The dynamics of sperm cooperation in a competitive environment

Sperm cooperation has evolved in a variety of taxa and is often considered a response to sperm competition, yet the benefit of this form of collective movement remains unclear. Here we use fine-scale imaging and a minimal mathematical model to study sperm aggregation in the rodent genus Peromyscus. We demonstrate that as the number of sperm cells in an aggregate increase, the group moves with more persistent linearity but without increasing speed; this benefit, however, is offset in larger aggregates as the geometry of the group forces sperm to swim against one another. The result is a non-monotonic relationship between aggregate size and average velocity with both a theoretically predicted and empirically observed optimum of 6-7 sperm/aggregate. To understand the role of sexual selection in driving these sperm group dynamics, we compared two sister-species with divergent mating systems and find that sperm of P. maniculatus (highly promiscuous), which have evolved under intense competition, form optimal-sized aggregates more often than sperm of P. polionotus (strictly monogamous), which lack competition. Our combined mathematical and experimental study of coordinated sperm movement reveals the importance of geometry, motion and group size on sperm velocity and suggests how these physical variables interact with evolutionary selective pressures to regulate cooperation in competitive environments.

[1]  H. Berg Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[2]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  Swarming, swirling and stasis in sequestered bristle-bots , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Gerhard Gompper,et al.  Wall accumulation of self-propelled spheres , 2013 .

[4]  S. Pitnick,et al.  Evolution of intra‐ejaculate sperm interactions: do sperm cooperate? , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[5]  E. Gaffney,et al.  Mammalian Sperm Motility: Observation and Theory , 2011 .

[6]  E. Gaffney,et al.  Nonlinear instability in flagellar dynamics: a novel modulation mechanism in sperm migration? , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  G. Gompper,et al.  Hydrodynamics of sperm cells near surfaces. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[8]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Competition drives cooperation among closely-related sperm of deer mice , 2009, Nature.

[9]  L. Simmons,et al.  Sperm competition and the evolution of the sperm hook in house mice , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[10]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Female promiscuity promotes the evolution of faster sperm in cichlid fishes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  G. Gompper,et al.  Cooperation of sperm in two dimensions: synchronization, attraction, and aggregation through hydrodynamic interactions. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  K. Foster,et al.  Sperm Sociality: Cooperation, Altruism, and Spite , 2008, PLoS biology.

[13]  Linda Z. Shi,et al.  The use of optical tweezers to study sperm competition and motility in primates , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  S. Immler Sperm competition and sperm cooperation: the potential role of diploid and haploid expression. , 2008, Reproduction.

[15]  R. Ingermann,et al.  Development of a novel CASA system based on open source software for characterization of zebrafish sperm motility parameters. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[16]  T. Birkhead,et al.  By Hook or by Crook? Morphometry, Competition and Cooperation in Rodent Sperm , 2007, PloS one.

[17]  Joseph J. Hale,et al.  From Disorder to Order in Marching Locusts , 2006, Science.

[18]  T. Lubensky,et al.  Brownian Motion of an Ellipsoid , 2006, Science.

[19]  W. Breed Evolution of the spermatozoon in muroid rodents , 2005, Journal of morphology.

[20]  M. Gomendio,et al.  Male Fertility in Natural Populations of Red Deer Is Determined by Sperm Velocity and the Proportion of Normal Spermatozoa1 , 2005, Biology of reproduction.

[21]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Sperm swimming speed and energetics vary with sperm competition risk in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  G. Parker,et al.  Spermatozoal Traits and Sperm Competition in Atlantic Salmon Relative Sperm Velocity Is the Primary Determinant of Fertilization Success , 2004, Current Biology.

[23]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  H. Moore,et al.  Exceptional sperm cooperation in the wood mouse , 2002, Nature.

[25]  T. Burke,et al.  Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  L. M. King,et al.  Turkey sperm mobility influences paternity in the context of competitive fertilization. , 1999, Biology of reproduction.

[27]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[28]  G. Parker,et al.  Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Vicsek,et al.  Formation of complex bacterial colonies via self-generated vortices. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[30]  A. Mccarthy Development , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[32]  W. Holt,et al.  The value of sperm swimming speed measurements in assessing the fertility of human frozen semen. , 1989, Human reproduction.

[33]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[34]  D. Foltz Genetic Evidence for Long-Term Monogamy in a Small Rodent, Peromyscus polionotus , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[35]  R. Baker,et al.  CHROMOSOMAL EVOLUTION AND THE MODE OF SPECIATION IN THREE SPECIES OF PEROMYSCUS , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  D. Nash,et al.  OCCURRENCE OF SUCCESSFUL MULTIPLE INSEMINATION OF FEMALES IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DEER MICE (PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS) , 1973, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[38]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[39]  Craig W. Reynolds,et al.  A Distributed Behavioral Model , 1987 .

[40]  D. Dewsbury,et al.  Aggression, Copulation, and Differential Reproduction of Deer Mice (Peromyscus Maniculatus) in a Semi-Natural Enclosure , 1984 .

[41]  J. Layne,et al.  Comparative morphology of spermatozoa of the rodent genus Peromyscus (Muridae). American Museum novitates ; no. 2532 , 1974 .

[42]  W K Whitten,et al.  The culture of mouse embryos in vitro. , 1971 .

[43]  D. C. Joseph Methods in mammalian embryology , 1971 .