Combined Wide-Narrow Double Modulation of Spin-Torque Oscillators for Improved Linewidth During Communication

Spin-torque oscillators (STOs) offer the advantage of high modulation rates. However the existence of regions with high-frequency nonlinearity, accompanied by increased signal linewidth, limits both the usable STO frequency range and the minimum frequency of modulation. On the other hand, use of a large modulation frequency increases the frequency modulation (FM) bandwidth. In order to overcome these problems, we propose to simultaneously modulate the STO with two signals having different frequencies. We use a high-frequency, “wide” (fW=500 MHz), modulation signal to improve the STO linewidth. At the same time we use a low-frequency, “narrow” (fN=40 MHz), modulation signal to show successful narrow bandwidth modulation of the improved STO signal. The proposed method of combined wide-narrow double modulation can significantly improve the usable operating frequency range of the STOs for communication applications.

[1]  Franck Badets,et al.  A GHz spintronic-based RF oscillator , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - Digest of Technical Papers.

[2]  Johan AAkerman,et al.  Analytical investigation of modulated spin-torque oscillators in the framework of coupled differential equations with variable coefficients , 2012, 1202.3429.

[3]  Ye. Pogoryelov,et al.  Nonlinear frequency and amplitude modulation of a nanocontact-based spin-torque oscillator , 2009, 0910.2819.

[4]  Johan Åkerman,et al.  Toward a Universal Memory , 2005, Science.

[5]  Berger Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[6]  G Finocchio,et al.  Combined Frequency-Amplitude Nonlinear Modulation: Theory and Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  W. Rippard,et al.  Direct-current induced dynamics in Co90 Fe10/Ni80 Fe20 point contacts. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[8]  Johan Åkerman,et al.  Spin torque oscillator frequency versus magnetic field angle: The prospect of operation beyond 65 GHz , 2009 .

[9]  R. W. Dave,et al.  A 4-Mb toggle MRAM based on a novel bit and switching method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[10]  Andrei Slavin,et al.  Spin wave mode excited by spin-polarized current in a magnetic nanocontact is a standing self-localized wave bullet. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[11]  Johan Åkerman,et al.  Modulation of single and double spin torque oscillators , 2011 .

[12]  Johan Akerman,et al.  Experimental evidence of self-localized and propagating spin wave modes in obliquely magnetized current-driven nanocontacts. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[13]  Yan Zhou,et al.  Spin Torque Oscillators and RF Currents—Modulation, Locking, and Ringing , 2011 .

[14]  Ye. Pogoryelov,et al.  Spin-torque oscillator linewidth narrowing under current modulation , 2011, 1104.3167.

[15]  F. Mancoff,et al.  Modulation of Individual and Mutually Synchronized Nanocontact-Based Spin Torque Oscillators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[16]  William H. Rippard,et al.  Comparison of frequency, linewidth, and output power in measurements of spin-transfer nanocontact oscillators , 2006 .

[17]  V. Tiberkevich,et al.  Nonlinear Auto-Oscillator Theory of Microwave Generation by Spin-Polarized Current , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[18]  N. Rizzo,et al.  Area-Dependence of High Frequency Spin-Transfer Resonance in GMR Contacts up to 300 nm Diameter , 2006, INTERMAG 2006 - IEEE International Magnetics Conference.

[19]  S. E. Russek,et al.  Frequency modulation of spin-transfer oscillators , 2005 .

[20]  J. C. Sloncxewski,et al.  Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers , 2003 .

[21]  John Casimir Slonczewski,et al.  Excitation of spin waves by an electric current , 1999 .

[22]  Ye. Pogoryelov,et al.  Frequency modulation of spin torque oscillator pairs , 2010, 1007.2305.

[23]  W. Rippard,et al.  Developments in nano-oscillators based upon spin-transfer point-contact devices , 2008 .