Robust adaptive backstepping control for piezoelectric nano-manipulating systems ☆

Abstract In this paper we present a systematic modeling and control approach for nano-manipulations of a two-dimensional PZT (piezoelectric transducer) actuated servo stage. The major control challenges associated with piezoelectric nano-manipulators typically include the nonlinear dynamics of hysteresis, model uncertainties, and various disturbances. The adverse effects of these complications will result in significant performance loss, unless effectively eliminated. The primary goal of the paper is on the ultra high precision control of such systems by handling various model uncertainties and disturbances simultaneously. To this end, a novel robust adaptive backstepping-like control approach is developed such that parametric uncertainties can be estimated adaptively while the nonlinear dynamics and external disturbances are treated as bounded disturbances for robust elimination. Meanwhile, the L2-gain of the closed-loop system is considered, and an H ∞ optimization problem is formulated to improve the tracking accuracy. Numerical simulations and real time experiments are finally conducted, which significantly outperform conventional PID methods and achieve around 1% tracking error for circular contouring tasks.

[1]  Ming-Jyi Jang,et al.  Modeling and control of a piezoelectric actuator driven system with asymmetric hysteresis , 2009, J. Frankl. Inst..

[2]  Juan Li,et al.  Piezoelectric Multimode Vibration Control for Stiffened Plate Using ADRC-Based Acceleration Compensation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Adaptive Control for the Systems Preceded by Hysteresis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Chun-Yi Su,et al.  High-precision control of piezoelectric nanopositioning stages using hysteresis compensator and disturbance observer , 2014 .

[5]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  A Survey of Control Issues in Nanopositioning , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[6]  Wen-Hua Chen,et al.  Disturbance observer based control for nonlinear systems , 2004 .

[7]  Reinder Banning,et al.  Modeling piezoelectric actuators , 2000 .

[8]  Gursel Alici,et al.  Development and dynamic modelling of a flexure-based Scott-Russell mechanism for nano-manipulation , 2009 .

[9]  Lei Guo,et al.  Disturbance-Observer-Based Control and Related Methods—An Overview , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Peng Yan,et al.  A disturbance observer-based adaptive control approach for flexure beam nano manipulators. , 2016, ISA transactions.

[11]  Chun-Yi Su,et al.  Integral resonant damping for high-bandwidth control of piezoceramic stack actuators with asymmetric hysteresis nonlinearity , 2014 .

[12]  Jingqing Han,et al.  From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control , 2009, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[13]  Chun-Yi Su,et al.  Robust adaptive control of a class of nonlinear systems with unknown backlash-like hysteresis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[14]  Dong Sun,et al.  Comments on Active Disturbance Rejection Control , 2007, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[15]  Lei Guo,et al.  Anti-disturbance control theory for systems with multiple disturbances: a survey. , 2014, ISA transactions.

[16]  J. Yi,et al.  Disturbance-Observer-Based Hysteresis Compensation for Piezoelectric Actuators , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[17]  Tegoeh Tjahjowidodo,et al.  Structural response investigation of a triangular-based piezoelectric drive mechanism to hysteresis effect of the piezoelectric actuator , 2013 .

[18]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Nonlinear and adaptive control de-sign , 1995 .

[19]  Charalampos P. Bechlioulis,et al.  Robust adaptive fuzzy control of nonaffine systems guaranteeing transient and steady state error bounds , 2009, 2009 17th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[20]  Carlos García-Rodriguez,et al.  On the Control of the Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor: An Active Disturbance Rejection Control Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[21]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  Robust Performance Enhancement Using Disturbance Observers for Hysteresis Compensation Based on Generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model , 2013 .

[22]  A. Schaft L/sub 2/-gain analysis of nonlinear systems and nonlinear state-feedback H/sub infinity / control , 1992 .

[23]  Hao-Chi Chang,et al.  Sliding mode control on electro-mechanical systems , 1999 .

[24]  Li Xu,et al.  Adaptive robust precision motion control of linear motors with negligible electrical dynamics: theory and experiments , 2001 .

[25]  Wen-Yuh Jywe,et al.  Precision tracking control of a piezoelectric-actuated system , 2008 .

[26]  Tielong Shen,et al.  Robust H∞ control of uncertain nonlinear system via state feedback , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[27]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Modeling Piezoelectric Stack Actuators for Control of Mlcromanlpulatlon , 2022 .

[28]  Lei Guo,et al.  Composite anti-disturbance control for Markovian jump nonlinear systems via disturbance observer , 2013, Autom..

[29]  Ken Chen,et al.  Tracking control and active disturbance rejection with application to noncircular machining , 2007 .

[30]  Tianyou Chai,et al.  Neural-Network-Based Terminal Sliding-Mode Control of Robotic Manipulators Including Actuator Dynamics , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[31]  Kouhei Ohnishi,et al.  A Controller Design Method Based on Functionality , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.