Social versus biophysical availability of wood in the northern United States.

The availability of wood, be it harvested for sawlogs, pulpwood, biomass, or other products, is constrained by social and biophysical factors. Knowing the difference between social and biophysical availability is important for understanding what can realistically be extracted. This study focuses on the wood located in family forests across the northern United States. Family forest owners control 54% of the 7,685 million dry tons of wood in the region. To estimate availability, we begin with the total resource and then apply constraints related to slope, drainage, site productivity, tree size, size of forest holdings, distance to roads, harvesting restrictions, population pressures, and ownership attitudes. These constraints reduce wood availability significantly, by nearly two-thirds according to our calculations. The vast majority of this reduction is due to social factors, in particular owner attitudes. The greatest state-level reductions in wood availability are in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, all of which have estimated reductions of more than 75%.

[1]  J. Kuuluvainen,et al.  Effects of timber prices, ownership objectives, and owner characteristics on timber supply. , 2009 .

[2]  Christopher S. Galik,et al.  Forest biomass supply in the southeastern United States - implications for industrial roundwood and bioenergy production. , 2009 .

[3]  M. D. Nelson,et al.  Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information , 2008 .

[4]  D. Foster,et al.  Forest harvesting and land-use conversion over two decades in Massachusetts , 2006 .

[5]  A. Finley,et al.  Thoreau, Muir, and Jane Doe: Different Types of Private Forest Owners Need Different Kinds of Forest Management , 2006 .

[6]  David N. Wear,et al.  Scale of harvesting by non-industrial private forest landowners , 2006 .

[7]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: a review and synthesis , 2005 .

[8]  Michael A. Kilgore,et al.  Encouraging the application of sustainable timber harvesting practices: A review of policy tool use and effectiveness in the eastern United States , 2004 .

[9]  Daowei Zhang.  Endangered Species and Timber Harvesting: The Case of Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers , 2004 .

[10]  G. Daily,et al.  Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[11]  L. Hunt.  Exploring the availability of Ontario's non-industrial private forest lands for recreation and forestry activities , 2002 .

[12]  T. Bolkesjø,et al.  Roundwood supply in Norway: micro-level analysis of self-employed forest owners , 2002 .

[13]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  How Joint is Joint Forest Production? An Econometric Analysis of Timber Supply Conditional on Endogenous Amenity Values , 2002, Forest Science.

[14]  Jeffrey P. Prestemon,et al.  Linking harvest choices to timber supply , 2000 .

[15]  Raymond M. Sheffield,et al.  The effects of population growth on timber management and inventories in Virginia , 1999 .

[16]  David L. Evans,et al.  The Effect of Urban Sprawl on Timber Harvesting: A Look at Two Southern States , 1998 .

[17]  J. Kuuluvainen,et al.  Landowner Objectives and Nonindustrial Private Timber Supply , 1996, Forest Science.

[18]  M. Luckert,et al.  An economic analysis of landowner propensity for woodlot management and harvesting in northwestern Saskatchewan , 1995 .

[19]  David N. Wear,et al.  Production Economics of Private Forestry: A Comparison of Industrial and Nonindustrial Forest Owners , 1993 .

[20]  D. M. Holthausen,et al.  The behavior of nonindustrial private forest landowners , 1989 .

[21]  R. Boyd.  Government Support of Nonindustrial Production: The Case of Private Forests* , 1984 .

[22]  C. Perry,et al.  Forest Resources of the United States, 2007 , 2009 .

[23]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[24]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program - national sampling design and estimation procedures , 2005 .

[25]  B. Butler,et al.  Design, implementation, and analysis methods for the National Woodland Owner Survey , 2005 .

[26]  Eric M. White,et al.  A sensitivity analysis of "Forests on the edge: housing development on America's private forests". , 2005 .

[27]  J. Kline,et al.  Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050. , 2003 .

[28]  Seth J. Wenger,et al.  A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent and vegetation , 1999 .

[29]  V. Ringstad,et al.  Determinants of forest activities - a study of private nonindustrial forestry in Norway , 1995 .

[30]  D. Dennis.  An economic analysis of harvest behavior: integrating forest and ownership characteristics , 1989 .

[31]  K. Haynes,et al.  Gravity and Spatial Interaction Models , 1985 .