Parametric Effects on Particle Deposition in Abrasive Waterjet Surface Treatments

Abstract The abrasive waterjet (AWJ) has primarily been used for net-shape sectioning of engineering materials. In this study an AWJ was adopted for the surface treatment of commercially pure titanium (cpTi) and the contribution of treatment parameters to material removal and the deposition of particles within the substrate were examined. The surface texture and material removal rate were analyzed using conventional techniques whereas the quantity of abrasive particles embedded within the cpTi surfaces was determined using energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA). Parametric effects related to particle hardness were distinguished from a comparison of surfaces treated with Aluminum oxide, garnet, and crushed glass abrasives. According to an analysis of variance (ANOVA), treatment responses were found to be primarily dependent on the abrasive size, abrasive hardness, angle of incidence, and jet pressure. The minimum and maximum concentration of particles embedded in the AWJ treated cpTi (in percent surface area covered) was 2.5 and 21.6%, respectively. Particle concentration and mean particle size in the cpTi increased with abrasive size, angle of incidence and jet pressure; the particle concentration reached saturation at an angle of incidence near 80°. Although abrasive hardness was important to the treatment responses, an increase in hardness beyond 800 on the Rosiwal scale resulted in minimal changes in material removal or other features of the process.

[1]  D. Arola,et al.  Abrasive waterjet peening: a new method of surface preparation for metal orthopedic implants. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  Y. Yamauchi Suitable region of high-speed submerged water jets for cutting and peening , 1996 .

[3]  Sato Kazunori,et al.  Suitable Region of High-Speed Submerged Water Jets for Cutting and Peening. , 1995 .

[4]  J. Wigren Technical note: Grit blasting as surface preparation before plasma spraying☆ , 1988 .

[5]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  State of the Art of Research and Development in Abrasive Waterjet Machining , 1997 .

[6]  Annabeth L. Propst Understanding industrial experimentation , 1988 .

[7]  A. Beevers,et al.  The effects of grit-blasting on surface properties for adhesion , 1999 .

[8]  L. Wagner,et al.  Mechanical surface treatments on titanium, aluminum and magnesium alloys , 1999 .

[9]  Jian Lu,et al.  Alumina grit blasting parameters for surface preparation in the plasma spraying operation , 1997 .

[10]  D. Arolaa,et al.  Waterjet and abrasive waterjet surface treatment of titanium : a comparison of surface texture and residual stress , 2001 .

[11]  T. Senda,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of residual grits under angled blasting , 1999 .

[12]  Dwayne Arola,et al.  Waterjet and abrasive waterjet surface treatment of titanium: a comparison of surface texture and residual stress , 2001 .

[13]  Mohamed A. Hashish,et al.  Waterjet Machining and Peening of Metals , 2000 .

[14]  S. R. Daniewicz,et al.  Characterization of a Water Peening Process , 1999 .

[15]  J. Knapp,et al.  Waterjet roughened surface analysis and bond strength , 1996 .

[16]  Katsuhiko Hirano,et al.  X-Ray Study on Deformation and Fracture of Solid. Effects of Water Jet Peening on Corrosion Resistance and Fatigue Strength of Type 304 Stainless Steel. , 1996 .