Combining dead recovery, auxiliary observations and robust design data to estimate demographic parameters from marked individuals

Summary When estimating demographic parameters for wild populations, using multiple data sources can increase robustness through greater precision, reducing bias and permitting the estimation of otherwise confounded parameters. We present a method that combines recapture data from marked individuals, collected at a single study site, under a robust design framework, with dead recoveries and auxiliary resightings collected at any time and place. This model permits the joint modelling of survival, permanent and temporary emigration from the study area. We demonstrate that the usefulness of this model is compelling in the case of long-lived species with substantial rates of temporary emigration, to mitigate bias in survival at the end of the time series and to permit conservation decisions based on more current information. We use the case of Florida manatees as an example. Our model can easily be extended to account for an arbitrary number of phenotypic states and account for state uncertainty. The increase in precision overall in vital rates, and the mitigation of bias in survival estimation in the final years of a time series, permits managers to base resource decisions on more robust and timely information. The model also provides the ability to adapt monitoring to changing conditions or specific management objectives, via dynamic allocation of effort to auxiliary resightings.

[1]  James E. Hines,et al.  ESTIMATING TEMPORARY EMIGRATION USING CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA WITH POLLOCK'S ROBUST DESIGN , 1997 .

[2]  Kenneth P. Burnham,et al.  Encounter history modeling of joint mark-recapture, tag-resighting and tag-recovery data under temporary emigration , 2004 .

[3]  Mark S. Lindberg,et al.  A review of designs for capture–mark–recapture studies in discrete time , 2010, Journal of Ornithology.

[4]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .

[5]  W. Kendall,et al.  Sampling design considerations for demographic studies: a case of colonial seabirds. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical Inference from Band Recovery Data: A Handbook , 1978 .

[8]  Gary C White,et al.  Estimating parameters of hidden Markov models based on marked individuals: use of robust design data. , 2012, Ecology.

[9]  Paul F. Doherty,et al.  Survival of Resident Neotropical Birds: Considerations for Sampling and Analysis Based on 20 Years of Bird-Banding Efforts in Mexico , 2012 .

[10]  C. Langtimm,et al.  SURVIVAL ESTIMATES FOR FLORIDA MANATEES FROM THE PHOTO‐IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS , 2004 .

[11]  James D. Nichols,et al.  On the use of secondary capture-recapture samples to estimate temporary emigration and breeding proportions , 1995 .

[12]  Jeffrey L. Beck,et al.  Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) Select Nest Sites and Brood Sites Away from Avian Predators , 2012 .

[13]  Shermin de Silva,et al.  Demography of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) at Uda Walawe National Park, Sri Lanka based on identified individuals , 2011 .

[14]  G. Seber,et al.  Estimating time-specific survival and reporting rates for adult birds from band returns , 1970 .

[15]  S. Rommel,et al.  Pathological features of the Florida manatee cold stress syndrome , 2003 .

[16]  M. Bérubé,et al.  Survival of adult blue whales Balaenoptera musculus in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada , 2006 .

[17]  K. Pollock.  A Capture-Recapture Design Robust to Unequal Probability of Capture , 1982 .

[18]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[19]  Carol A. Sanders-Reed,et al.  A core stochastic population projection model for Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) , 2007 .

[20]  Yulia V. Ivashchenko,et al.  Survival estimates of western gray whales Eschrichtius robustus incorporating individual heterogeneity and temporary emigration , 2006 .

[21]  Richard J. Barker,et al.  JOINT MODELING OF LIVE-RECAPTURE, TAG-RESIGHT, AND TAG-RECOVERY DATA , 1997 .

[22]  C. Langtimm.  Non-random Temporary Emigration and the Robust Design: Conditions for Bias at the End of a Time Series , 2009 .

[23]  C Brownie,et al.  A likelihood-based approach to capture-recapture estimation of demographic parameters under the robust design. , 1995, Biometrics.

[24]  William L. Kendall,et al.  ROBUSTNESS OF CLOSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE METHODS TO VIOLATIONS OF THE CLOSURE ASSUMPTION , 1999 .

[25]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Competing events, mixtures of information and multistratum recapture models , 1999 .

[26]  J E Hines,et al.  Combining Band Recovery Data and Pollock's Robust Design to Model Temporary and Permanent Emigration , 2001, Biometrics.

[27]  Kai Lorenzen,et al.  Apparent survival estimation from continuous mark–recapture/resighting data , 2013 .

[28]  P. Hammond,et al.  Estimating survival and abundance in a bottlenose dolphin population taking into account transience and temporary emigration , 2009 .

[29]  S. Pledger.  Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[30]  Carol A. Sanders-Reed,et al.  A Quantitative Threats Analysis for the Florida Manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) , 2007 .

[31]  Byron J. T. Morgan,et al.  Integrated recovery/recapture data analysis , 1998 .

[32]  Roger Pradel,et al.  Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States , 2005, Biometrics.

[33]  R. Routledge,et al.  The Method of Bounded Counts: When Does It Work? , 1982 .