Competence and usage of Web 2.0 technologies by higher education faculty

Literature on Web 2.0 experiences of higher education faculty in developing countries such as Pakistan is very limited. An insight on awareness and practices of higher education faculty with these tools can be helpful to map strategies and plan of action for adopting latest technologies to support teaching–learning processes in higher education of such countries. This survey study was aimed to examine the competence and practices of higher education faculty in Pakistan with Web 2.0 technologies such as blogs, Wikis, Google Docs, Skype, Flickr, YouTube, and social networks. The study was also focused to look for what type of role faculty play while using these tools; and to find whether any significant differences in terms of age, gender, or academic discipline exist in competence and usage of these tools by the faculty. The data were collected from a sample of 246 university teachers in the spring 2014 semester. The findings of the study indicated that faculty participants reported to use Web 2.0 social tools more frequently than instrumental tools. Similarly, their competence with social tools was higher than their competence with instrumental tools. Additional results indicated that their competence with Web2.0 tools significantly differed with respect to their age, gender, and academic disciplines.

[1]  Judit García-Martín,et al.  Patterns of Web 2.0 tool use among young Spanish people , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Antonio-Ramón Bartolomé Pina.  Web 2.0 and New Learning Paradigms , 2008 .

[3]  Christal C. Pritchett,et al.  Educators’ Perceived Importance of Web 2.0 Technology Applications , 2013 .

[4]  Betty Collis,et al.  Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives , 2008 .

[5]  Zehra Ozdilek,et al.  Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about web 2.0 technologies , 2010 .

[6]  M. Prensky.  Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[7]  Ghada Alaa,et al.  Classifying Web 2.0 Supported Applications By Pattern Of Usage: Functional & Technical ISSUES , 2009, MCIS.

[8]  T. Franklin,et al.  In-Service Teachers' Self-Efficacy, Professional Development, and Web 2.0 Tools for Integration. , 2011 .

[9]  Ugur Kale,et al.  Pre-service teachers’ and teacher-educators’ experiences and attitudes toward using social networking sites for collaborative learning , 2014 .

[10]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[11]  Emmanuel E. Baro,et al.  Awareness and use of Web 2.0 tools by librarians in university libraries in Nigeria , 2013, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[12]  Maia S. Howse.  International Society for Technology in Education. , 1993 .

[13]  Fatime Balkan Kiyici.  Examining Web 2.0 Tools Usage of Science Teacher Candidates , 2012 .

[14]  R. Hartshorne,et al.  Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[15]  Daniel Lewis,et al.  What is web 2.0? , 2006, CROS.

[16]  Lynne Schrum,et al.  Web 2.0: New Tools, New Schools , 2007 .

[17]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[18]  J. Seaman,et al.  Teaching, Learning, and Sharing: How Today's Higher Education Faculty Use Social Media. , 2011 .

[19]  Lynne Schrum,et al.  Web 2.0: How-To for Educators , 2010 .

[20]  Debbie Goh,et al.  Teaching style, ICT experience and teachers’ attitudes toward teaching with Web 2.0 , 2012, Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education.

[21]  M. Green,et al.  Digital natives , 2012, BDJ.

[22]  Brenda Chawner.  Spectators, not players: information managers' use of Web 2.0 in New Zealand , 2008, Electron. Libr..

[23]  Erman Yükseltürk,et al.  Gender and Web 2.0 technology awareness among ICT teachers , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[24]  Richard Hartshorne,et al.  Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..