Artificial Intelligence Affordances for Business Innovation: A Systematic Review of Literature

Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) have begun to play an evermore important role in business innovation. The purpose of this paper is to review current literature to identify definitions and concepts related to artificial intelligence affordances and how artificial intelligence affords business innovation. Using a systematic six-step literature review methodology conducted with an iterative disposition, seven major affordances of AI for business innovation were identified, i.e. (i) Automate business processes, (ii) Customise end user interaction, (iii) Proactively anticipate and react to changes, (iv) Augment and upskill the workforce, (v) Assist decision making, (vi) Improve risk management, and (vii) Develop and enhance intellectual property. The literature surveyed furthermore shows that there are several gaps which allow for further research. Firstly, the definition of artificial intelligence is inconsistent and there is no widely accepted definition. Several AI-based technologies and applications being developed (e.g. Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Natural Language Processing and Neural Networks) require a clear understanding of the affordances of such technologies to be able to make informed strategic decisions. Therefore, understanding the affordances of artificial intelligence in general plays an important role in making such decisions.

[1]  Ronald Pike,et al.  Progressing from the SOC to the EOC , 2019, AMCIS.

[2]  Samuel Fosso Wamba,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Implications for IS Research , 2019, AMCIS.

[3]  Antoine Harfouche,et al.  A Framework for Artificial Knowledge Creation in Organizations , 2017, ICIS.

[4]  S. Sambrook,et al.  Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation , 2009 .

[5]  Christine Rzepka,et al.  User Interaction with AI-enabled Systems: A Systematic Review of IS Research , 2018, ICIS.

[6]  Stefanie Paluch,et al.  A Nice and Friendly Chat with a Bot: User Perceptions of AI-Based Service Agents , 2017, ICIS.

[7]  Elena Gorbacheva,et al.  Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Andrew Nguyen,et al.  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR THE REAL WORLD , 2023, International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science.

[9]  M. Christopher,et al.  The self-thinking supply chain , 2019, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

[10]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Towards a Future Reallocation of Work between Humans and Machines - Taxonomy of Tasks and Interaction Types in the Context of Machine Learning , 2017, ICIS.

[12]  Anne-Laure Fayard,et al.  Affordances for practice , 2014, Inf. Organ..

[13]  M. Purdy,et al.  Game changing value from Artificial Intelligence: eight strategies , 2018 .

[14]  Margareta Heidt,et al.  A New Organizational Chassis for Artificial Intelligence - Exploring Organizational Readiness Factors , 2019, ECIS.

[15]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Harold W. Lewis Fuzzy Control as Artificial Intelligence , 1997 .

[17]  Michael Leyer,et al.  Me, You or AI? How do we Feel about Delegation , 2019, ECIS.

[18]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Finding the Unicorn: Predicting Early Stage Startup Success Through a Hybrid Intelligence Method , 2017, ICIS.

[19]  Mohammad Asif Salam,et al.  Achieving supply chain excellence through supplier management , 2018, Benchmarking: An International Journal.

[20]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[21]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Affordances, experimentation and actualization of FinTech: A blockchain implementation study , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Christoph Lattemann,et al.  Virtual Moderation Assistance: Creating Design Guidelines for Virtual Assistants Supporting Creative Workshops , 2018, PACIS.

[23]  One-Ki Lee,et al.  AI-Based Voice Assistant Systems: Evaluating from the Interaction and Trust Perspectives , 2017, AMCIS.

[24]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda , 2017, Information Systems and e-Business Management.

[25]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Knowledge Embodiment of Human and Machine Interactions: robotic-Process-Automation at the Finland Government , 2019, ECIS.

[26]  Quynh N. Nguyen,et al.  AI capabilities and user experiences: a comparative study of user reviews for assistant and non-assistant mobile apps , 2017, AMCIS.

[27]  Mary Tate,et al.  Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars' Journal Basket Via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value? , 2013, MIS Q..

[29]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  How Big Data Analytics Enables Service Innovation: Materiality, Affordance, and the Individualization of Service , 2018, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Quynh N. Nguyen,et al.  Understanding user interactions with a chatbot: a self-determination theory approach , 2018, AMCIS.

[31]  Eusebio Scornavacca,et al.  A Literature Analysis of Research on Artificial Intelligence in Management Information System (MIS) , 2018, AMCIS.

[32]  Peter Buxmann,et al.  Promoting Trust in AI-based Expert Systems , 2019, AMCIS.

[33]  Matthias Schumann,et al.  What Do You Need Today? - An Empirical Systematization of Application Areas for Chatbots at Digital Workplaces , 2019, AMCIS.

[34]  Mamolise Mokheseng,et al.  Supply chain solutions to improve the distribution of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) to clinics in rural areas: A case study of the QwaQwa district , 2017 .

[35]  Yiftach Nagar,et al.  Making Business Predictions by Combining Human and Machine Intelligence in Prediction Markets , 2011, ICIS.

[36]  K. Schwab The Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2013 .

[37]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..