Arithmetic of Hyperbolic Manifolds

By a hyperbolic 3-manifold we mean a complete orientable hyperbolic 3-manifold of finite volume, that is a quotient H/Γ with Γ ⊂ PSL2C a discrete subgroup of finite covolume (here briefly “a Kleinian group”). Among hyperbolic 3-manifolds, the arithmetic ones form an interesting, and in many ways more tractable, subclass. The tractability comes from the availability of arithmetic tools and invariants. For example, an arithmetic manifold M = H/Γ is determined up to commensurability by its defining field k (a number field with exactly one complex place) and quaternion algebra A (which is ramified at all real places of k ). Any such pair (k,A) determines a unique commensurability class of arithmetic hyperbolic 3-manifolds. One aim of this paper is to try to extend arithmetic considerations to more general hyperbolic 3-manifolds. For example, a commensurability invariant pair (k(M), A(M)) consisting of a non-totally-real number field and a quaternion algebra over it is defined for any M = H/Γ (Sects. 2 and 3; we also write (k(Γ), A(Γ)) ), but it fails to be a complete commensurability invariant of M —non-commensurable M can have the same A(M) (see Sect. 10 for examples). Nevertheless, k(M) and A(M) do contain useful information—for instance (Theorem 3.2 and Proposition 3.3) ramification of A(M) at a finite prime forces subgroups of Γ to have non-trivial abelianizations, A(M) gives a good amphicheirality test (Proposition 3.4), and k(Γ) composes under amalgamation of Kleinian groups along a non-elementary Kleinian group (Theorem 2.8 and [NR1]) and is therefore a mutation invariant. The trace field Q(tr Γ) of Γ is not a commensurability invariant and the field k(Γ) is in fact the smallest field among the trace fields of finite index subgroups of Γ. We call it the invariant trace field of Γ. We show that the trace field Q(tr Γ) is a Galois (Z/2)-extension of the invariant trace field k(Γ) and there is a precise Galois relationship between subgroups of Γ and their trace fields, the largest subgroup of Γ with trace field k(Γ) being normal with quotient (Z/2) (Theorem 2.2). It turns out that the existence of parabolic elements in Γ facilitates many arithmetic questions. For example, in this case A(Γ) is just the matrix algebra M2(k(Γ)). Moreover, k(Γ) equals the field generated by the tetrahedral parameters of the ideal tetrahedra of any ideal triangulation of H/Γ (Theorem 2.4). If one conjugates Γ so that three parabolic fixed points are at 0, 1, and ∞ in C ∪ {∞} = ∂H , then k(Γ) is also the field generated by all parabolic fixed points (Lemma 2.5). As another example, an arithmetic orbifold with cusps cannot have geodesics shorter than 0.431277313 (cf. Theorem 4.6 and Corollary 4.7); a corresponding result for com-

[1]  C. Adams Noncompact Hyperbolic 3-Orbifolds of Small Volume , 1992 .

[2]  Don Zagier,et al.  Volumes of hyperbolic three-manifolds , 1985 .

[3]  L. Clozel On the cuspidal cohomology of arithmetic subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2n)$ and the first Betti number of arithmetic $3$-manifolds , 1987 .

[4]  H. Bass,et al.  Uniform tree lattices , 1990 .

[5]  Alan W. Reid,et al.  Commensurability classes of arithmetic Kleinian groups and their Fuchsian subgroups , 1987, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  I. Aitchison,et al.  Combinatorial Cubings, Cusps, and the Dodecahedral Knots , 1992 .

[7]  O. H. Lowry Academic press. , 1972, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  A. Reid,et al.  Amalgamation and the invariant trace field of a Kleinian group , 1991, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[9]  M. Newman,et al.  THE NORMAL SUBGROUP STRUCTURE OF THE PICARD GROUP , 1987 .

[10]  Jeffrey R. Weeks,et al.  Surgeries on the Whitehead Link Yield Geometrically Similar Manifolds , 1992 .

[11]  Kisao Takeuchi,et al.  A characterization of arithmetic Fuchsian groups , 1975 .

[12]  А.С. Мищенко,et al.  Topology of low-dimensional manifolds , 1983 .

[13]  Alan W. Reid,et al.  A note on Trace-Fields of Kleinian Groups , 1990 .

[14]  W. Magnus Noneuclidean tesselations and their groups , 1974 .

[15]  David W. Boyd,et al.  Reciprocal polynomials having small measure. II , 1980 .

[16]  Robert F. Riley An elliptical path from parabolic representations to hyperbolic structures , 1979 .

[17]  Armand Borel,et al.  Commensurability classes and volumes of hyperbolic 3-manifolds , 1981 .

[18]  R. Meyerhoff A lower bound for the volume of hyperbolic $3$-orbifolds , 1988 .

[19]  A. M. Macbeath Commensurability of co-compact three-dimensional hyperbolic groups , 1983 .

[20]  A. Reid Arithmeticity of Knot Complements , 1991 .

[21]  Jason DeBlois,et al.  Totally geodesic surfaces in hyperbolic 3-manifolds , 2007 .

[22]  Walter D. Neumann,et al.  Notes on Adams' Small Volume Orbifolds , 1992 .

[23]  Youn W. Lee Abelian rank of normal torsion-free finite index subgroups of polyhedral groups , 1985 .

[24]  U. Oertel Closed incompressible surfaces in complements of star links. , 1984 .

[25]  Casson's invariant and quadratic reciprocity , 1991 .

[26]  Don Zagier,et al.  VOLUMES OF HYPERBOLIC 3-MANIFOLDS , 1985 .

[27]  W. Thurston The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds , 1979 .

[28]  H. Helling Bestimmung der Kommensurabilitätsklasse der Hilbertschen Modulgruppe , 1966 .

[29]  H. Bass Groups of integral representation type. , 1980 .

[30]  R. C. Penner,et al.  Euclidean decompositions of noncompact hyperbolic manifolds , 1988 .

[31]  On normal torsion-free finite index subgroups of polyhedral groups , 1989 .

[32]  D. H. Lehmer Factorization of Certain Cyclotomic Functions , 1933 .

[33]  G. M.,et al.  Lehrbuch der Algebra , 1896, Nature.