Using resistivity or logarithm of resistivity to calculate depth of investigation index to assess reliability of electrical resistivity tomography

ABSTRACTWe have conducted a comparative study to determine the most efficient and reliable way to calculate the depth of investigation (DOI) index to assess the quality of electrical resistivity tomography models. We compared the results of using resistivity and logarithm of resistivity after testing them on four synthetic models by direct modeling and a field case, in which the resistivity model was validated by auger drillings. We tested the two most commonly used acquisition arrays, dipole-dipole, and Wenner-Schlumberger. The index calculated with the logarithm of resistivity clearly appears to be more satisfactory than the resistivity-based index. The method based on resistivity systematically overestimates risk (high DOI) in areas of high resistivity, and it underestimates risk in conductive zones. As a result, we strongly recommend the use of the logarithm of inverted resistivity to calculate the DOI index.

[1]  Guo Qian,et al.  Detecting and monitoring of water inrush in tunnels and coal mines using direct current resistivity method: A review , 2015 .

[2]  C. Hauck,et al.  Applicability of electrical resistivity tomography monitoring to coarse blocky and ice‐rich permafrost landforms , 2009 .

[3]  Partha S. Routh,et al.  Model reliability for 3D electrical resistivity tomography: Application of the volume of investigation index to a time-lapse monitoring experiment , 2007 .

[4]  Frederick D. Day-Lewis,et al.  Inversion of multi-frequency electromagnetic induction data for 3D characterization of hydraulic conductivity , 2011 .

[5]  M. Provansal,et al.  Evolution of the Rhône delta plain in the Holocene , 2005 .

[6]  T. Robert,et al.  Geophysical identification, characterization, and monitoring of preferential groundwater flow paths in fractured media , 2012 .

[7]  R. Barker.  Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays , 1989 .

[8]  Frédéric Nguyen,et al.  A shallow geothermal experiment in a sandy aquifer monitored using electric resistivity tomography , 2012 .

[9]  A. Roy,et al.  Depth of investigation in wenner, three-electrode and dipole-dipole DC resistivity methods , 1972 .

[10]  S. A. Hagrey.  Geophysical imaging of root-zone, trunk, and moisture heterogeneity , 2007 .

[11]  K. Schäfer,et al.  Evidence for spatial variability in hydraulic redistribution within an oak–pine forest from resistivity imaging , 2012 .

[12]  F. Martínez-Moreno,et al.  Combined microgravity, electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization to detect deeply buried caves: Algaidilla cave (Southern Spain) , 2013 .

[13]  P. Strat,et al.  High resolution stratigraphy and evolution of the Rhône delta plain during Postglacial time, from subsurface drilling data bank , 2005 .

[14]  D. Caterina,et al.  A comparison study of different image appraisal tools for electrical resistivity tomography , 2013 .

[15]  R. Barker,et al.  Rapid least-squared inversion of apparent resisitivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method , 1996 .

[16]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays , 2004 .

[17]  C. Lambiel,et al.  Assessing reliability of 2D resistivity imaging in mountain permafrost studies using the depth of investigation index method , 2003 .

[18]  P. Turberg,et al.  Geoelectric mapping of near-surface karstic fractures by using null arrays , 2002 .

[19]  C. Emblanch,et al.  Combining Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Ground Penetrating Radar to study geological structuring of karst Unsaturated Zone , 2013 .

[20]  V. Vallès,et al.  An integrative geological and geophysical approach to characterize a superficial deltaic aquifer in the Camargue plain, France , 2013 .

[21]  Rosemary Knight,et al.  Hysteresis in the electrical resistivity of partially saturated sandstones , 1991 .

[22]  A. Christiansen,et al.  A global measure for depth of investigation , 2012 .

[23]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A comparison of the Gauss-Newton and quasi-Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion , 2002 .

[24]  H. Maurer,et al.  Investigating groundwater flow paths within proglacial moraine using multiple geophysical methods , 2011 .

[25]  O. Kaufmann,et al.  A modified DOI-based method to statistically estimate the depth of investigation of dc resistivity surveys , 2014 .

[26]  A. Apparao,et al.  Depth Of Investigation In Direct Current Methods , 1971 .

[27]  Robert B Jackson,et al.  Geophysical subsurface imaging for ecological applications. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[28]  T. Dahlin.  The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques , 2001 .

[29]  L. S. Edwards,et al.  A modified pseudosection for resistivity and IP , 1977 .

[30]  James P. McNamara,et al.  Application of time-lapse ERT imaging to watershed characterization , 2008 .

[31]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys , 1999 .