Scholarship and disciplinary practices

[1]  J Virgo.  The University of Chicago Graduate Library School. , 1980, Hospital libraries.

[2]  C. Palmer.  Thematic Research Collections , 2007 .

[3]  P. Sandstrom.  An Optimal Foraging Approach to Information Seeking and Use , 1994, The Library Quarterly.

[4]  Robert S. Taylor,et al.  Information use environments. , 1991 .

[5]  Jeffrey C. Stier,et al.  The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: a forestry case study , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Noriko Hara,et al.  An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Alesia Zuccalá,et al.  Modeling the invisible college , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Lisa Covi,et al.  Material Mastery: Situating Digital Library Use in University Research Practices , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  Ken Eason,et al.  Patterns of use of electronic journals , 2000, J. Documentation.

[10]  George Buchanan,et al.  Information Seeking by Humanities Scholars , 2005, ECDL.

[11]  B. Cronin.  Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures , 2003 .

[12]  D. Michels.  The use of people as information sources in biblical studies research , 2005 .

[13]  W. Wulf,et al.  Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2008 .

[14]  Stephen Cole,et al.  The Hierarchy of the Sciences? , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of scientific and technological information. , 1966 .

[16]  Catherine A. Johnson,et al.  Accidentally Found on Purpose: Information-Seeking Behavior of Historians in Archives , 2002, The Library Quarterly.

[17]  Pertti Vakkari.  Task complexity, information types, search strategies and relevance: integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval , 1999 .

[18]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Domain analysis in information science Eleven approaches traditional as well as innovative , 2002 .

[20]  James Hartley,et al.  Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Julie Hallmark.  Information-Seeking Behavior of Academic Meteorologists and the Role of Information Specialists , 2001 .

[22]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visualizing knowledge domains , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  David Ellis,et al.  The English literature researcher in the age of the Internet , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Mary Ellen Soper.  Characteristics and Use of Personal Collections , 1976, The Library Quarterly.

[25]  Olof Sundin,et al.  Towards an Understanding of Symbolic Aspects of Professional Information : an Analysis of the Nursing Knowledge Domain , 2003 .

[26]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Learning About the Information Seeking of Interdisciplinary Scholars and Students , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[28]  Hee-Cheol Kim,et al.  Reviewing Practices in Collaborative Writing , 2001, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[29]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Invisible Colleges and Information Transfer a Review and Commentary with particular Reference to the Social Sciences , 1982, J. Documentation.

[30]  J. Unsworth.  Our Cultural Commonwealth: The report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences , 2006 .

[31]  Joseph T Rouse,et al.  Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically , 1996 .

[32]  B. Dervin,et al.  Information needs and uses. , 1986 .

[33]  Plergiorgio Strata,et al.  Citation analysis , 1995, Nature.

[34]  P. Wouters,et al.  What is the matter with e-science: thinking aloud about informatisation in knowledge creation , 2006 .

[35]  Belver C. Griffith,et al.  Informal channels of communication in the behavioral sciences: Their relevance in the structuring of formal or bibliographic communication , 1968 .

[36]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[37]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Work at the Boundaries of Science: Information and the Interdisciplinary Research Process , 2001 .

[38]  Carole L. Palmer.  Aligning studies of information seeking and use with domain analysis , 1999 .

[39]  Marlene Manoff,et al.  Cyberhope or Cyberhype?: Computers and Scholarly Research , 1997 .

[40]  D. Case,et al.  The Collection and Use of Information by Some American Historians: A Study of Motives and Methods , 1991, The Library Quarterly.

[41]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[42]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. , 2002 .

[43]  Stephanie W. Haas,et al.  Information-seeking behavior and use of social science faculty studying stateless nations: a case study , 2001 .

[44]  C. Hine.  The Virtual Objects of Ethnography , 2000 .

[45]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The Hand of Science: Academic Writing and Its Rewards , 2005 .

[46]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Indexing and Access for Digital Libraries and the Internet: Human, Database, and Domain Factors , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[48]  Ann S. Zimmerman,et al.  DATA SHARING AND SECONDARY USE OF SCIENTIFIC DATA: EXPERIENCES OF ECOLOGISTS , 2003 .

