In vivo methods of nanotoxicology.

The new field of nanotoxicology is steadily emerging in parallel with rapid advances made in nanotechnology to evaluate biological impact of intended and non-intended nanomaterial exposure over time as their human applications constantly increase. Over the last decade nanotoxicology methods have mostly relied on in vitro cell-based characterizations that do not account for the complexity of in vivo systems with respect to biodistribution, metabolism, hematology, immunology, and neurological ramifications. Comprehensive in vivo studies addressing the toxicity of nanoscale materials are scarce mainly because the field is still nascent. Efforts in standardizing methodology to study the in vivo safety of these materials are currently undertaken by various government agencies and research organizations. Here, we discuss the need for in vivo nanotoxicity studies, outline some of the important methods, and comment on practical considerations in carrying out such studies.

[1]  M. Fenech Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[2]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  W Schmid,et al.  The micronucleus test. , 1975, Mutation research.

[4]  Julie W. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy , 2005, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[5]  Hamidreza Ghandehari,et al.  Size and surface charge significantly influence the toxicity of silica and dendritic nanoparticles , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[6]  H. Ghandehari,et al.  Targeting tumor angiogenesis: comparison of peptide and polymer-peptide conjugates. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Scott C. Brown,et al.  Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials. Part VI. Characterization of nanoscale particles for toxicological evaluation. , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[8]  D. Grainger,et al.  Cell-cell signaling in co-cultures of macrophages and fibroblasts. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[9]  R. Müller,et al.  'Stealth' corona-core nanoparticles surface modified by polyethylene glycol (PEG): influences of the corona (PEG chain length and surface density) and of the core composition on phagocytic uptake and plasma protein adsorption. , 2000, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[10]  Saber M Hussain,et al.  Characterization of nanomaterial dispersion in solution prior to in vitro exposure using dynamic light scattering technique. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[11]  E. Zeiger,et al.  The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. , 2000, Mutation research.

[12]  J. Kreuter,et al.  Influence of the surface properties of low contact angle surfactants on the body distribution of 14C-poly(methyl methacrylate) nanoparticles. , 1992, Journal of microencapsulation.

[13]  Wolfgang Kreyling,et al.  Toxicological hazards of inhaled nanoparticles--potential implications for drug delivery. , 2004, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[14]  B. Manthey,et al.  Distribution and elimination of coated polymethyl [2-14C]methacrylate nanoparticles after intravenous injection in rats. , 1984, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[15]  Jinatta Jittiwat,et al.  Biodistribution of gold nanoparticles and gene expression changes in the liver and spleen after intravenous administration in rats. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[16]  K. Vandermeid,et al.  Method for reducing endotoxin in Moraxella catarrhalis UspA2 protein preparations. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[17]  Craig A. Poland,et al.  Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[18]  F. Sarto,et al.  The micronucleus assay in exfoliated cells of the human buccal mucosa. , 1987, Mutagenesis.

[19]  E. Hodgson Introduction to Toxicology , 2004 .

[20]  Po-Chang Chiang,et al.  Comparison of In vitro Nanoparticles Uptake in Various Cell Lines and In vivo Pulmonary Cellular Transport in Intratracheally Dosed Rat Model , 2008, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[21]  K. Leong,et al.  The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[22]  Nihal Ahmad,et al.  Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[23]  Hamidreza Ghandehari,et al.  Geometry and surface characteristics of gold nanoparticles influence their biodistribution and uptake by macrophages. , 2011, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[24]  I. Ivanov,et al.  Comparative Study of Predictive Computational Models for Nanoparticle‐Induced Cytotoxicity , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Joel G Pounds,et al.  Particokinetics in vitro: dosimetry considerations for in vitro nanoparticle toxicity assessments. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[26]  Robert Langer,et al.  The biocompatibility of mesoporous silicates. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[27]  Michael J. Derelanko,et al.  Handbook of Toxicology , 2001 .

[28]  Ming-Hsien Tsai,et al.  Persistent Tissue Kinetics and Redistribution of Nanoparticles, Quantum Dot 705, in Mice: ICP-MS Quantitative Assessment , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[29]  U. Saffiotti,et al.  Releasing carcinogenesis test results: timing and extent of reporting. , 1977, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[30]  Alexandra Kroll,et al.  Current in vitro methods in nanoparticle risk assessment: limitations and challenges. , 2009, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[31]  V. Torchilin,et al.  Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. , 1994, Science.

[32]  R. Tice,et al.  A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[33]  D. Bazile,et al.  Stealth Me.PEG-PLA nanoparticles avoid uptake by the mononuclear phagocytes system. , 1995, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[34]  Mihail C Roco,et al.  Nanotechnology's future. , 2006, Scientific American.

[35]  Adalberto Pessoa,et al.  Methods of endotoxin removal from biological preparations: a review. , 2007, Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques.