Issues concerning Landowner Management Plan Adoption Decisions: A Recursive Bivariate Probit Approach

Despite the likely benefits of having a written forest management plan, a small number of landowners in the United States have the one. A recursive bivariate probit model was used to identify the possible relationship between landowners’ decision to obtain a management plan and their interest in future timber harvesting. Our study results based on recursive bivariate model suggest that landowners having larger land ownerships, longer forest ownership tenure, and higher education were more likely to have a forest management plan and future timber harvesting interest. While the landowners having interest for wildlife management were also interested to have a written management plan, they did not prefer to harvest in future. Study results indicate that written management plan means more than a timber harvesting strategy to landowners in general. Many elderly landowners with a low level of income and less formal education and those having small or medium sized tracts of forestland are less likely to own a written management plan. Therefore, this group requires special attention in various government sponsored forest management related extension activities. Future research on understanding landowner perception behind written management plan is recommended.

[1]  M. A. Dunn,et al.  Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowner Characteristics and Use of Forestry Services in Four Southern States: Results from a 2002–2003 Mail Survey , 2005 .

[2]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[3]  Kathryn G. Arano,et al.  Determinants of private forest management decisions: A study on West Virginia NIPF landowners , 2009 .

[4]  S. Gregory,et al.  Econometric analyses of nonindustrial forest landowners: Is there anything left to study? , 2003 .

[5]  R. Will,et al.  Comparison of Loblolly, Shortleaf, and Pitch X Loblolly Pine Plantations Growing in Oklahoma , 2015 .

[6]  D. V. Lear,et al.  Bringing Fire Back: The Changing Regimes of the Appalachian Mixed-Oak Forests , 2001, Journal of Forestry.

[7]  Sayeed R. Mehmood,et al.  Factors affecting nonindustrial private forest landowners' willingness to supply woody biomass for bioenergy , 2011 .

[8]  W. L. Mills,et al.  Program Participation Behavior of Nonindustrial Forest Landowners: A Probit Analysis , 1996, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[9]  D. Hudson,et al.  Attribute-based analysis of hunters' lease preferences. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  T. Walkingstick,et al.  Rethinking How Nonindustrial Landowners View Their Lands , 2000 .

[11]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: a review and synthesis , 2005 .

[12]  Gudbrand Lien,et al.  Analyzing determinants of forest owners’ decision-making using a sample selection framework , 2008 .

[13]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Sustainability of forest management plans: a discrete goal programming approach. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Sayeed R. Mehmood,et al.  Segmenting Southern Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners on the Basis of Their Management Objectives and Motivations for Wood-Based Bioenergy , 2011 .

[15]  D. Hodges,et al.  Factors Influencing Landowner Interest in Managing Wildlife and Avian Habitat on Private Forestland , 2009 .

[16]  C. Monfardini,et al.  Testing Exogeneity in the Bivariate Probit Model: A Monte Carlo Study , 2006 .

[17]  Yaoqi Zhang,et al.  An econometric analysis of softwood production in the U.S. South : a comparison of industrial and nonindustrial forest ownerships , 2008 .

[18]  Kathryn G. Arano,et al.  Modeling landowner participation in a proposed reforestation loan program , 2004, Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy.

[19]  Lawrence D. Teeter,et al.  Characterizing Family Forest Owners: A Cluster Analysis Approach , 2008, Forest Science.

[20]  Sayeed R. Mehmood,et al.  Predicting Nonindustrial Private Forest Landowners' Choices of a Forester for Harvesting and Tree Planting Assistance in Alabama , 2001 .

[21]  Jianbang Gan,et al.  Multivariate probit modeling of decisions on timber harvesting and request for assistance by African-American forestland owners. , 2005 .

[22]  J. Kuuluvainen,et al.  Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply , 1996 .

[23]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Afforestation Motivations of Private Landowners: An Examination of Hardwood Tree Plantings in Indiana , 2005 .

[24]  Max D. Larsen,et al.  In the mainstream: environmental attitudes of mid-south forest owners. , 1997 .

[25]  D. Grebner,et al.  Landowner knowledge and willingness to supply woody biomass for wood-based bioenergy: Sample selection approach , 2013 .

[26]  Kenneth E. Skog,et al.  An outlook for sustainable forest bioenergy production in the Lake States , 2009 .

[27]  Pete Bettinger,et al.  Forest Management and Planning , 2008 .

[28]  Sayeed R. Mehmood,et al.  Forest Parcelization in the United States: A Study of Contributing Factors , 2001, Journal of Forestry.

[29]  B. Butler,et al.  America's Family Forest Owners , 2004, Journal of Forestry.

[30]  D. Grebner,et al.  An assessment of nonindustrial private forest landowner willingness to harvest woody biomass in support of bioenergy production in Mississippi: A contingent rating approach , 2012 .

[31]  C. Manski The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[32]  Courtland L. Washburn,et al.  Relating Forestry Investment to the Characteristics of Nonindustrial Private Forestland Owners in Northern California , 1987 .

[33]  Robert P. Berrens,et al.  Investigating intended evacuation from wildfires in the wildland–urban interface: Application of a bivariate probit model , 2008 .