[49]  David Ellis,et al.  A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design , 1989, J. Documentation.

[50]  S. Pierce.  Boundary Crossing in Research Literatures as a Means of Interdisciplinary Information Transfer , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[51]  Documentation , 2006 .

[52]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[53]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Information Work at the Boundaries of Science: Linking Library Services to Research Practices , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[54]  Catherine C. Marshall.  The Future of Annotation in a Digital (Paper) World , 1998 .

[55]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Weak Information Work and "Doable" Problems in Interdisciplinary Science , 2007, ASIST.

[56]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Structures and Strategies of Interdisciplinary Science , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[57]  C.C. Marshall,et al.  Exploring the relationship between personal and public annotations , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Joint ACM/IEEE Conference on Digital Libraries, 2004..

[58]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[59]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  THE DESIGN OF DATABASES AND OTHER INFORMATION RESOURCES FOR HUMANITIES SCHOLARS: THE GETTY ONLINE SEARCHING PROJECT REPORT NO. 4 , 1994 .

[60]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[61]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  Field differences in the use and perceived usefulness of scholarly mailing lists , 2004, Inf. Res..

[62]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[63]  Laura J. Neumann,et al.  The Information Work of Interdisciplinary Humanities Scholars: Exploration and Translation , 2002, The Library Quarterly.

[64]  Charles Bazerman,et al.  Persuasion at a Distance. (Book Reviews: Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science.) , 1990 .

[65]  Bill N. Schilit,et al.  Beyond paper: supporting active reading with free form digital ink annotations , 1998, CHI.

[66]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Science and technology studies and information studies , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[67]  L. Hargens.  Using the Literature: Reference networks, reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[68]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Afterword: Ontological, Epistemological and Sociological Dimensions of Domains , 2003 .

[69]  Julie Hallmark.  Access and Retrieval of Recent Journal Articles: A Comparative Study of Chemists and Geoscientists , 2004, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

[70]  Paul K. Hoch,et al.  Institutional versus intellectual migrations in the nucleation of new scientific specialties , 1987 .

[71]  D. Fallis.  Introduction: Social Epistemology and Information Science , 2002 .

[72]  Hans-Christoph Hobohm,et al.  SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION & DOCUMENTATION - TIME FOR A STATE OF THE ART? * , 1999 .

[73]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[74]  Rob Kling,et al.  a Bit More to It: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-technical Interaction Networks , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[75]  S. Epton,et al.  Interdisciplinary Analysis and Research: Theory and practice of problem focused Research and Development , 1989 .

[76]  Melissa H. Cragin,et al.  Scientific Data Collections and Distributed Collective Practice , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[77]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  The use and users of scholarly e-journals: a review of log analysis studies , 2005, Aslib Proc..

[78]  Jr. Stephen E. Wiberley,et al.  Habits of humanists: scholarly behavior and new information technologies , 1991 .

[79]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  The Articulation of Work Through Interaction , 1993 .

[80]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities , 1996 .

[81]  D. Spanner,et al.  Border Crossings: Understanding the Cultural and Informational Dilemmas of Interdisciplinary Scholars , 2001 .

[82]  Marilyn Domas White,et al.  The Communications Behavior of Academic Economists in Research Phases , 1975, The Library Quarterly.

[83]  Donald Owen Case,et al.  Collection and organization of written information by social scientists and humanists: a review and exploratory study , 1986, J. Inf. Sci..

[84]  J. Shera.  Foundations of a Theory of Bibliography , 1952, The Library Quarterly.

[85]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Document Familiarity, Relevance, and Bradford's Law: the Getty Online Searching Project Report Number 5 , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[86]  Jenny Fry,et al.  The Cultural Shaping of ICTs within Academic Fields: Corpus-based Linguistics as a Case Study , 2004, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[87]  David Ellis,et al.  A Comparison of the Information seeking Patterns of researchers in the Physical and Social Sciences , 1993, J. Documentation.

