Person-Situation Effects in the Prediction of Performance: An Investigation of Ability, Self-Esteem, and Reward Contingencies.

Abstract : Interactional psychology is concerned with the identification of situational characteristics that enhance the prediction of behavior from knowledge of individual characteristics. Ability, self-esteem, and reward contingencies were examined as predictors of individual effort and performance. Hypotheses were developed using the interactionist approach. Sixty people were hired to work for one week in a simulated organization. Although characteristics of both people and the situation influenced effort and performance, there was no evidence of differential validity. The need to consider situational and individual difference characteristics as independent predictors is discussed and examples of future research questions are presented. Past emphasis on maximization of predictive validities without regard to situational effects on levels of performance is criticized. (Author)

[1]  B. Ekehammar,et al.  Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Daryl J. Bem,et al.  ON PREDICTING SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME: THE SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIOR , 1974 .

[3]  Chronic self-esteem as a moderator of performance consequences of expected pay , 1974 .

[4]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  PERSON-SITUATION SELECTION: A REVIEW OF SOME ABILITY-SITUATION INTERACTION RESEARCH , 1978 .

[5]  Abraham K. Korman,et al.  Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. , 1970 .

[6]  Lawrence H. Peters,et al.  The behavioral and affective consequences of performance-relevant situational variables☆ , 1980 .

[7]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Statistical power in criterion-related validation studies. , 1976 .

[8]  David C. Funder,et al.  Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations. , 1978 .

[9]  Norman S. Endler,et al.  Interactional psychology and personality , 1976 .

[10]  Philip J. DeLeo,et al.  The effects of continuous and partial schedules of reinforcement on effort, performance, and satisfaction , 1980 .

[11]  J. Terborg.  Validation and extension of an individual differences model of work performance , 1977 .

[12]  L. H. Peters,et al.  Situational Constraints and Work Outcomes: The Influences Of a Frequently Overlooked Construct , 1980 .

[13]  S R WALLACE,et al.  CRITERIA FOR WHAT? , 1965, The American psychologist.

[14]  Marvin D. Dunnette,et al.  Performance Equals Ability and What , 1973 .

[15]  S. B. Sells.  AN INTERACTIONIST LOOKS AT THE ENVIRONMENT , 1963 .

[16]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  THE INTERACTION OF ABILITY AND MOTIVATION IN PERFORMANCE: AN EXPLORATION OF THE MEANING OF MODERATORS , 1978 .

[17]  R. Holzbach,et al.  Impact of individual differences, reward distribution, and task structure on productivity in a simulated work environment. , 1973 .

[18]  G. M. Mullet,et al.  Where Have all the Moderators Gone: The Perils of Type II Error. , 1977 .

[19]  Jacob Cohen.  Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components. , 1978 .

[20]  Marvin D. Dunnette,et al.  Personnel Selection and Placement , 1966 .