The Differential Effects of Brief Exposures and Surrounding Contours on Direct and Indirect Tilt Illusions

Four experiments in which logarithmic intervals between 25 and 1600 ms were used for stimulus duration in tests for the tilt illusion are reported. It is demonstrated that the direct and the indirect tilt illusions both increase in magnitude inversely with length of stimulus presentation. The data suggest that whereas the direct effect peaks with a value of about +7° at the shortest flash duration used (25 ms), peak indirect effects (of about +2°) do not occur at this duration. In addition, whereas direct effects level out after 100 ms stimulus exposure times, to the usual magnitude obtained with long presentations (about + 2°), indirect effects reach their standard magnitude (−0.5° to −1.0°) later, at exposures of about 400 ms. Even at very short flash durations, a luminance square frame surrounding the illusion display reduces the indirect effect by two thirds of its magnitude but has no effect at all on the direct effect. It is suggested that direct effects arise early in visual processing, in area V1, where there are transient mechanisms and where corruption of orientation analysis by the inducing grating would occur prior to later, extrastriate, global analysis of the surrounding peripheral frame. Indirect effects, on the other hand, may arise later, along the sustained parvocellular colour—form pathway, where more global processing occurs and susceptibility to surrounding fields might be expected.

[1]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions , 1988, Vision Research.

[2]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Magnussen,et al.  Temporal aspects of spatial adaptation. A study of the tilt aftereffect , 1986, Vision Research.

[4]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  The tilt illusion as a function of the relative and absolute lengths of test and inducing lines , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex , 1985, Vision Research.

[6]  S. Ebenholtz.  Depth separation fails to modulate the orientation-inhibition effect , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects , 1984, Vision Research.

[8]  Ebenholtz Sm,et al.  Peripheral circular contours inhibit the visual orientation control system. , 1983 .

[9]  Svein Magnussen,et al.  Linear summation of tilt illusion and tilt aftereffect , 1980, Vision Research.

[10]  Brian I. O'Toole.  The tilt illusion: Length and luminance changes of induction line and third (disinhibiting) line , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  A Elsner,et al.  Hue difference contours can be used in processing orientation information , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  The tilt illusion: Repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian , 1977, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Orientation illusions and after-effects: Inhibition between channels , 1975, Vision Research.

[14]  D. Mitchell,et al.  The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect. , 1974, Vision research.

[15]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Spatial Frequency Selectivity of a Visual Tilt Illusion , 1973, Nature.

[16]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Lateral Inhibition between Orientation Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1970, Nature.

[17]  G. K. Wallace.  The critical distance of interaction in the Zöllner illusion , 1969 .

[18]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Physiological Evidence for Two Visual Subsystems , 1987 .

[19]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  Peripheral circular contours inhibit the visual orientation control system. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[21]  R Sekuler,et al.  Letter: Tilt aftereffect following very brief exposures. , 1974, Vision research.

[22]  R Over,et al.  Orientation illusion and masking in central and peripheral vision. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.