Virtual Testing of Experimental Continuation

We present a critical advance in experimental testing of nonlinear structures. Traditional quasi-static experimental methods control the displacement or force at one or more load-introduction points on a structure. This approach is unable to traverse limit points in the control parameter, as the immediate equilibrium beyond these points is statically unstable, causing the structure to snap to another equilibrium. As a result, unstable equilibria---observed numerically---are yet to be verified experimentally. Based on previous experimental work, and a virtual testing environment developed herein, we propose a new experimental continuation method that can path-follow along unstable equilibria and traverse limit points. To support these developments, we provide insightful analogies between a fundamental building block of our technique---shape control---and analysis concepts such as the principle of virtual work and Galerkin's method. The proposed testing method will enable the validation of an emerging class of nonlinear structures that exploit instabilities for novel functionality.

[1]  Katia Bertoldi,et al.  Amplifying the response of soft actuators by harnessing snap-through instabilities , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Alberto Pirrera,et al.  Shape Control for Experimental Continuation. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[3]  Ryan L. Harne,et al.  A review of the recent research on vibration energy harvesting via bistable systems , 2013 .

[4]  Brian L. Wardle Solution to the Incorrect Benchmark Shell-Buckling Problem , 2008 .

[5]  Keith A. Seffen,et al.  Surface Texturing Through Cylinder Buckling , 2014 .

[6]  Michael Gomez,et al.  Passive Control of Viscous Flow via Elastic Snap-Through. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[7]  Emmanuel Virot,et al.  Stability Landscape of Shell Buckling. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[8]  K. Bertoldi,et al.  Negative Poisson's Ratio Behavior Induced by an Elastic Instability , 2010, Advanced materials.

[9]  Raf Theunissen,et al.  Adaptive compliant structures for flow regulation , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Rigoberto Burgueño,et al.  Tailoring the elastic postbuckling response of cylindrical shells: A route for exploiting instabilities in materials and mechanical systems , 2015 .

[11]  E. Riks An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems , 1979 .

[12]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review on Bistable Composite Laminates for Morphing and Energy Harvesting , 2015 .

[13]  Rigoberto Burgueño,et al.  Buckling-induced smart applications: recent advances and trends , 2015 .

[14]  J. Michael T. Thompson,et al.  Shock-Sensitivity in Shell-Like Structures: With Simulations of Spherical Shell Buckling , 2015, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[15]  Pedro M. Reis,et al.  A Perspective on the Revival of Structural (In) Stability With Novel Opportunities for Function: From Buckliphobia to Buckliphilia , 2015 .

[16]  Jongmin Shim,et al.  Buckling-induced encapsulation of structured elastic shells under pressure , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.