The size of the proton

The proton is the primary building block of the visible Universe, but many of its properties—such as its charge radius and its anomalous magnetic moment—are not well understood. The root-mean-square charge radius, rp, has been determined with an accuracy of 2 per cent (at best) by electron–proton scattering experiments. The present most accurate value of rp (with an uncertainty of 1 per cent) is given by the CODATA compilation of physical constants. This value is based mainly on precision spectroscopy of atomic hydrogen and calculations of bound-state quantum electrodynamics (QED; refs 8, 9). The accuracy of rp as deduced from electron–proton scattering limits the testing of bound-state QED in atomic hydrogen as well as the determination of the Rydberg constant (currently the most accurately measured fundamental physical constant). An attractive means to improve the accuracy in the measurement of rp is provided by muonic hydrogen (a proton orbited by a negative muon); its much smaller Bohr radius compared to ordinary atomic hydrogen causes enhancement of effects related to the finite size of the proton. In particular, the Lamb shift (the energy difference between the 2S1/2 and 2P1/2 states) is affected by as much as 2 per cent. Here we use pulsed laser spectroscopy to measure a muonic Lamb shift of 49,881.88(76) GHz. On the basis of present calculations of fine and hyperfine splittings and QED terms, we find rp = 0.84184(67) fm, which differs by 5.0 standard deviations from the CODATA value of 0.8768(69) fm. Our result implies that either the Rydberg constant has to be shifted by −110 kHz/c (4.9 standard deviations), or the calculations of the QED effects in atomic hydrogen or muonic hydrogen atoms are insufficient.

[1]  U. Jentschura,et al.  Two-loop Bethe-logarithm correction in hydrogenlike atoms. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[2]  I. Maksimovic,et al.  New limits on the drift of fundamental constants from laboratory measurements. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[3]  C. Petitjean,et al.  Observation of the Molecular Quenching of μp(2S) Atoms , 2001 .

[4]  Markushin Atomic cascade in muonic hydrogen and the problem of kinetic-energy distribution in the ground state. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[5]  A. Giacomo A sensitive test of quantum electrodynamics. The 2S–2P energy difference of muonic hydrogen , 1969 .

[6]  André Clairon,et al.  Optical Frequency Measurement of the 2S-12D Transitions in Hydrogen and Deuterium: Rydberg Constant and Lamb Shift Determinations , 1999 .

[7]  Salomon,et al.  Measurement of the hydrogen 1S- 2S transition frequency by phase coherent comparison with a microwave cesium fountain clock , 2000, Physical review letters.

[8]  H. Bethe,et al.  NEGATIVE MESON ABSORPTION IN LIQUID HYDROGEN , 1962 .

[9]  Ingo Sick On the RMS radius of the proton , 2003 .

[10]  J.F.C.A. Veloso,et al.  Muonic hydrogen cascade time and lifetime of the short-lived 2S state , 2007 .

[11]  A. Clairon,et al.  Metrology of hydrogen atom: Determination of the Rydberg constant and Lamb shifts , 2001 .

[12]  E. Bigot,et al.  Status of the muonic hydrogen Lamb-shift experiment , 2007 .

[13]  Howard Grotch,et al.  Theory of light hydrogenlike atoms , 2000, hep-ph/0002158.

[14]  Savely G. Karshenboim Precision physics of simple atoms: QED tests, nuclear structure and fundamental constants , 2005 .

[15]  A. Clairon,et al.  Metrology of the hydrogen and deuterium atoms: Determination of the Rydberg constant and Lamb shifts , 2000 .

[16]  Enrico Fermi,et al.  The Decay of Negative Mesotrons in Matter , 1947 .

[17]  Gang Li,et al.  The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database , 2005 .

[18]  U. Meißner,et al.  Dispersion analysis of the nucleon form factors including meson continua , 2006, hep-ph/0608337.

[19]  V. Hughes,et al.  Precision determination of the hyperfine-structure interval in the ground state of positronium. V , 1977 .

[20]  Randolf Pohl,et al.  2S state and Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen , 2009 .

[21]  G. Gabrielse,et al.  New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[22]  L. Simons,et al.  Recent Results on Antiprotonic Atoms using a Cyclotron Trap at LEAR , 1988 .

[23]  A. P. Martynenko 2S Hyperfine splitting of muonic hydrogen , 2005 .

[24]  D. Horvath,et al.  A new method to produce a negative muon beam of keV energies , 1997 .

[25]  Willis E. Lamb,et al.  Fine Structure of the Hydrogen Atom by a Microwave Method , 1947 .

[26]  N. Levinos,et al.  A continuously tunable sequential Stokes Raman laser , 1986 .

[27]  Adolf Giesen,et al.  Scalable concept for diode-pumped high-power solid-state lasers , 1994 .

[28]  Pachucki Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[29]  Randolf Pohl,et al.  Observation of long-lived muonic hydrogen in the 2S state. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[30]  Adolf Giesen,et al.  The 2S Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen and the proton rms charge radius , 2005 .

[31]  M. Janousch,et al.  High precision measurements of the ground state hyperfine structure interval of muonium and of the muon magnetic moment , 1999 .

[32]  D. Bosnar,et al.  High-precision determination of the electric and magnetic form factors of the proton , 2010, 1108.3533.

[33]  T. Graf,et al.  Thin-Disk Yb:YAG Oscillator-Amplifier Laser, ASE, and Effective Yb:YAG Lifetime , 2009, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[34]  Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen , 2004, physics/0410051.

[35]  S. Lundeen,et al.  Separated Oscillatory Fields Measurement of the Lamb Shift in Hydrogen, N=2. , 1981 .

[36]  Theodor W. Hänsch,et al.  The muonic hydrogen Lamb-shift experiment , 2005 .

[37]  P. Dirac The quantum theory of the electron , 1928 .

[38]  P. Kusch,et al.  The Magnetic Moment of the Electron , 1948 .

[39]  A. Antognini,et al.  The Lamb Shift Experiment in Muonic Hydrogen , 2005 .

[40]  Toth,et al.  Water Vapor Measurements between 590 and 2582 cm-1: Line Positions and Strengths. , 1998, Journal of molecular spectroscopy.

[41]  B. Taylor,et al.  CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2006 | NIST , 2007, 0801.0028.

[42]  J.F.C.A. Veloso,et al.  Planar LAAPDs: temperature dependence, performance, and application in low energy X-ray spectroscopy , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[43]  L. Hilico,et al.  Coulombic and radiative decay rates of the resonances of the exotic molecular ions pp{mu}, pp{pi}, dd{mu}, dd{pi}, and dt{mu} , 2004 .