[88]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists , 1987 .

[89]  W. D. Garvey,et al.  SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION EXCHANGE IN PSYCHOLOGY. , 1964, Science.

[90]  S. Shapin.  Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[91]  'Discourses of circumstance': A note on the author in science , 2003 .

[92]  J. Budd.  An Epistemological Foundation for Library and Information Science , 1995, The Library Quarterly.

[93]  Geoffrey C. Bowker.  Biodiversity Datadiversity , 2000 .

[94]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[95]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[96]  Deirdre C. Stam,et al.  How Art Historians Look for Information , 1984, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America.

[97]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: sharing environmental planning data sets , 1998, CSCW '98.

[98]  Stephen E. Wiberley,et al.  Humanists Revisited: A Longitudinal Look at the Adoption of Information Technology , 1994 .

[99]  S. Fuchs,et al.  The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge , 1992 .

[100]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation , 1998, HYPERTEXT '98.

[101]  Maurice B. Line,et al.  The INFORMATION USES AND NEEDS OF SOCIAL SCIENTISTS: AN OVERVIEW OF INFROSS , 1971 .

[102]  M. Merz.  Embedding Digital Infrastructure in Epistemic Culture , 2006 .

[103]  S. Traweek,et al.  Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists , 1988 .

[104]  Cecelia M. Brown.  Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists in the Electronic Information Age: Astronomers, Chemists, Mathematicians, and Physicists , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[105]  Jenny Fry,et al.  The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[106]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Rich and lean representations of information for knowledge work: the role of computing packages in the work of classical scholars , 1994, TOIS.

[107]  Claudia A. Perry,et al.  Network influences on scholarly communication in developmental dyslexia: A longitudinal follow-up , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[108]  Jenny Fry.  Studying the Scholarly web: How disciplinary culture shapes online representations , 2006 .

[109]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes , 2005, Aslib Proc..

[110]  Maurice B. Line,et al.  The structure of social science literature as shown by a large-scale citation analysis , 1981 .

[111]  Arie Rip,et al.  The Computer Revolution in Science: Steps Towards the Realization of Computer-Supported Discovery Environments , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[112]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[113]  Joseph T. Tennis.  Two Axes of Domains for Domain Analysis , 2003 .

[114]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Specialties and disciplines in science and social science: An examination of their structure using citation indexes , 1979, Scientometrics.

[115]  P. Agre.  Institutional Circuitry: Thinking about the Forms and Uses of Information , 1995 .

[116]  J. Sturchio.  "Introduction To Science and Technology Studies" , 1985 .

[117]  Helen R. Tibbo.  Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts from the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval , 1992 .

[118]  Rebecca Watson-Boone.  The Information Needs and Habits of Humanities Scholars. , 1994 .

[119]  H. Albrechtsen,et al.  Toward a New Horizon in Information Science: Domain-Analysis , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[120]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  Use studies of electronic networks: a review of empirical research approaches and challenges for their development , 1998, J. Documentation.

[121]  Joan H. Fujimura,et al.  Constructing `Do-able' Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment , 1987 .

[122]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines , 2003, J. Documentation.

[123]  John P. Walsh,et al.  The Virtual College: Computer-Mediated Communication and Scientific Work , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[124]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The Scholar's Courtesy: The Role Of Acknowledgement In The Primary Communication Process , 1995 .

[125]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  A profile of end‐user searching behavior by humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 2 , 1993 .

[126]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Document Structure and Digital Libraries: How Researchers Mobilize Information in Journal Articles , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[127]  Susheela A. Varghese,et al.  Book-Length Scholarly Essays as a Hybrid Genre in Science , 2004 .

[128]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[129]  Barry Wellman,et al.  For a social network analysis of computer networks: a sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community , 1996, SIGCPR '96.

[130]  A. Strauss.  THE ARTICULATION OF PROJECT WORK: AN ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS , 1988 .

[131]  Christine D. Brown.  Straddling the humanities and social sciences: The research process of music scholars , 2002 .

