Genealogy and subpopulation differentiation under various models of population structure

Abstract. The structured coalescent is used to calculate some quantities relating to the genealogy of a pair of homologous genes and to the degree of subpopulation differentiation, under a range of models of subdivided populations and assuming the infinite alleles model of neutral mutation. The classical island and stepping-stone models of population structure are considered, as well as two less symmetric models. For each model, we calculate the Laplace transform of the distribution of the coalescence time of a pair of genes from specified locations and the corresponding mean and variance. These results are then used to calculate the values of Wright’s coefficient FST, its limit as the mutation rate tends to zero and the limit of its derivative with respect to the mutation rate as the mutation rate tends to zero. From this derivative it is seen that FST can depend strongly on the mutation rate, for example in the case of an essentially one-dimensional habitat with many subpopulations where gene flow is restricted to neighbouring subpopulations.

[1]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[2]  L. Tabah,et al.  Malecot Gustave. — Quelques schémas probabilistes sur la variabilité des populations naturelles , 1951 .

[3]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical structure of populations. , 1950, Nature.

[4]  N E Morton,et al.  Genetic structure of forensic populations. , 1992, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  David J Balding,et al.  Effects of population structure on DNA fingerprint analysis in forensic science , 1991, Heredity.

[6]  R. Hudson Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. , 1990 .

[7]  M. Slatkin The average number of sites separating DNA sequences drawn from a subdivided population. , 1987, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Gene Flow in Natural Populations , 1985 .

[9]  Hilde Maria Jozefa Dominiek Herbots,et al.  Stochastic Models in Population Genetics: Genealogy and Genetic Differentiation in Structured Populations. , 1994 .

[10]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  ISOLATION BY DISTANCE IN EQUILIBRIUM AND NON‐EQUILIBRIUM POPULATIONS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  G Malécot,et al.  Heterozygosity and relationship in regularly subdivided populations. , 1975, Theoretical population biology.

[12]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[13]  M. Notohara,et al.  The coalescent and the genealogical process in geographically structured population , 1990, Journal of mathematical biology.

[14]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  The strong-migration limit in geographically structured populations , 1980, Journal of mathematical biology.

[15]  T. Maruyama,et al.  Effective number of alleles in a subdivided population. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  N. Takahata,et al.  The coalescent in two partially isolated diffusion populations. , 1988, Genetical research.

[17]  H. Danker-Hopfe,et al.  7 Analysis of population structure: A comparative study of different estimators of wright's fixation indices , 1991 .

[18]  T. Nagylaki The influence of spatial inhomogeneities on neutral models of geographical variation: I. Formulation , 1988 .

[19]  Chris Cannings,et al.  The latent roots of certain Markov chains arising in genetics: A new approach, II. Further haploid models , 1974, Advances in Applied Probability.

[20]  S. Sawyer Results for the Stepping Stone Model for Migration in Population Genetics , 1976 .

[21]  J. Kingman On the genealogy of large populations , 1982, Journal of Applied Probability.

[22]  H. Herbots The Structured Coalescent. , 1997 .

[23]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  The influence of spatial inhomogeneities on neutral models of geographical variation: II. The semi-infinite linear habitat , 1988 .

[24]  G. Malécot,et al.  Les mathématiques de l'hérédité , 1948 .

[25]  M. Nei Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  T. Nagylaki The robustness of neutral models of geographical variation , 1983 .

[27]  C. J-F,et al.  THE COALESCENT , 1980 .

[28]  P Donnelly,et al.  Coalescents and genealogical structure under neutrality. , 1995, Annual review of genetics.

[29]  D J Balding,et al.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.

[30]  C. Strobeck,et al.  Average number of nucleotide differences in a sample from a single subpopulation: a test for population subdivision. , 1987, Genetics.

[31]  J. Hey,et al.  A multi-dimensional coalescent process applied to multi-allelic selection models and migration models. , 1991, Theoretical population biology.

[32]  C. Cannings The latent roots of certain Markov chains arising in genetics: A new approach, II. Further haploid models , 1975, Advances in Applied Probability.

[33]  G. Malécot,et al.  The mathematics of heredity , 1948 .

[34]  M. Slatkin,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THREE INDIRECT METHODS FOR ESTIMATING AVERAGE LEVELS OF GENE FLOW , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  The number of heterozygous loci between two randomly chosen completely linked sequences of loci in two subdivided population models , 1981 .

[36]  K. Roeder DNA Fingerprinting: A Review of the Controversy , 1994 .

[37]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of DNA Profiling Data in Forensic Identification Applications , 1997 .

[38]  B D Latter,et al.  The island model of population differentiation: a general solution. , 1973, Genetics.

[39]  M. Nei,et al.  MOLECULAR POPULATION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION , 1976 .

[40]  W. Li,et al.  Distribution of nucleotide differences between two randomly chosen cistrons in a subdivided population: the finite island model. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[41]  J. Crow,et al.  Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  Fixation indices in subdivided populations. , 1998, Genetics.

[43]  C. Cockerham,et al.  ESTIMATION OF GENE FLOW FROM F‐STATISTICS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  N. Barton,et al.  Genealogies and geography. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  T. Nagylaki The expected number of heterozygous sites in a subdivided population. , 1998, Genetics.