The mechanical integrity of in vivo engineered heterotopic bone.

Recent advances in tissue engineering have aroused interest in growth of heterotopic bone for the repair of skeletal defects. This study demonstrates an in vivo method in minipigs of engineering individual human-sized mandible replacements of heterotopic bone with a mechanical integrity similar to natural bone. Ten individualized mandible replacement scaffolds were created using computer-aided design (CAD) techniques. Five had a resorbable external scaffold made of polylactite mesh (test group 1) and five had had a non-resorbable external scaffold of titanium mesh (test group 2). The mesh scaffolds were loaded each with five BioOss blocks serving as internal scaffolds and 3.5 mg recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-7. The loaded mesh scaffolds were implanted into the latissimus dorsi muscles of five infant minipigs. After 6 weeks the mandible replacements were harvested. Core biopsy cylinders were taken from the replacements of both test groups and from the natural pig mandibles (control 1). Also, core biopsies from plain BioOss Blocks were gained (control 2). The core biopsy cylinders were loaded axially into a compression test device to evaluate the mechanical compression resistance. Additional specimen underwent histological examination. Both test groups resulted in successful bone induction with degrees of compression resistance [Test 1: 1.62 MPa (SD+/-0.73); Test 2: 1.51 MPa (SD+/-0.56)] statistically insignificant when compared to natural porcine mandibular bone [1.75 MPa (SD+/-0.69)]. This differed significantly from the much lower compression resistance seen in the unadulterated BioOss [0.92 MPa (SD+/-0.04)]. Following this, the in vivo engineered bone has a similar mechanical compression stability as natural bone.

[1]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Osteoregulatory nature of mechanical stimuli: Function as a determinant for adaptive remodeling in bone , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  G. Zych,et al.  Osteogenic Protein-1 (Bone Morphogenetic Protein-7) in the Treatment of Tibial Nonunions: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing rhOP-1 with Fresh Bone Autograft* , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  B. Hasegawa,et al.  Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis. , 1991, Radiology.

[4]  J. Mao,et al.  Tissue-engineered Neogenesis of Human-shaped Mandibular Condyle from Rat Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[5]  I. Hvid,et al.  Trabecular bone strength patterns at the proximal tibial epiphysis , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  H. Eufinger,et al.  Growth and transplantation of a custom vascularised bone graft in a man , 2004, The Lancet.

[7]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[8]  A. van der Plas,et al.  Isolation and purification of osteocytes , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  S. Boonen,et al.  Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. , 1998, Endocrinology.

[10]  Bill C. Terry,et al.  Atlas of Craniomaxillofacial Osteosynthesis: Microplates, Miniplates, and Screws , 1999 .

[11]  D J Mooney,et al.  Smooth muscle cell adhesion to tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[12]  S Jepsen,et al.  Mandibular reconstruction with a prefabricated vascularized bone graft using recombinant human osteogenic protein-1: an experimental study in miniature pigs. Part I: Prefabrication. , 2001, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[13]  I. Springer,et al.  Carboxymethylcellulose-stabilized collagenous rhOP-1 device-a novel carrier biomaterial for the repair of mandibular continuity defects. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  Jeremy J Mao,et al.  Tissue-engineered osteochondral constructs in the shape of an articular condyle. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  L G Griffith,et al.  Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation, and matrix deposition. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[16]  D R Carter,et al.  Skeletal development and bone functional adaptation , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  Wei Sun,et al.  Computer‐aided tissue engineering: application to biomimetic modelling and design of tissue scaffolds , 2004, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[18]  Marcus Abboud,et al.  Bone graft versus BMP-7 in a critical size defect--cranioplasty in a growing infant model. , 2005, Bone.

[19]  S. Geiss,et al.  Particulated bone grafts--effectiveness of bone cell supply. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  I. Springer,et al.  RhBMP-7 improves survival and eruption in a growing tooth avulsion trauma model. , 2005, Bone.

[21]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Material properties of femoral cancellous bone in axial loading , 1980, Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery. Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie.

[22]  F. Linde,et al.  Compressive axial strain distributions in cancellous bone specimens. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.