[132]  Olof Sundin.  Deflating information: From science studies to documentation , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[133]  Lynn Westbrook,et al.  Information Needs and Experiences of Scholars in Women’s Studies: Problems and Solutions , 2003 .

[134]  Colin Steele,et al.  Research practices and scholarly communication in the digital environment , 2004, Learn. Publ..

[135]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[136]  Cecelia M. Brown.  The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[137]  Lisa Covi.  Debunking the myth of the Nintendo generation: How doctoral students introduce new electronic communication practices into university , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[138]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  The importance of SDI for current awareness in fields with severe scatter of information , 1979, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[139]  Sue Stone,et al.  Humanities scholars: Information Needs and Uses , 1982, J. Documentation.

[140]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[141]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Using and Reading Scholarly Literature. , 1999 .

[142]  William B. Keller.  OBJECT, IMAGE, INQUIRY: THE ART HISTORIAN AT WORK. Elizabeth Bakewell , 1989 .

[143]  Robert S. Taylor,et al.  Problem dimensions and information traits , 1984, Inf. Soc..

[144]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[145]  Judith Palmer,et al.  Scientists and Information: I. Using Cluster Analysis to identify Information Style , 1991, J. Documentation.

[146]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[147]  Knut Tore Abrahamsen.  Indexing of musical genres. An epistemological perspective , 2003 .

[148]  Peiling Wang,et al.  A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. document selection , 1998 .

[149]  Rebecca Green,et al.  Locating Sources in Humanities Scholarship: The Efficacy of following Bibliographic References , 2000, The Library Quarterly.

[150]  Christina Courtright,et al.  Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[151]  Howard D. White,et al.  Literature Retrieval for Interdisciplinary Syntheses , 1996, Libr. Trends.

[152]  Erin E Leahey,et al.  Diversity in Everyday Research Practice , 2003 .

[153]  Julie M. Hurd,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences: Implications for Library Organization , 1992 .

[154]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Computer Networks and Scientific Work , 1996 .

[155]  Helen R. Tibbo.  Indexing for the Humanities , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[156]  Greg Myers,et al.  Writing biology : texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1990 .

[157]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Citation patterns in the history of technology , 1987 .

[158]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[159]  B. Hall.  Knowledge as a commodity and participatory research , 1979 .

[160]  Tony Becher.  The Counter-Culture of Specialization. , 1990 .

[161]  D. Ellis.  Modeling the Information-Seeking Patterns of Academic Researchers: A Grounded Theory Approach , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[162]  Anders Ørom,et al.  Knowledge Organization in the Domain of Art Studies - History, Transition and Conceptional Changes , 2003 .

[163]  Allen Foster,et al.  A nonlinear model of information-seeking behavior , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[164]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Scholarly work and the shaping of digital access , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[165]  J. Hartel,et al.  The Serious Leisure Frontier in Library and Informtion Science: Hobby Domains , 2003 .

[166]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Weak information work in scientific discovery , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[167]  C. Chu.  Literary Critics at Work and their Information Needs: A Research-Phases Model. , 1999 .

[168]  Stephen E. Wiberley,et al.  Time and Technology: A Decade-Long Look at Humanists' Use of Electronic Information Technology , 2000 .

[169]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Visualizing a Knowledge Domain's Intellectual Structure , 2001, Computer.

[170]  J. Klein,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. , 1991 .

[171]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The Getty End-User Online Searching Project in the Humanities: Report No. 6: Overview and Conclusions , 1996 .

[172]  E. W. Hulme.  Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization , 1923 .

[173]  Christine Hine,et al.  Databases as Scientific Instruments and Their Role in the Ordering of Scientific Work , 2006 .

[174]  Diana Crane,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medical History.

[175]  J. Furner.  Shera's social epistemology recast as psychological bibliology , 2002 .

[176]  S. Woolgar,et al.  Virtual Witnessing in a Virtual Age: A Prospectus for Social Studies of E-Science , 2006 .

[177]  Rob Kling,et al.  Electronic Journals and Legitimate Media in the Systems of Scholarly Communication [1995, rptd. 2008] , 1996 .

