A study of the discrepancy between self- and observer-ratings on managerial derailment characteristics of European managers

Managerial derailment is costly to managers, their co-workers, and their organization. Knowing whether discrepancies (i.e., differences, dissimilarity, disagreement, incongruity) exist between self- and observer- (subordinates, peers, and bosses) ratings about derailment may help to lessen or prevent the detrimental outcomes of derailment on managers, their co-workers, and their organization. Results from 1742 European managers revealed a statistically significant difference between a manager's self-ratings and observer-ratings on the extent to which a manager displayed derailment behaviours and characteristics. The discrepancy also widened as managerial level increased, and was mostly due to inflated self-ratings. In addition, discrepancies between self – boss, self – direct report, and self – peer were examined, as well as differences between European and American managers. A discussion of these findings and implications for practice conclude this article.

[1]  J. Edwards.  The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[2]  Joyce Hogan,et al.  Assessing Leadership: A View from the Dark Side , 2001 .

[3]  S. Ashford.  Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective , 1986 .

[4]  William A. Gentry,et al.  A study of managerial derailment characteristics and personality preferences , 2007 .

[5]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  On the Use of Polynomial Regression Equations As An Alternative to Difference Scores in Organizational Research , 1993 .

[6]  Bradford D. Smart,et al.  Topgrading : how leading companies win by hiring, coaching, and keeping the best players , 2005 .

[7]  Barbara E. Kovach.  Successful derailment: What fast trackers can learn while they're off the track , 1989 .

[8]  Philippe Rosinski,et al.  Coaching across cultures : new tools for leveraging national, corporate and professional differences , 2003 .

[9]  David A. Nadler,et al.  When CEOs Step Up To Fail , 2004 .

[10]  David W. Bracken,et al.  Should 360-degree Feedback Be Used Only for Developmental Purposes? , 1997 .

[11]  The young and the clueless. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[12]  David L. Dotlich,et al.  Why CEOs Fail: The 11 Behaviors That Can Derail Your Climb to the Top--And How to Manage Them , 2003 .

[13]  Robert Loo,et al.  Journaling: A Learning Tool for Project Management Training and Team-building , 2002 .

[14]  Michael M. Lombardo,et al.  The dynamics of management derailment , 1988 .

[15]  C. Douglas.  Key Events and Lessons for Managers in a Diverse Workforce: A Report on Research and Findings , 2003 .

[16]  Walter W. Tornow,et al.  Perceptions or reality: Is multi-perspective measurement a means or an end? , 1993 .

[17]  C. Cooper,et al.  The person-environment fit approach to stress: Recurring problems and some suggested solutions , 1990 .

[18]  T. Garavan,et al.  Developing self‐awareness in the managerial career development process: the value of 360‐degree feedback and the MBTI , 1999 .

[19]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. , 1988 .

[20]  J. Conway,et al.  Managerial Performance Development Constructs and Personality Correlates , 2000 .

[21]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  UNDERSTANDING SELF-OTHER AGREEMENT: A LOOK AT RATER AND RATEE CHARACTERISTICS, CONTEXT, AND OUTCOMES , 2004 .

[22]  R. Kaplan,et al.  High Hurdles: The Challenge of Executive Self-Development , 1985 .

[23]  James W. Smither,et al.  Measuring the impact of multisource feedback. , 2001 .

[24]  Clive Fletcher,et al.  Self Awareness – A Neglected Attribute in Selection and Assessment? , 1997 .

[25]  J. Leslie,et al.  A Look at Derailment Today: North America and Europe. , 1996 .

[26]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Culture , Leadership , and Organizations : The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies , 2022 .

[27]  Cynthia D. McCauley,et al.  BENCHMARKS: An instrument for diagnosing managerial strengths and weaknesses. , 1990 .

[28]  J. Conger,et al.  Building Leaders: How Successful Companies Develop the Next Generation , 2007 .

[29]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Modern Data Analytic Techniques for Multisource Feedback , 2003 .

[30]  R. Boyatzis,et al.  PRIMAL LEADERSHIP: THE HIDDEN DRIVER OF GREAT PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[31]  J. Conway,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Incremental Validity and Nomological Networks for Subordinate and Peer Rating , 2001 .

[32]  Michael M. Lombardo,et al.  Off the Track: Why and How Successful Executives Get Derailed , 1983 .

[33]  John W. Fleenor,et al.  Demographic and personality predictors of congruence in multi‐source ratings , 1999 .

[34]  Suzy Wales,et al.  Why coaching? , 2002 .

[35]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  John W. Fleenor,et al.  Does 360-degree Feedback Work in Different Industries? A Between-Industry Comparison of the Reliability and Validity of Multi-source Performance Ratings. , 1998 .

[37]  H. Levinson.  Beyond the selection failures. , 1994 .

[38]  Allan H. Church,et al.  Do higher performing managers actually receive better ratings? A validation of multirater assessment methodology. , 2000 .

[39]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Why smart executives fail , 2005 .

[40]  L. Cronbach,et al.  How we should measure "change": Or should we? , 1970 .

[41]  John W. Fleenor,et al.  Self-other rating agreement and leader effectiveness , 1996 .

[42]  Cynthia D. McCauley,et al.  Diagnosing Management Development Needs: An Instrument Based on How Managers Develop , 1989 .

[43]  A. H. Church,et al.  Managerial self-awareness in high-performing individuals in organizations. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  F. Shipper,et al.  A study of impending derailment and recovery of middle managers across career stages , 2000 .

[45]  Barbara E. Kovach.  The derailment of fast-track managers , 1986 .

[46]  Troy V. Mumford,et al.  Coming Full Circle: Using Research and Practice to Address 27 Questions About 360-Degree Feedback Programs. , 2005 .

[47]  Sarah A. Hezlett,et al.  TRAIT, RATER AND LEVEL EFFECTS IN 360‐DEGREE PERFORMANCE RATINGS , 1998 .

[48]  L. Atwater,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF UPWARD FEEDBACK ON SELF‐ AND FOLLOWER RATINGS OF LEADERSHIP , 1995 .

[49]  Stephen A. Dwight,et al.  Predicting executive performance with multirater surveys: Whom you ask makes a difference. , 2002 .

[50]  Randall P. White,et al.  Breaking the glass ceiling : can women reach the top of America's largest corporations? , 1994 .

[51]  Chet Robie,et al.  Self-Other Agreement: Comparing its Relationship with Performance in the U.S. and Europe , 2005 .

[52]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  SELF‐OTHER AGREEMENT: DOES IT REALLY MATTER? , 1998 .

[53]  James W. Smither,et al.  CAN MULTI-SOURCE FEEDBACK CHANGE PERCEPTIONS OF GOAL ACCOMPLISHMENT, SELF-EVALUATIONS, AND PERFORMANCE-RELATED OUTCOMES? THEORY-BASED APPLICATIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH , 1995 .

[54]  Ellen Van Velsor,et al.  A look at derailment today , 1996 .

[55]  F. Sala.  Executive Blind Spots: Discrepancies Between Self- and Other-Ratings. , 2003 .

[56]  Morgan W. McCall,et al.  Key Events in Executives Lives , 1987 .

[57]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Alternatives to difference scores as dependent variables in the study of congruence in organizational research. , 1995 .

[58]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  MULTIPLE ASSESSMENT OF MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS: INTERRATER AGREEMENT AND CONSENSUS IN EFFECTIVENESS MODELS , 1988 .