Modeling the public health system response to a terrorist event in the food supply.

We have developed a simulation model to quantify and characterize the response of the public health system and the impact of public health advisories in the event of an intentional contamination of the food supply. The model has three components: (1) definition of individual exposure over time and the outcomes of exposure, (2) definition of the geographical dispersal of exposures, and (3) response of the public health authorities to symptomatic individuals. The model explicitly considers the variation in the multiple interrelated facets of the response system, including differences among individuals' responses to exposure, variation between health care providers, and the subsequent processing of samples and confirmation of cases. To illustrate use of the model, case studies with Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. in three categories of food vehicle were compared. The level of detail required to run the public health component of the model is not trivial. While some data may not be available for hazards of particular interest in potential bioterrorism events, the application of expert judgment permits comparisons between different agents, different system reactions, and other assumptions within the system. The model provides the capacity to study the impact of system changes, to compare scenarios and to quantify the benefits of improvement in terms of averted exposures and risk reduction, and constitutes a significant aid to understanding and managing these threats. Essentially, the model provides an explicit valuation of time saved in the identification and intervention in terrorist events in the food supply.

[1]  Dina Hoefer,et al.  Factors associated with seeking medical care and submitting a stool sample in estimating the burden of foodborne illness. , 2006, Foodborne pathogens and disease.

[2]  Louis Anthony Cox,et al.  Optimal Tracking and Testing of U.S. and Canadian Herds for BSE: A Value‐of‐Information (VOI) Approach , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  T J Cieslak,et al.  Biological warfare : A historical perspective , 1997 .

[4]  Laura C Rodrigues,et al.  The study of infectious intestinal disease in England: what risk factors for presentation to general practice tell us about potential for selection bias in case-control studies of reported cases of diarrhoea. , 2003, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  William K. Hallman,et al.  Public Response to the Contaminated Spinach Recall of 2006 , 2007 .

[6]  F. Kasuga,et al.  Dose response modelling of Escherichia coli O157 incorporating data from foodborne and environmental outbreaks. , 2005, International journal of food microbiology.

[7]  Paul V. Effler,et al.  Food Safety for First Responders , 2005, Emerging infectious diseases.

[8]  Delores H. Chambers,et al.  Consumer storage practices for refrigerated ready-to-eat foods: Results of a web-enabled survey , 2007 .

[9]  Fumie Yokota,et al.  Value of Information Analysis in Environmental Health Risk Management Decisions: Past, Present, and Future , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  D. Bryan,et al.  Nicotine poisoning after ingestion of contaminated ground beef--Michigan, 2003. , 2003, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.