[178]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  The Culture of Scientists and Disciplinary Rhetoric , 1990 .

[179]  Jenny Fry,et al.  The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields , 2004, ASIST.

[180]  Tonyia J. Tidline,et al.  Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment , 2001 .

[181]  L.J.B. Mote,et al.  REASONS FOR THE VARIATIONS IN THE INFORMATION NEEDS OF SCIENTISTS , 1962 .

[182]  Michael Nentwich.  Cyberinfrastructure for Next Generation Scholarly Publishing , 2006 .

[183]  Susan Siegfried,et al.  An Analysis of Search Terminology Used by Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report Number 1 , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[184]  C. O. Frost.  The Use of Citations in Literary Research: A Preliminary Classification of Citation Functions , 1979, The Library Quarterly.

[185]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Simplification in Scientific Work: An Example from Neuroscience Research , 1983 .

[186]  Deborah N. Wilde,et al.  Research practices of humanities scholars in an online environment: The Getty online searching project report no. 3 , 1995 .

[187]  M. White,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Citing Behavior: Contributions, Criteria, and Metalevel Documentation Concerns , 1997, The Library Quarterly.

[188]  Linda Brodkey,et al.  Academic Writing As Social Practice , 1987 .

[189]  N. Mullins,et al.  The Group Structure of Cocitation Clusters: A Comparative Study , 1977 .

[190]  David W. Weisgerber.  Interdisciplinary Searching: Problems and Suggested remedies a Report from the ICSTI Group on Interdisciplinary Searching , 1993, J. Documentation.

[191]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[192]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[193]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2002, J. Documentation.

[194]  C. Geertz.  Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology , 1983 .

[195]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering , 2003, GROUP.

[196]  Howard D. White,et al.  Authors as citers over time , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[197]  A. Young.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[198]  M. Mulkay.  Conceptual Displacement and Migration in Science: A Prefatory Paper , 1974 .

[199]  Orville Vernon Burton,et al.  Computing in the social sciences and humanities , 2002 .

[200]  Pamela Pavliscak,et al.  Information Technology in Humanities Scholarship: Achievements, Prospects, and Challenges. The United States Focus. ACLS Occasional Paper No. 37. , 1997 .

[201]  Barbara Skelton,et al.  Scientists and Social Scientists as Information Users: a comparison of results of science user studies with the investigation into information requirements of the social sciences , 1973 .

[202]  Vinton Gray Cerf.  National Collaboratories: Applying Information Technologies for Scientific Research , 1993 .

[203]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Does citation reflect social structure?: Longitudinal evidence from the Globenet interdisciplinary research group , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[204]  S. Wiberley,et al.  Patterns of Information Seeking in the Humanities , 1989 .

[205]  Maurice B. Line,et al.  Social Science Information - The Poor Relation , 2000 .

[206]  Anne Beaulieu.  From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain , 2004 .

[207]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Designing to support situation awareness across distances: an example from a scientific collaboratory , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[208]  D. Chubin.  State of the Field The Conceptualization of Scientific Specialties , 1976 .

[209]  Franz Barjak,et al.  The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[210]  D. Edge.  Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review , 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.

[211]  Sriyani Ileperuma.  Information gathering behaviour of arts scholars in Sri Lankan universities: a critical evaluation , 2002 .

[212]  CHRISTINE L. BORGMAN,et al.  Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication , 2000, J. Documentation.

[213]  M. Bates.  The invisible substrate of information science , 1999 .

[214]  Juan Pablo Zabala.  Epistemic Cultures. How sciences make knowledge, Karin Knorr Cetina, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1999, 329 páginas , 2000 .

[215]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies , 2003 .

[216]  A. Pickering.  Science as practice and culture , 1992 .

[217]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .

[218]  Karin Knorr Cetina.  The manufacture of knowledge , 1981 .

[219]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science , 2002, Scientometrics.

[220]  Belver C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Literature. Stockholm Papers in Library and Information Science. , 1983 .

[221]  P. J. Hills.  The scholarly communication process , 1983 .

[222]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..