: Systematic conservation planning requires rigorous methods. Methodological rigor and scientific defensibility are enhanced by conceptual frameworks, standards, and criteria for guiding and evaluating individual plans. The Wildlands Project is developing wildlands network designs in various regions across North America, based on the goals of rewilding—restoration of wilderness qualities and intact food webs—and biodiversity conservation. The project employs such modern conservation planning tools as spatially explicit habitat and population models and site-selection algorithms. I created a checklist to assist staff, contractors, and cooperators with the Wildlands Project in the development of regional conservation assessments and wildlands network designs that are consistent with currently accepted standards for science-based conservation planning. The checklist also has proven useful in the peer review of plans. The checklist consists of eight general standards, each of which includes several specific criteria that relate to the qualifications of staff, choice of biodiversity surrogates and goals, methodological comprehensiveness and rigor, replicability, analytic rigor, peer review, and overall quality of scholarship. Application of the checklist is meant to be flexible and to encourage creativity and innovation. Nevertheless, every plan must be scientifically defensible and must make the best use of available data, staff, and resources. Moreover, some degree of consistency is required to link individual plans together into a continental-scale network. The checklist may provide a template that other conservation organizations, agencies, scientists, and activists can adapt to their programs.
Resumen: La planeacion de conservacion sistematica requiere de metodos rigurosos. El rigor metodologico y la defensibilidad cientifica son reforzadas por marcos conceptuales, normas y criterios para guiar y evaluar planes individuales. El Proyecto Wildlands esta desarrollando disenos de redes de tierras silvestres en varias regiones de Norteamerica, con base en metas de restauracion de cualidades silvestres y redes alimenticias intactas y conservacion de la biodiversidad. El proyecto emplea muchas de las herramientas modernas de planeacion de conservacion tales como modelos de habitat y poblaciones espacialmente explicitos y algoritmos de seleccion de sitios. Compuse una lista de control para asistir al personal, contratistas y colaboradores del Proyecto Wildlands en el desarrollo de valoraciones regionales de conservacion y en el diseno de redes de tierras silvestres que son consistentes con las normas de planeacion cientifica de conservacion aceptadas actualmente. La lista de control tambien ha sido util para la revision por pares de los planes. La lista contiene ocho normas generales, cada una de las cuales incluye varios criterios especificos que se relacionan con la capacitacion del personal, seleccion de substitutos y metas de biodiversidad, comprension y rigor metodologico, replicabilidad, rigor analitico, revision por pares y calidad general de escolaridad. La aplicacion de la lista es flexible y alienta la creatividad e innovacion. Sin embargo, cada plan debe ser cientificamente defendible y debe hacer el mejor uso de datos disponibles, personal y recursos. Mas aun, se requiere de cierto nivel de consistencia para ligar los planes individuales a una red de escala continental. La lista puede proporcionar un templete que otras organizaciones, agencias, cientificos y activistas pueden adaptar a sus programas de conservacion.
[1]
J. Higgins,et al.
Planning for Biodiversity Conservation: Putting Conservation Science into Practice
,
2002
.
[2]
J. Terborgh,et al.
Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks
,
2000
.
[3]
Curtis M. Asher.
Results of Using Vendor-Supplied Analog Technology to Create a Virtual Collection: A Case Study
,
2000
.
[4]
Carlos Carroll,et al.
A Multicriteria Assessment of the Irreplaceability and Vulnerability of Sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
,
2002
.
[5]
J. Rappole,et al.
The Science of Conservation Planning: Habitat Conservation Under The Endangered Species Act
,
1997
.
[6]
Reed F. Noss,et al.
Saving Nature's Legacy: Protecting And Restoring Biodiversity
,
1994
.
[7]
J. Castilla,et al.
Challenges in the Quest for Keystones
,
1996
.
[8]
R. Haight,et al.
A Regional Landscape Analysis and Prediction of Favorable Gray Wolf Habitat in the Northern Great Lakes Region
,
1995
.
[9]
B. Richter,et al.
Biodiversity Conservation at Multiple Scales: Functional Sites, Landscapes, and Networks
,
2000
.
[10]
R. Noss,et al.
CARNIVORES AS FOCAL SPECIES FOR CONSERVATION PLANNING IN THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION
,
2001
.
[11]
M. Boyce,et al.
Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions.
,
1999,
Trends in ecology & evolution.
[12]
S. Sarkar,et al.
Systematic conservation planning
,
2000,
Nature.
[13]
Robert L. Pressey,et al.
Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss
,
2001
.
[14]
S. Andelman,et al.
Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks
,
2000
.
[15]
R. Lambeck,et al.
Focal Species: a Multi-species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Focal Species for Nature Conservation Lambeck
,
2022
.
[16]
N. Schumaker,et al.
USE OF POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS AND RESERVE SELECTION ALGORITHMS IN REGIONAL CONSERVATION PLANS
,
2003
.