Maturity-based analysis of emerging technologies in the Brazilian Power Sector

Abstract This study proposes a methodology for quantifying the development level of new technologies introduced into the Brazilian Power Sector. The objective is to provide information reflecting technological trends, thus creating opportunities to invest in startups. Based on the findings of a survey conducted with CleanTech startups in Brazil, this analysis is based on Hype Cycle curves for the three main technologies: energy storage, photovoltaic panels and microgrids. The assessment shows that photovoltaic panels and microgrid technologies are more mature than energy storage. However, expectations for technologies available on the market are decreasing, due mainly to a lack of incentives for their use.

[1]  Seung-Pyo Jun,et al.  A comparative study of hype cycles among actors within the socio-technical system: With a focus on the case study of hybrid cars , 2012 .

[2]  S.J. Makinen,et al.  An empirical study of the existence of the Hype Cycle: A case of DVD technology , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[3]  Jinhyung Kim,et al.  Technology trends analysis and forecasting application based on decision tree and statistical feature analysis , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  On the relation between communication and innovation activities: A comparison of hybrid electric and fuel cell vehicles , 2015 .

[5]  L. Leifer,et al.  Scrutinizing Gartner's hype cycle approach , 2010, PICMET 2010 TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH.

[6]  Kornelia Konrad,et al.  The social dynamics of expectations: The interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[7]  R. Stewart,et al.  Drivers, barriers and enablers to end-of-life management of solar photovoltaic and battery energy storage systems: A systematic literature review , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  Suzana Kahn Ribeiro,et al.  Barriers, challenges and opportunities for microgrid implementation: The case of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[9]  Varun Sivaram,et al.  Venture Capital and Cleantech: The Wrong Model for Energy Innovation , 2016 .

[10]  Jaiyong Lee,et al.  Case Study of Cloud Computing Technologies , 2011 .

[11]  Hiroshi Sasaki.  Simulating Hype Cycle Curves with Mathematical Functions : Some Examples of High-Tech Trends in Japan , 2015 .

[12]  Vahid Garousi,et al.  Classification and trend analysis of UML books (1997–2009) , 2011, Software & Systems Modeling.

[13]  Qi Liu,et al.  The expert systems life cycle in AIS research: What does it mean for future AIS research? , 2014, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[14]  C. Montalvo Corral,et al.  Cleaner technology diffusion: case studies, modeling and policy. Editorial , 2008 .

[15]  Martin Steinert,et al.  The hype cycle model: A review and future directions , 2016 .

[16]  Maryam Khodayari,et al.  Analysis of the energy storage technology using Hype Cycle approach , 2018 .

[17]  Annette Ruef,et al.  What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[18]  Jackie Fenn,et al.  Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time , 2008 .

[19]  S.J. Makinen,et al.  Empirically detecting the Hype Cycle with the life cycle indicators: An exploratory analysis of three technologies , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[20]  Kornelia Konrad,et al.  Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment , 2012 .

[21]  Alexander Peine,et al.  Comparing technological hype cycles: Towards a theory , 2013 .

[22]  Seung-Pyo Jun.  An empirical study of users’ hype cycle based on search traffic: the case study on hybrid cars , 2011, Scientometrics.