Becoming Applied: The Transformation of Economics after 1970

This paper conjectures that economics has changed profoundly since the 1970s and that these changes involve a new understanding of the relationship between theoretical and applied work. Drawing on an analysis of John Bates Clark medal winners, it is suggested that the discipline became more applied, applied work being accorded a higher status in relation to pure theory than was previously the case. Discussing new types of applied work, the changing context of applied work, and new sites for applied work, the paper outlines a research agenda that will test the conjecture that there has been a changed understanding of the nature of applied work and hence of economics itself.

[1]  H. Spencer Banzhaf,et al.  Objective or Multi-Objective? Two Historically Competing Visions for Benefit-Cost Analysis , 2009, Land Economics.

[2]  David Edgerton.  The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications. , 2004 .

[3]  F. Hahn.  The Winter of our Discontent , 1973 .

[4]  Beatrice Cherrier,et al.  Classifying Economics: A History of the JEL Codes , 2015 .

[5]  Jennifer Alexander.  Thinking Again about Science in Technology , 2012, Isis.

[6]  Rutledge Vining.  Koopmans on the Choice of Variables to be Studies and the Methods of Measurement , 1949 .

[7]  B. Mccallum.  Recent Developments in Monetary Policy Analysis: The Roles of Theory and Evidence , 1999 .

[8]  W. Samuels.  The Journal of Economic Issues , 2003 .

[9]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project , 1986 .

[10]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics , 1983 .

[11]  Uskali Mäki.  The Methodology of Positive Economics , 2009 .

[12]  P. Mongin.  The “Full-Cost” Controversy of the 1940s and 1950s: A Methodological Assessment , 1992 .

[13]  Paul Forman,et al.  The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology , 2007 .

[14]  E. Forget.  Contested Histories of an Applied Field: The Case of Health Economics , 2004 .

[15]  S. Durlauf,et al.  Robbins on Economic Generalizations and Reality in the Light of Modern Econometrics , 2009 .

[16]  Bruce J. Caldwell,et al.  How Economics Became a Mathematical Science , 2020 .

[17]  A. Salanti,et al.  Macroeconomics and the real world , 2000 .

[18]  Frederic S. Lee.  The Marginalist Controversy and the Demise of Full Cost Pricing , 1984 .

[19]  M. Friedman,et al.  The Methodology of Positive Economics , 2010 .

[20]  Michael R. Williams,et al.  History of computation , 1986 .

[21]  David F. Hendry,et al.  Econometrics-Alchemy or Science? , 1980 .

[22]  Charles G. Renfro.  Econometrics and the Computer: Love or a Marriage of Convenience? , 2011 .

[23]  A. Dreher.  The Political Economy of the World Bank: The Early Years , 2009 .

[24]  Alan Manning,et al.  The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con Out of Econometrics , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Roger E. Backhouse,et al.  The Concept of Applied Economics: A History of Ambiguity and Multiple Meanings , 2000 .

[26]  Charles G. Renfro.  A compendium of existing econometric software packages , 2004 .

[27]  R. Backhouse.  The Puzzle of Modern Economics , 2010 .

[28]  G. Favero.  The cost of living in America: a political history of economic statistics , 2010 .

[29]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con Out of Econometrics , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  M. Solovey.  Shaky Foundations: The Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus in Cold War America , 2013 .

[31]  T. Barna,et al.  Measuring Business Cycles. , 1946 .

[32]  David Card,et al.  Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. , 1995 .

[33]  U. Mäki.  The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections On The Milton Friedman Legacy , 2009 .

[34]  M. S. Morgan,et al.  From interwar pluralism to post-war neoclassicism , 1998 .

[35]  M. Rutherford.  The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947 , 2013 .

[36]  P. Lucier.  The Origins of Pure and Applied Science in Gilded Age America , 2012, Isis.

[37]  Economists in International Agencies: An Exploratory Study , 1986 .

[38]  Wang Yan-ming.  The definition of Economics , 2005 .

[39]  Jean-Baptiste Fleury,et al.  The evolving notion of relevance: an historical perspective to the ‘economics made fun’ movement , 2010 .

[40]  Tjalling C. Koopmans,et al.  Measurement Without Theory , 1947 .

[41]  W. Leontief.  Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts , 1971 .