Prokink: a protocol for numerical evaluation of helix distortions by proline.

Proline residues are known to perturb the structure of helices by introducing a kink between the segments preceding and following the proline residue. The distortion of the helical structure results from the avoided steric clash between the ring of the proline at position (i) and the backbone carbonyl at position (i - 4), as well as the elimination of helix backbone H-bonds for the carbonyls at positions (i - 3) and (i - 4). Both the departure from the ideal helical pattern and the reduction in H-bond stabilization contribute to the observed flexibility of a proline-containing alpha-helix. The special local flexibility of the proline kink can confer an important role on the proline-containing helix in the conformational changes related to the function of the protein. As a useful tool in determining and evaluating the role of proline-induced flexibility and distortions in protein function, we present here a protocol to quantify the geometry of the distortion introduced in helices by prolines both as a time-averaged value and for individual 'snapshots' along a molecular dynamics simulation.

[1]  R. H. Yun,et al.  Proline in α‐helix: Stability and conformation studied by dynamics simulation , 1991 .

[2]  H. Weinstein,et al.  Ligand-induced domain motion in the activation mechanism of a G-protein-coupled receptor. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[3]  M Karplus,et al.  X-ray structure and refinement of carbon-monoxy (Fe II)-myoglobin at 1.5 A resolution. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Analysis and refinement of criteria for predicting the structure and relative orientations of transmembranal helical domains. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[5]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[6]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystallographic refinement and atomic models of two different forms of citrate synthase at 2.7 and 1.7 A resolution. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  Prediction of progress at last , 1991, Nature.

[8]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  The role of a conserved proline residue in mediating conformational changes associated with voltage gating of Cx32 gap junctions. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[9]  H Weinstein,et al.  Agonists induce conformational changes in transmembrane domains III and VI of the β2 adrenoceptor , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[10]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Geometry of proline-containing alpha-helices in proteins. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[11]  C. Deber,et al.  Proline residues in transmembrane helices: structural or dynamic role? , 1991, Biochemistry.

[12]  Dudley H. Williams,et al.  The influence of proline residues on α‐helical structure , 1990 .

[13]  J. Thornton,et al.  Helix geometry in proteins. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  D. R. Holland,et al.  Structural comparison suggests that thermolysin and related neutral proteases undergo hinge-bending motion during catalysis. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[15]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  W. Bode,et al.  The high-resolution X-ray crystal structure of the complex formed between subtilisin Carlsberg and eglin c, an elastase inhibitor from the leech Hirudo medicinalis. Structural analysis, subtilisin structure and interface geometry. , 1987, European journal of biochemistry.

[17]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .