The Spatial Turn: Geographical Approaches in the History of Science

Over the past decade or so a number of historians of science and historical geographers, alert to the situated nature of scientific knowledge production and reception and to the migratory patterns of science on the move, have called for more explicit treatment of the geographies of past scientific knowledge. Closely linked to work in the sociology of scientific knowledge and science studies and connected with a heightened interest in spatiality evident across the humanities and social sciences this ‹spatial turn’ has informed a wide-ranging body of work on the history of science. This discussion essay revisits some of the theoretical props supporting this turn to space and provides a number of worked examples from the history of the life sciences that demonstrate the different ways in which the spaces of science have been comprehended.

[1]  Jules Verne.  Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas , 1870 .

[2]  Preface to Osiris XI , 1954, Osiris.

[3]  Lucile H. Brockway,et al.  Science and Colonial Expansion: The Role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens , 1979 .

[4]  R. Schultes.  Science and colonial expansion: The role of the British botanic gardens: by Lucille H. Brockway; published by Academic Press, London, 1979; xiv + 215 pp., price £11.80 , 1981 .

[5]  J. Sale.  The use of ‘butterflies’ , 1984, Anaesthesia.

[6]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[7]  Steven Shapin,et al.  The Place of Knowledge A Methodological Survey , 1991, Science in Context.

[8]  D. Livingstone.  Darwinism and Calvinism: The Belfast-Princeton Connection , 1992, Isis.

[9]  L. Daston,et al.  The Image of Objectivity , 1992 .

[10]  Joseph Rouse.  What Are Cultural Studies of Scientific Knowledge? , 1993 .

[11]  Svante Lindqvist.  The Spectacle of Science: An Experiment in 1744 Concerning the Aurora Borealis , 1993 .

[12]  S. Shapin.  HERE AND EVERYWHERE: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge , 1995 .

[13]  D. Livingstone,et al.  The Spaces of Knowledge: Contributions towards a Historical Geography of Science , 1995 .

[14]  Henrika Kuklick and Robert E. Kohler, eds., Science in the Field, Osiris , 1997 .

[15]  D. Bloor.  Remember the Strong Program? , 1997 .

[16]  Iwan Rhys Morus,et al.  Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science , 1998 .

[17]  ‘But Indifferently Lodged…’: Perception and Place in Building for Science in Victorian London , 1998 .

[18]  Steven J. Harris,et al.  Long-Distance Corporations, Big Sciences, and the Geography of Knowledge , 1998 .

[19]  J. Agar,et al.  Making Space For Science Territorial Themes In The Shaping Of Knowledge , 1998 .

[20]  Jan V. Golinski,et al.  Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science , 1998 .

[21]  S. Shapin.  Placing the View from Nowhere: Historical and Sociological Problems in the Location of Science , 1998 .

[22]  C. Withers.  Geography and Enlightenment , 1999 .

[23]  T. Gieryn.  Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line , 1999 .

[24]  C. Yanni.  Nature's Museums: Victorian Science and the Architecture of Display , 1999 .

[25]  Peter Galison,et al.  The architecture of science , 1999 .

[26]  T. Gieryn,et al.  A Space for Place in Sociology , 2000 .

[27]  E. Spary.  Utopia's Garden: French Natural History from Old Regime to Revolution , 2000 .

[28]  N. Rupke.  Translation studies in the history of science: the example of Vestiges , 2000, The British Journal for the History of Science.

[29]  Identities in space : contested terrains in the western city since 1850 , 2001 .

[30]  Hugh Raffles.  The Uses of Butterflies , 2001 .

[31]  J. Secord.  Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation , 2001 .

[32]  S. A. Gunn.  The Spatial Turn: Changing Histories of Space and Place , 2001 .

[33]  R. Kohler,,et al.  Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology , 2002 .

[34]  C. Withers.  The Geography of Scientific Knowledge , 2002 .

[35]  Nicolaas A. Rupke.  Göttingen and the development of the natural sciences , 2002 .

[36]  S. Alberti,et al.  ‘Equal though different’: laboratories, museums and the institutional development of biology in late-Victorian Northern England , 2003 .

[37]  D. Livingstone.  Putting science in its place , 2000, Nature.

[38]  D. Matless.  Original theories: science and the currency of the local , 2003 .

[39]  G. Mitman.  Natural history and the clinic: the regional ecology of allergy in America , 2003 .

[40]  Fish versus Power: An Environmental History of the Fraser River , 2004 .

[41]  J. Secord.  Knowledge in Transit , 2004, Isis.

[42]  N. King.  The Scale Politics of Emerging Diseases , 2004, Osiris.

[43]  S. Kirsch.  Harold Knapp and the Geography of Normal Controversy: Radioiodine in the Historical Environment , 2004, Osiris.

[44]  Matthew D. Evenden.  Locating Science, Locating Salmon: Institutions, Linkages, and Spatial Practices in Early British Columbia Fisheries Science , 2004 .

[45]  Michelle Murphy,et al.  Introduction: A Cloud over History , 2004, Osiris.

[46]  L. Schiebinger,et al.  Colonial Botany. Science, Commerce, Politics in the Early Modern World , 2006 .

[47]  From Lake Nyassa to Philadelphia: a geography of the Zambesi Expedition, 1858–64 , 2005, The British Journal for the History of Science.

[48]  S. Forgan.  Building the Museum , 2005, Isis.

[49]  T. Lewens.  Realism and the Strong Program , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[50]  Revolution of the Space Invaders: Darwin and Wallace on the Geography of Life , 2005 .

[51]  C. Yanni.  History and Sociology of Science: Interrogating the Spaces of Knowledge , 2005 .

[52]  D. Livingstone,et al.  Geography and Revolution , 2005 .

[53]  Simon Naylor,et al.  Introduction: historical geographies of science – places, contexts, cartographies , 2005, The British Journal for the History of Science.

[54]  S. Alberti,et al.  Objects and the Museum , 2005, Isis.

[55]  C. Withers.  Geography, Science and National Identity: Scotland since 1520 , 2006 .

[56]  The geography of Darwinism , 2006 .

[57]  D. Matless,et al.  Experiment in landscape: the Norfolk excavations of Marietta Pallis , 2006 .

[58]  B. Parry.  New spaces of biological commodification: the dynamics of trade in genetic resources and 'bioinformation' , 2006 .

[59]  N. Johnson.  Cultivating science and planting beauty: the spaces of display in Cambridge's botanical gardens , 2006 .

[60]  T. Gieryn.  City as Truth-Spot , 2006 .

[61]  N. Davidovitch,et al.  Medical Borders: Historical, Political, and Cultural Analyses , 2006, Science in Context.

[62]  Innes M. Keighren.  Bringing geography to the book: charting the reception of Influences of geographic environment , 2006 .

[63]  D. Bloor.  Ideals and monisms: recent criticisms of the Strong Programme in the sociology of knowledge , 2007 .

[64]  Charting marine pollution science: oceanography on Canada's Pacific coast, 1938–1970 , 2007 .

[65]  A. Kennedy.  In search of the ‘true prospect’: making and knowing the Giant's Causeway as a field site in the seventeenth century , 2007, The British Journal for the History of Science.

[66]  D. Livingstone.  Science, site and speech , 2007 .