Fostering Continuous Improvement within new product development processes

Much has been written about Continuous Improvement (CI) conceptually and also empirically in manufacturing environments through case studies. More recently, CI has been evaluated in the context of New Product Development (NPD) processes. However, there is little understanding of the practical issues surrounding adoption of CI in NPD processes, and in particular, of the contingent company-specific variables that affect the implementation of "CI enablers". This paper reports on the findings from a research project that applied an action research approach to investigating these variables in real-time NPD environments. Data from this project, from an in-depth study of a medium-sized design and manufacturing company in the UK, indicate that success with NPD CI enablers may be dependent on less problem-oriented thinking involving high levels of understanding about the concepts underpinning CI, such as improvement and learning. We also suggest that facility with a range of practical skills is necessary; for example, deploying problem-solving tools to procedure and process (rather than product), and a positive interventionist management of the implementation program through CI facilitation. The paper concludes by generalising the findings to current theory about CI and, more specifically, organisational learning within NPD as discussed by Bartezzaghi et al.

[1]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[2]  S. Caffyn,et al.  Enabling Continuous Improvement of New Product Development Processes , 2000 .

[3]  Roger Miller Applying Quality Practices to R&D , 1995 .

[4]  Alan G. Robinson,et al.  Continuous Improvement in Operations: A Systematic Approach to Waste Reduction , 1991 .

[5]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  A process view on managing quality during the creation of technical innovations: Lessons from field research , 1997 .

[6]  Alan W. Pearson,et al.  Total Quality Management in Research and Development , 1994 .

[7]  Anders Berger,et al.  Continuous improvement: design, organisation and management , 1997 .

[8]  Alan G. Robinson,et al.  America's most successful export to Japan: Continuous improvement programs , 1991 .

[9]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[10]  Pär Åhlström,et al.  The difficult path to lean product development , 1996 .

[11]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1992 .

[12]  J. Bessant,et al.  High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement , 1997 .

[13]  Adrian John Wilkinson,et al.  In search of TQM , 1995 .

[14]  Ian Barclay The new product development process: part 2. Improving the process of new product development , 1992 .

[15]  S. Hall Reflexivity in Emancipatory Action Research: Illustrating the Researcher’s Constitutiveness , 1996 .

[16]  J. Gill,et al.  Research Methods For Managers , 1991 .

[17]  D. Buchanan The Logic of Political Action: an Experiment with the Epistemology of the Particular , 1999 .

[18]  Alan W. Pearson,et al.  Total Quality in R&D , 1993 .

[19]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[20]  Sarah Caffyn Extending continuous improvement to the new product development process , 1997 .

[21]  Sarah Jane Caffyn The scope for the application of continuous improvement to the process of new product development , 1998 .

[22]  C. Kirk,et al.  The implications of TQM for R&D strategy in New Zealand firms , 1995 .

[23]  Mariano Corso,et al.  Continuous improvement and inter-project learning in new product development , 1997 .

[24]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[25]  P. Adler Time-and-motion regained , 1993 .