Contexts Matter

This study examines public school characteristics, and public and private school market characteristics, associated with participation among elementary-aged students in a means-tested school voucher program in Florida. Participants are more likely than eligible nonparticipants to come from disadvantaged public schools on multiple dimensions. On average, participants’ public schools have lower aggregate student achievement, and higher rates of disciplinary incidents. Participants’ schools receive less positive ratings on various measures from principals and teachers. Participants face more competitive private school markets, and less competitive public school markets, than do nonparticipants. When these factors are considered together, the mean achievement and disciplinary incident rate of students’ own public schools, as well as public and private school market variables, independently predict voucher use.

[1]  Marcus A. Winters,et al.  Public School Response to Special Education Vouchers , 2011 .

[2]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Competitive Effects of Means-Tested School Vouchers , 2010 .

[3]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Who uses a means-tested scholarship, and what do they choose? , 2010 .

[4]  G. Forster,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program. School Choice Issues in the State. , 2009 .

[5]  Kevin G. Welner.  NeoVouchers : the emergence of tuition tax credits for private schooling , 2008 .

[6]  David R. Garcia.  Academic and Racial Segregation in Charter Schools , 2008 .

[7]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Feeling the Florida Heat? How Low-Performing Schools Respond to Voucher and Accountability Pressure , 2007 .

[8]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina's charter school program , 2007 .

[9]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Feeling the Florida Heat? How Low-Performing Schools Respond to Voucher and Accountability Pressure. Working Paper 13. , 2007 .

[10]  Martin R. West,et al.  The Efficacy of Choice Threats within School Accountability Systems: Results from Legislatively Induced Experiments , 2005 .

[11]  Rajashri Chakrabarti,et al.  Do Vouchers Lead to Sorting Under Random Private-School Selection? Evidence from the Milwaukee Voucher Program , 2009 .

[12]  Martin R. West,et al.  Participation in a national, means-tested school voucher program , 2005 .

[13]  William G. Howell.  Dynamic selection effects in means-tested, urban school voucher programs , 2004 .

[14]  Paul E. Peterson,et al.  The Education Gap: Vouchers and Urban Schools , 2003 .

[15]  Dan Goldhaber,et al.  What Do We Know (and Need to Know) about the Impact of School Choice Reforms on Disadvantaged Students , 2002 .

[16]  Carl Franklin.  Rhetoric versus Reality: What We Know and What We Need to Know about Vouchers and Charter Schools , 2002 .

[17]  Mark Schneider,et al.  What Research Can Tell Policymakers about School Choice , 2001 .

[18]  J. Witte,et al.  The Market Approach to Education: An Analysis of America's First Voucher Program , 1999 .

[19]  D. Rees,et al.  Testing for sample selection in the Milwaukee school choice experiment , 1999 .

[20]  Mark Schneider,et al.  School Choice and Culture Wars in the Classroom: What Different Parents Seek from Education. , 1998 .

[21]  William G. Howell,et al.  Lessons from the Cleveland Scholarship Program. , 1997 .

[22]  L. S. Schulman,et al.  THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING. , 1940, Science.