On the Ocean Wave Attenuation Rate in Grease‐Pancake Ice, a Comparison of Viscous Layer Propagation Models With Field Data

The ability of viscous layer models to describe the attenuation of waves propagating in grease-pancake ice covered ocean is investigated. In particular, the Keller's model Keller [1998], the two-layer viscous model [De Carolis and Desiderio 2002] and the close-packing model [De Santi and Olla 2017] are extensively validated by using wave attenuation data collected during two different field campaigns (Weddell Sea, Antarctica, April 2000; western Arctic Ocean, autumn 2015). We use these data to validate the three models by minimizing the differences between the measured and model wave attenuation; the retrieved ice thickness is then compared with measured data. The three models allow to fit the observation data, but with important differences in the three cases. The close-packing model shows good agreement with the data for values of the ice viscosity comparable to those of grease ice in laboratory experiments. For thin ice, the Keller's model performance is similar to that of the close-packing model, while for thick ice much larger values of the ice viscosity are required, which reflects the different ability of the two models to take into account the effect of pancakes. The improvement of performance over the Keller's model achieved by the two-layer viscous model is minimal, which reflects the marginal role in the dynamics of a finite eddy viscosity in the ice-free layer. A good ice thickness retrieval can be obtained by considering the ice layer as the only source in the wave dynamics, so that the wind input can be disregarded.

[1]  Stephen F. Ackley,et al.  Overview of the Arctic Sea State and Boundary Layer Physics Program , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans.

[2]  S. Ackley,et al.  A conceptual model for pancake-ice formation in a wave field , 2001, Annals of Glaciology.

[3]  R. Long,et al.  Array measurements of atmospheric pressure fluctuations above surface gravity waves , 1981, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  S. Ackley,et al.  The Balance of Ice, Waves, and Winds in the Arctic Autumn , 2017 .

[5]  M. Coon,et al.  Pancake ice formation in the Weddell Sea , 2003 .

[6]  J. Francis Wind stress on a water surface , 1954 .

[7]  J. Keller Gravity waves on ice‐covered water , 1998 .

[8]  V. Squire Of ocean waves and sea-ice revisited , 2007 .

[9]  H. Shen,et al.  Gravity waves propagating into an ice-covered ocean: A viscoelastic model , 2010 .

[10]  P. Wadhams,et al.  Rollover of Apparent Wave Attenuation in Ice Covered Seas , 2017 .

[11]  Giacomo De Carolis,et al.  Relating wave attenuation to pancake ice thickness, using field measurements and model results , 2015 .

[12]  A. Kohout,et al.  Storm-induced sea-ice breakup and the implications for ice extent , 2014, Nature.

[13]  J. Thomson Wave Breaking Dissipation Observed with “SWIFT” Drifters , 2012 .

[14]  J. Weber Wave Attenuation and Wave Drift in the Marginal Ice Zone , 1987 .

[15]  F. Parmiggiani,et al.  Pancake Ice Thickness Mapping in the Beaufort Sea From Wave Dispersion Observed in SAR Imagery , 2018 .

[16]  G. Carolis,et al.  Dispersion and attenuation of gravity waves in ice: a two-layer viscous fluid model with experimental data validation , 2002 .

[17]  Jamie MacMahan,et al.  Observing Ocean Surface Waves with GPS-Tracked Buoys , 2012 .

[18]  P. Olla,et al.  Effective viscosity of grease ice in linearized gravity waves , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Seelye Martin,et al.  Comparison of laboratory data with a viscous two‐layer model of wave propagation in grease ice , 1999 .

[20]  P. Wadhams,et al.  Mapping the Thickness of Pancake Ice Using Ocean Wave Dispersion in SAR Imagery , 1999 .

[21]  S. Hsu,et al.  Determining the power-law wind-profile exponent under near-neutral stability conditions at sea , 1994 .

[22]  P. Wadhams,et al.  Dissipation of wind waves by pancake and frazil ice in the autumn Beaufort Sea: WAVE DAMPING BY ICE IN THE BEAUFORT SEA , 2016 .

[23]  Rasmus T. Tonboe,et al.  A sea-ice thickness retrieval model for 1.4 GHz radiometry and application to airborne measurements over low salinity sea-ice , 2009 .

[24]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  Empirical sea ice thickness retrieval during the freeze-up period from SMOS high incident angle observations , 2013 .

[25]  P. Wadhams,et al.  The Use of SAR to Measure Ocean Wave Dispersion in Frazil–Pancake Icefields , 2002 .

[26]  Stephen F. Ackley,et al.  Development of Sea Ice in the Weddell Sea , 1989, Annals of Glaciology.

[27]  P. Wadhams,et al.  Wave dispersion by frazil-pancake ice from SAR imagery , 1997, IGARSS'97. 1997 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings. Remote Sensing - A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development.

[28]  D. J. Goodman,et al.  The attenuation rates of ocean waves in the marginal ice zone , 1988 .

[29]  H. Shen,et al.  Experimental study on surface wave propagating through a grease–pancake ice mixture , 2010 .

[30]  M. Mooney,et al.  The viscosity of a concentrated suspension of spherical particles , 1951 .

[31]  F. Parmiggiani,et al.  SAR imaging of wave dispersion in Antarctic pancake ice and its use in measuring ice thickness , 2004 .

[32]  S. Ackley,et al.  Calibrating a Viscoelastic Sea Ice Model for Wave Propagation in the Arctic Fall Marginal Ice Zone , 2017 .

[33]  P. Olla,et al.  Effect of small floating disks on the propagation of gravity waves , 2015, 1512.05631.

[34]  Jin Wu Wind‐stress coefficients over sea surface from breeze to hurricane , 1982 .