding first impression of websites: Working towards understanding aesthetic judgments

This paper experimentally investigates the role of visual complexity (VC) and prototypicality (PT) as design factors of websites, shaping users' first impressions by means of two studies. In the first study, 119 screenshots of real websites varying in VC (low vs. medium vs. high) and PT (low vs. high) were rated on perceived aesthetics. Screenshot presentation time was varied as a between-subject factor (50ms vs. 500ms vs. 1000ms). Results reveal that VC and PT affect participants' aesthetics ratings within the first 50ms of exposure. In the second study presentation times were shortened to 17, 33 and 50ms. Results suggest that VC and PT affect aesthetic perception even within 17ms, though the effect of PT is less pronounced than the one of VC. With increasing presentation time the effect of PT becomes as influential as the VC effect. This supports the reasoning of the information-processing stage model of aesthetic processing (Leder et al., 2004), where VC is processed at an earlier stage than PT. Overall, websites with low VC and high PT were perceived as highly appealing.

[1]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users' experience, physiology, performance, and memory , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  What is Complexity? - The philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution , 1995 .

[3]  Colin Martindale,et al.  The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. , 1984 .

[4]  C. Martindale,et al.  Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. , 1990 .

[5]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Persuasive Design of Destination Web Sites: An Analysis of First Impression , 2008 .

[6]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design , 2005 .

[7]  B. Rolke,et al.  Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Gerrit Hirschfeld,et al.  High and low spatial frequencies in website evaluations , 2010, Ergonomics.

[9]  John Knight,et al.  Homepage aesthetics: The search for preference factors and the challenges of subjectivity , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[10]  G. Lindgaard,et al.  The impact of prototypicality on aesthetic evaluation: towards a better understanding of affective components of interface designs , 2008 .

[11]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Too Good to be Bad: The Effect of Favorable Expectations on Usability Perceptions , 2010 .

[12]  K. Karvonen.  Cultures of Trust: A Cross-Cultural Study on the Formation of Trust in an Electronic Environment , 2000 .

[13]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  First impressions last a lifetime: effect of interface type on disorientation and cognitive load , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  M. Bar,et al.  Very first impressions. , 2006, Emotion.

[15]  Paul van Schaik,et al.  The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over time , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Visual masking effects on duration, size, and form discrimination , 1976 .

[17]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Too good to be bad: Favorable product expectations boost subjective usability ratings , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[18]  P. Hekkert,et al.  'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[19]  T. Whitfield.  Beyond Prototypicality: Toward a Categorical-Motivation Model of Aesthetics , 2000 .

[20]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  The empirical determination of an aesthetic formula. , 1941 .

[21]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Priming of pop-out depends upon the current goals of observers. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[22]  F.R.H. Zijlstra,et al.  Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools , 1993 .

[23]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Judging web page visual appeal: do east and west really differ? , 2008 .

[24]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience , 2011, CHI.

[25]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  Mental models for web objects: Where do users expect to find the most frequent objects in online shops, news portals, and company web pages? , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[26]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  Visual complexity and aesthetic perception of web pages , 2008, SIGDOC '08.

[27]  P. V. Wieringen,et al.  Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings , 1990 .

[28]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[29]  David Robins,et al.  Aesthetics and credibility in web site design , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[30]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  The Role of Visual Complexity in Affective Reactions to Webpages: Subjective, Eye Movement, and Cardiovascular Responses , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[31]  J. Moran,et al.  Sensation and perception , 1980 .

[32]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  Facets of visual aesthetics , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Inference of Perceived Usability From Beauty , 2010, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[35]  Anand Kumar,et al.  Web Commercials and Advertising Hierarchy-of-Effects , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[36]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[37]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[38]  Gerrit Hirschfeld,et al.  Spatial frequencies in aesthetic website evaluations – explaining how ultra-rapid evaluations are formed , 2012, Ergonomics.

[39]  H. Leder,et al.  A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[40]  William Albert,et al.  Pre-Conscious Assessment of Trust: A Case Study of Financial and Health Care Web Sites , 2009 .

[41]  Jing Xing,et al.  Complexity and Automation Displays of Air Traffic Control Literature: Review and Analysis , 2005 .

[42]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages , 2011, TCHI.

[43]  N. Etcoff,et al.  Survival of the Prettiest: The Science of Beauty , 1999 .

[44]  R. Watson,et al.  The Influence of Home Page Complexity on Consumer Attention, Attitudes, and Purchase Intent , 2006 .

[45]  Kemal Yıldırım,et al.  Architecture and engineering students' evaluations of house façades: Preference, complexity and impressiveness , 2009 .

[46]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[47]  P. Perona,et al.  What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[48]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  Webpage Background and Viewer Attitudes , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[49]  Bo N. Schenkman,et al.  Aesthetics and preferences of web pages , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[50]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  S. Plous.  The psychology of judgment and decision making , 1994 .

[52]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Symmetry and aesthetics in website design: It's a man's business , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  R. Petty,et al.  Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological Issues , 1994 .

[54]  Joel L. Schrag,et al.  First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias , 1999 .

[55]  D. Berlyne.  Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .